Cargando…

Implementing Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative policy: the case of New Zealand public hospitals

BACKGROUND: Studies show that when the Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) is implemented breastfeeding rates increase. However, there are likely to be various barriers to BFHI implementation. This article reports on an empirical study of government-directed BFHI implementation in the New Zeala...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moore, Trinie, Gauld, Robin, Williams, Sheila
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1858680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17448254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-4358-2-8
_version_ 1782133170125144064
author Moore, Trinie
Gauld, Robin
Williams, Sheila
author_facet Moore, Trinie
Gauld, Robin
Williams, Sheila
author_sort Moore, Trinie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Studies show that when the Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) is implemented breastfeeding rates increase. However, there are likely to be various barriers to BFHI implementation. This article reports on an empirical study of government-directed BFHI implementation in the New Zealand public hospital system. It focuses primarily on the barriers encountered through implementing the first Two Steps of the BFHI: developing BFHI policy and communicating it to staff; and providing necessary staff training. METHODS: Qualitative interview data were collected from six lactation consultants. These interviewees emerged via a purposive sample of public hospitals that represent the full range of New Zealand public hospitals. Using a content analysis technique, key themes were drawn from the transcribed interview data. RESULTS: Analysis revealed eight themes: the hospitals were in varying stages of BFHI policy development; hospital policy was not necessarily based on government policy; hospital policies were communicated in differing ways and dependent on resources; factors outside of hospital control impacted on capacity to improve breastfeeding rates; and complex organisational matters pose a barrier to educating personnel involved in the birthing process. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study provide empirical support for prior articles about the process of BFHI policy development and implementation. The study also shows that implementation is multi-faceted and complex.
format Text
id pubmed-1858680
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-18586802007-04-28 Implementing Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative policy: the case of New Zealand public hospitals Moore, Trinie Gauld, Robin Williams, Sheila Int Breastfeed J Research BACKGROUND: Studies show that when the Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) is implemented breastfeeding rates increase. However, there are likely to be various barriers to BFHI implementation. This article reports on an empirical study of government-directed BFHI implementation in the New Zealand public hospital system. It focuses primarily on the barriers encountered through implementing the first Two Steps of the BFHI: developing BFHI policy and communicating it to staff; and providing necessary staff training. METHODS: Qualitative interview data were collected from six lactation consultants. These interviewees emerged via a purposive sample of public hospitals that represent the full range of New Zealand public hospitals. Using a content analysis technique, key themes were drawn from the transcribed interview data. RESULTS: Analysis revealed eight themes: the hospitals were in varying stages of BFHI policy development; hospital policy was not necessarily based on government policy; hospital policies were communicated in differing ways and dependent on resources; factors outside of hospital control impacted on capacity to improve breastfeeding rates; and complex organisational matters pose a barrier to educating personnel involved in the birthing process. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study provide empirical support for prior articles about the process of BFHI policy development and implementation. The study also shows that implementation is multi-faceted and complex. BioMed Central 2007-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC1858680/ /pubmed/17448254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-4358-2-8 Text en Copyright © 2007 Moore et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Moore, Trinie
Gauld, Robin
Williams, Sheila
Implementing Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative policy: the case of New Zealand public hospitals
title Implementing Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative policy: the case of New Zealand public hospitals
title_full Implementing Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative policy: the case of New Zealand public hospitals
title_fullStr Implementing Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative policy: the case of New Zealand public hospitals
title_full_unstemmed Implementing Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative policy: the case of New Zealand public hospitals
title_short Implementing Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative policy: the case of New Zealand public hospitals
title_sort implementing baby friendly hospital initiative policy: the case of new zealand public hospitals
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1858680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17448254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-4358-2-8
work_keys_str_mv AT mooretrinie implementingbabyfriendlyhospitalinitiativepolicythecaseofnewzealandpublichospitals
AT gauldrobin implementingbabyfriendlyhospitalinitiativepolicythecaseofnewzealandpublichospitals
AT williamssheila implementingbabyfriendlyhospitalinitiativepolicythecaseofnewzealandpublichospitals