Cargando…
A new method for accurate assessment of DNA quality after bisulfite treatment
The covalent addition of methylgroups to cytosine has become the most intensively researched epigenetic DNA marker. The vast majority of technologies used for DNA methylation analysis rely on a chemical reaction, the so-called ‘bisulfite treatment’, which introduces methylation-dependent sequence ch...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1865059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17259213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl1134 |
_version_ | 1782133211700133888 |
---|---|
author | Ehrich, Mathias Zoll, Scott Sur, Sudipto van den Boom, Dirk |
author_facet | Ehrich, Mathias Zoll, Scott Sur, Sudipto van den Boom, Dirk |
author_sort | Ehrich, Mathias |
collection | PubMed |
description | The covalent addition of methylgroups to cytosine has become the most intensively researched epigenetic DNA marker. The vast majority of technologies used for DNA methylation analysis rely on a chemical reaction, the so-called ‘bisulfite treatment’, which introduces methylation-dependent sequence changes through selective chemical conversion of non-methylated cytosine to uracil. After treatment, all non-methylated cytosine bases are converted to uracil but all methylated cytosine bases remain cytosine. These methylation dependent C-to-T changes can subsequently be studied using conventional DNA analysis technologies. The bisulfite conversion protocol is susceptible to processing errors, and small deviation from the protocol can result in failure of the treatment. Several attempts have been made to simplify the procedure and increase its robustness. Although significant achievements in this area have been made, bisulfite treatment remains the main source of process variability in the analysis of DNA methylation. This variability in particular impairs assays, which strive for the quantitative assessment of DNA methylation. Here we present basic mathematical considerations, which should be taken into account when analyzing DNA methylation. We also introduce a PCR-based assay, which allows ab initio assessment of the DNA quality after bisulfite treatment and can help to prevent inaccurate quantitative measurement resulting from poor bisulfite treatment. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1865059 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-18650592007-05-22 A new method for accurate assessment of DNA quality after bisulfite treatment Ehrich, Mathias Zoll, Scott Sur, Sudipto van den Boom, Dirk Nucleic Acids Res Methods Online The covalent addition of methylgroups to cytosine has become the most intensively researched epigenetic DNA marker. The vast majority of technologies used for DNA methylation analysis rely on a chemical reaction, the so-called ‘bisulfite treatment’, which introduces methylation-dependent sequence changes through selective chemical conversion of non-methylated cytosine to uracil. After treatment, all non-methylated cytosine bases are converted to uracil but all methylated cytosine bases remain cytosine. These methylation dependent C-to-T changes can subsequently be studied using conventional DNA analysis technologies. The bisulfite conversion protocol is susceptible to processing errors, and small deviation from the protocol can result in failure of the treatment. Several attempts have been made to simplify the procedure and increase its robustness. Although significant achievements in this area have been made, bisulfite treatment remains the main source of process variability in the analysis of DNA methylation. This variability in particular impairs assays, which strive for the quantitative assessment of DNA methylation. Here we present basic mathematical considerations, which should be taken into account when analyzing DNA methylation. We also introduce a PCR-based assay, which allows ab initio assessment of the DNA quality after bisulfite treatment and can help to prevent inaccurate quantitative measurement resulting from poor bisulfite treatment. Oxford University Press 2007-03 2007-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC1865059/ /pubmed/17259213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl1134 Text en © 2007 The Author(s). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Methods Online Ehrich, Mathias Zoll, Scott Sur, Sudipto van den Boom, Dirk A new method for accurate assessment of DNA quality after bisulfite treatment |
title | A new method for accurate assessment of DNA quality after bisulfite treatment |
title_full | A new method for accurate assessment of DNA quality after bisulfite treatment |
title_fullStr | A new method for accurate assessment of DNA quality after bisulfite treatment |
title_full_unstemmed | A new method for accurate assessment of DNA quality after bisulfite treatment |
title_short | A new method for accurate assessment of DNA quality after bisulfite treatment |
title_sort | new method for accurate assessment of dna quality after bisulfite treatment |
topic | Methods Online |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1865059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17259213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl1134 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ehrichmathias anewmethodforaccurateassessmentofdnaqualityafterbisulfitetreatment AT zollscott anewmethodforaccurateassessmentofdnaqualityafterbisulfitetreatment AT sursudipto anewmethodforaccurateassessmentofdnaqualityafterbisulfitetreatment AT vandenboomdirk anewmethodforaccurateassessmentofdnaqualityafterbisulfitetreatment AT ehrichmathias newmethodforaccurateassessmentofdnaqualityafterbisulfitetreatment AT zollscott newmethodforaccurateassessmentofdnaqualityafterbisulfitetreatment AT sursudipto newmethodforaccurateassessmentofdnaqualityafterbisulfitetreatment AT vandenboomdirk newmethodforaccurateassessmentofdnaqualityafterbisulfitetreatment |