Cargando…

Infection rates associated with epidural indwelling catheters for seven days or longer: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: To determine infection rate with use of epidural catheters in place for seven days or more. METHODS: Systematic review and pooled analysis of observational studies. RESULTS: Twelve studies with 4,628 patients (median 197 patients) provided information, of which nine (4,334 patients) were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruppen, Wilhelm, Derry, Sheena, McQuay, Henry J, Moore, R Andrew
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1858684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17408476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-684X-6-3
_version_ 1782133171401261056
author Ruppen, Wilhelm
Derry, Sheena
McQuay, Henry J
Moore, R Andrew
author_facet Ruppen, Wilhelm
Derry, Sheena
McQuay, Henry J
Moore, R Andrew
author_sort Ruppen, Wilhelm
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To determine infection rate with use of epidural catheters in place for seven days or more. METHODS: Systematic review and pooled analysis of observational studies. RESULTS: Twelve studies with 4,628 patients (median 197 patients) provided information, of which nine (4,334 patients) were published after 1990. Eight studies (3,893 patients) were retrospective, and four studies (735 patients) prospective. Electronic searches identified three studies and searching reference lists nine. There were 257 catheter-related infections in total, of which 211 were superficial and 57 deep, giving rates of 6.1%, 4.6% and 1.2% respectively. Ten of the 12 studies had deep infection rates of 2% or less. The incidence of deep infection was 1 per 2391 days of treatment, or 0.4 per 1000 catheter treatment days. In nine studies (1503 patients), predominantly in cancer, and with average catheter duration of 74 days, the deep infection rate was 2.8%. The proportion of patients with infection of any type was higher in cancer patients with longer catheter duration. Limited numbers of events meant that no reliable estimate of the impact of prospective and retrospective design could be made. There appeared to be a relationship between catheter duration and infection rate from this and other recent estimates. Four of 57 (7%) patients with deep infection died. CONCLUSION: The best estimate is that one person in 35 with an epidural catheter in place for 74 days for relief of cancer pain can be expected to have a deep epidural infection, and that about 1 in 500 may die of infection-related causes. This is a most uncertain estimate given the limited nature of the evidence.
format Text
id pubmed-1858684
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-18586842007-04-28 Infection rates associated with epidural indwelling catheters for seven days or longer: systematic review and meta-analysis Ruppen, Wilhelm Derry, Sheena McQuay, Henry J Moore, R Andrew BMC Palliat Care Research Article BACKGROUND: To determine infection rate with use of epidural catheters in place for seven days or more. METHODS: Systematic review and pooled analysis of observational studies. RESULTS: Twelve studies with 4,628 patients (median 197 patients) provided information, of which nine (4,334 patients) were published after 1990. Eight studies (3,893 patients) were retrospective, and four studies (735 patients) prospective. Electronic searches identified three studies and searching reference lists nine. There were 257 catheter-related infections in total, of which 211 were superficial and 57 deep, giving rates of 6.1%, 4.6% and 1.2% respectively. Ten of the 12 studies had deep infection rates of 2% or less. The incidence of deep infection was 1 per 2391 days of treatment, or 0.4 per 1000 catheter treatment days. In nine studies (1503 patients), predominantly in cancer, and with average catheter duration of 74 days, the deep infection rate was 2.8%. The proportion of patients with infection of any type was higher in cancer patients with longer catheter duration. Limited numbers of events meant that no reliable estimate of the impact of prospective and retrospective design could be made. There appeared to be a relationship between catheter duration and infection rate from this and other recent estimates. Four of 57 (7%) patients with deep infection died. CONCLUSION: The best estimate is that one person in 35 with an epidural catheter in place for 74 days for relief of cancer pain can be expected to have a deep epidural infection, and that about 1 in 500 may die of infection-related causes. This is a most uncertain estimate given the limited nature of the evidence. BioMed Central 2007-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC1858684/ /pubmed/17408476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-684X-6-3 Text en Copyright © 2007 Ruppen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ruppen, Wilhelm
Derry, Sheena
McQuay, Henry J
Moore, R Andrew
Infection rates associated with epidural indwelling catheters for seven days or longer: systematic review and meta-analysis
title Infection rates associated with epidural indwelling catheters for seven days or longer: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Infection rates associated with epidural indwelling catheters for seven days or longer: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Infection rates associated with epidural indwelling catheters for seven days or longer: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Infection rates associated with epidural indwelling catheters for seven days or longer: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Infection rates associated with epidural indwelling catheters for seven days or longer: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort infection rates associated with epidural indwelling catheters for seven days or longer: systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1858684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17408476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-684X-6-3
work_keys_str_mv AT ruppenwilhelm infectionratesassociatedwithepiduralindwellingcathetersforsevendaysorlongersystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT derrysheena infectionratesassociatedwithepiduralindwellingcathetersforsevendaysorlongersystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mcquayhenryj infectionratesassociatedwithepiduralindwellingcathetersforsevendaysorlongersystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT moorerandrew infectionratesassociatedwithepiduralindwellingcathetersforsevendaysorlongersystematicreviewandmetaanalysis