Cargando…

Attitudes towards terminal sedation: an empirical survey among experts in the field of medical ethics

BACKGROUND: "Terminal sedation" regarded as the use of sedation in (pre-)terminal patients with treatment-refractory symptoms is controversially discussed not only within palliative medicine. While supporters consider terminal sedation as an indispensable palliative medical treatment optio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simon, Alfred, Kar, Magdalene, Hinz, José, Beck, Dietmar
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1855046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17437628
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-684X-6-4
_version_ 1782133128759869440
author Simon, Alfred
Kar, Magdalene
Hinz, José
Beck, Dietmar
author_facet Simon, Alfred
Kar, Magdalene
Hinz, José
Beck, Dietmar
author_sort Simon, Alfred
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: "Terminal sedation" regarded as the use of sedation in (pre-)terminal patients with treatment-refractory symptoms is controversially discussed not only within palliative medicine. While supporters consider terminal sedation as an indispensable palliative medical treatment option, opponents disapprove of it as "slow euthanasia". Against this background, we interviewed medical ethics experts by questionnaire on the term and the moral acceptance of terminal sedation in order to find out how they think about this topic. We were especially interested in whether experts with a professional medical and nursing background think differently about the topic than experts without this background. METHODS: The survey was carried out by questionnaire; beside the provided answering options free text comments were possible. As test persons we chose the 477 members of the German Academy for Ethics in Medicine, an interdisciplinary society for medical ethics. RESULTS: 281 completed questionnaires were returned (response rate = 59%). The majority of persons without medical background regarded "terminal sedation" as an intentional elimination of consciousness until the patient's death occurs; persons with a medical background generally had a broader understanding of the term, including light or intermittent forms of sedation. 98% of the respondents regarded terminal sedation in dying patients with treatment-refractory physical symptoms as acceptable. Situations in which the dying process has not yet started, in which untreatable mental symptoms are the indication for terminal sedation or in which life-sustaining measures are withdrawn during sedation were evaluated as morally difficult. CONCLUSION: The survey reveals a great need for research and discussion on the medical indication as well as on the moral evaluation of terminal sedation. Prerequisite for this is a more precise terminology which describes the circumstances of the sedation.
format Text
id pubmed-1855046
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-18550462007-04-24 Attitudes towards terminal sedation: an empirical survey among experts in the field of medical ethics Simon, Alfred Kar, Magdalene Hinz, José Beck, Dietmar BMC Palliat Care Research Article BACKGROUND: "Terminal sedation" regarded as the use of sedation in (pre-)terminal patients with treatment-refractory symptoms is controversially discussed not only within palliative medicine. While supporters consider terminal sedation as an indispensable palliative medical treatment option, opponents disapprove of it as "slow euthanasia". Against this background, we interviewed medical ethics experts by questionnaire on the term and the moral acceptance of terminal sedation in order to find out how they think about this topic. We were especially interested in whether experts with a professional medical and nursing background think differently about the topic than experts without this background. METHODS: The survey was carried out by questionnaire; beside the provided answering options free text comments were possible. As test persons we chose the 477 members of the German Academy for Ethics in Medicine, an interdisciplinary society for medical ethics. RESULTS: 281 completed questionnaires were returned (response rate = 59%). The majority of persons without medical background regarded "terminal sedation" as an intentional elimination of consciousness until the patient's death occurs; persons with a medical background generally had a broader understanding of the term, including light or intermittent forms of sedation. 98% of the respondents regarded terminal sedation in dying patients with treatment-refractory physical symptoms as acceptable. Situations in which the dying process has not yet started, in which untreatable mental symptoms are the indication for terminal sedation or in which life-sustaining measures are withdrawn during sedation were evaluated as morally difficult. CONCLUSION: The survey reveals a great need for research and discussion on the medical indication as well as on the moral evaluation of terminal sedation. Prerequisite for this is a more precise terminology which describes the circumstances of the sedation. BioMed Central 2007-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC1855046/ /pubmed/17437628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-684X-6-4 Text en Copyright © 2007 Simon et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Simon, Alfred
Kar, Magdalene
Hinz, José
Beck, Dietmar
Attitudes towards terminal sedation: an empirical survey among experts in the field of medical ethics
title Attitudes towards terminal sedation: an empirical survey among experts in the field of medical ethics
title_full Attitudes towards terminal sedation: an empirical survey among experts in the field of medical ethics
title_fullStr Attitudes towards terminal sedation: an empirical survey among experts in the field of medical ethics
title_full_unstemmed Attitudes towards terminal sedation: an empirical survey among experts in the field of medical ethics
title_short Attitudes towards terminal sedation: an empirical survey among experts in the field of medical ethics
title_sort attitudes towards terminal sedation: an empirical survey among experts in the field of medical ethics
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1855046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17437628
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-684X-6-4
work_keys_str_mv AT simonalfred attitudestowardsterminalsedationanempiricalsurveyamongexpertsinthefieldofmedicalethics
AT karmagdalene attitudestowardsterminalsedationanempiricalsurveyamongexpertsinthefieldofmedicalethics
AT hinzjose attitudestowardsterminalsedationanempiricalsurveyamongexpertsinthefieldofmedicalethics
AT beckdietmar attitudestowardsterminalsedationanempiricalsurveyamongexpertsinthefieldofmedicalethics