Cargando…

Why Most Published Research Findings Are False: Problems in the Analysis

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Goodman, Steven, Greenland, Sander
Formato:	Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Public Library of Science 2007
Materias:	Correspondence
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1855693/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17456002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040168

Ejemplares similares

Why Most Published Research Findings Are False: Author's Reply to Goodman and Greenland
por: Ioannidis, John P. A
Publicado: (2007)

Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
por: Ioannidis, John P. A.
Publicado: (2005)

Correction: Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
por: Ioannidis, John P. A.
Publicado: (2022)

Are most published research findings false in a continuous universe?
por: Neves, Kleber, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Most Published Research Findings Are False—But a Little Replication Goes a Long Way
por: Moonesinghe, Ramal, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Are most published research findings false? Trends in statistical power, publication selection bias, and the false discovery rate in psychology (1975–2017)
por: Schneck, Andreas
Publicado: (2023)

Why Most Research Findings About Psi Are False: The Replicability Crisis, the Psi Paradox and the Myth of Sisyphus
por: Rabeyron, Thomas
Publicado: (2020)

Quantifying the unquantifiable: why Hymenoptera, not Coleoptera, is the most speciose animal order
por: Forbes, Andrew A., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Why Most Biomedical Findings Echoed by Newspapers Turn Out to be False: The Case of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
por: Gonon, François, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

A bibliometric analysis of published non-communicable disease research in India
por: Mony, Prem Kumar, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Panspermia—true or false?
por: de Leon, Samuel Ponce, et al.
Publicado: (2003)

Panspermia—true or false?
por: Bhargava, Pushpa M
Publicado: (2003)

“Simple Rules for Editors”? Here is One Rule to Tackle Neglected Problems of Publishing
por: Erren, Thomas C, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Why Most Clinical Research Is Not Useful
por: Ioannidis, John P. A.
Publicado: (2016)

FALSE-NEGATIVE DENGUE CASES
por: TIN, Sim Sai, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Why India needs more exosome research for cancer?
por: Dhar, Rajib, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

A review of machine learning experiments in equity investment decision-making: why most published research findings do not live up to their promise in real life
por: Buczynski, Wojtek, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The most dangerous hospital or the most dangerous equation?
por: Tu, Yu-Kang, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

False reassurance or inadequate drug levels?
por: Tirlangi, Praveen, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

“Simple Rules for Editors”? Here Is One Rule to Tackle Neglected Problems of Publishing: Response from PLoS
por: Patterson, Mark, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Why confronting positionality matters to advancing trans research and discourse
por: Restar, Arjee Javellana
Publicado: (2023)

Space Medicine: Why Do Recently Published Papers about Telomere Length Alterations Increase our Uncertainty Rather than Reduce it?
por: Bevelacqua, J. J., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Replication – why we need to publish our findings
por: Curtis, Michael J, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

False discovery rate control in cancer biomarker selection
por: Li, Zhaoming
Publicado: (2023)

Contradicting/negative results in clinical research: Why (do we get these)? Why not (get these published)? Where (to publish)?
por: Kannan, S., et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Why epigenetics is (not) a biosocial science and why that matters
por: Chiapperino, Luca, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

An evaluation of the quality of statistical design and analysis of published medical research: results from a systematic survey of general orthopaedic journals
por: Parsons, Nick R, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Challenges of the information age: the impact of false discovery on pathway identification
por: Rog, Colin J, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Covert COVID-19 and false-positive dengue serology in Singapore
por: Yan, Gabriel, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Correspondence (reply): The application conditions of false discovery rate control
por: Zhang, Hongbin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Publishing in learned journals
por: Arseculeratne, S.N.
Publicado: (2010)

Awareness of predatory publishing
por: Panjikaran, Lloyd, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

We Must Find the Problem in the Intrinsic Mechanisms of Both Media and Medical Research
por: Benedetti, Luciano
Publicado: (2005)

Meta-analyses triggered by previous (false-)significant findings: problems and solutions
por: Schuit, Ewoud, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Systematic overestimation of gene gain through false diagnosis of gene absence
por: Zhaxybayeva, Olga, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

The false lumen problem
por: Lee, W. Anthony
Publicado: (2023)

Why Not Clean Milk?
Publicado: (1923)

The false academy: predatory publishing in science and bioethics
por: Eriksson, Stefan, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Big data papers and COVID-19: a “false friend” for academic surgeons
por: Picciariello, A., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

“Why involve older people in research?” Revisiting Alan Walker’s earlier editorial based on recent experiences from the UserAge research programme
por: Hultqvist, Sara, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_io58gf4ec8vvi64jeso50imiuh