Cargando…

A new method for accurate assessment of DNA quality after bisulfite treatment

The covalent addition of methylgroups to cytosine has become the most intensively researched epigenetic DNA marker. The vast majority of technologies used for DNA methylation analysis rely on a chemical reaction, the so-called ‘bisulfite treatment’, which introduces methylation-dependent sequence ch...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ehrich, Mathias, Zoll, Scott, Sur, Sudipto, van den Boom, Dirk
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1865059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17259213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl1134
_version_ 1782133211700133888
author Ehrich, Mathias
Zoll, Scott
Sur, Sudipto
van den Boom, Dirk
author_facet Ehrich, Mathias
Zoll, Scott
Sur, Sudipto
van den Boom, Dirk
author_sort Ehrich, Mathias
collection PubMed
description The covalent addition of methylgroups to cytosine has become the most intensively researched epigenetic DNA marker. The vast majority of technologies used for DNA methylation analysis rely on a chemical reaction, the so-called ‘bisulfite treatment’, which introduces methylation-dependent sequence changes through selective chemical conversion of non-methylated cytosine to uracil. After treatment, all non-methylated cytosine bases are converted to uracil but all methylated cytosine bases remain cytosine. These methylation dependent C-to-T changes can subsequently be studied using conventional DNA analysis technologies. The bisulfite conversion protocol is susceptible to processing errors, and small deviation from the protocol can result in failure of the treatment. Several attempts have been made to simplify the procedure and increase its robustness. Although significant achievements in this area have been made, bisulfite treatment remains the main source of process variability in the analysis of DNA methylation. This variability in particular impairs assays, which strive for the quantitative assessment of DNA methylation. Here we present basic mathematical considerations, which should be taken into account when analyzing DNA methylation. We also introduce a PCR-based assay, which allows ab initio assessment of the DNA quality after bisulfite treatment and can help to prevent inaccurate quantitative measurement resulting from poor bisulfite treatment.
format Text
id pubmed-1865059
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-18650592007-05-22 A new method for accurate assessment of DNA quality after bisulfite treatment Ehrich, Mathias Zoll, Scott Sur, Sudipto van den Boom, Dirk Nucleic Acids Res Methods Online The covalent addition of methylgroups to cytosine has become the most intensively researched epigenetic DNA marker. The vast majority of technologies used for DNA methylation analysis rely on a chemical reaction, the so-called ‘bisulfite treatment’, which introduces methylation-dependent sequence changes through selective chemical conversion of non-methylated cytosine to uracil. After treatment, all non-methylated cytosine bases are converted to uracil but all methylated cytosine bases remain cytosine. These methylation dependent C-to-T changes can subsequently be studied using conventional DNA analysis technologies. The bisulfite conversion protocol is susceptible to processing errors, and small deviation from the protocol can result in failure of the treatment. Several attempts have been made to simplify the procedure and increase its robustness. Although significant achievements in this area have been made, bisulfite treatment remains the main source of process variability in the analysis of DNA methylation. This variability in particular impairs assays, which strive for the quantitative assessment of DNA methylation. Here we present basic mathematical considerations, which should be taken into account when analyzing DNA methylation. We also introduce a PCR-based assay, which allows ab initio assessment of the DNA quality after bisulfite treatment and can help to prevent inaccurate quantitative measurement resulting from poor bisulfite treatment. Oxford University Press 2007-03 2007-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC1865059/ /pubmed/17259213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl1134 Text en © 2007 The Author(s). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methods Online
Ehrich, Mathias
Zoll, Scott
Sur, Sudipto
van den Boom, Dirk
A new method for accurate assessment of DNA quality after bisulfite treatment
title A new method for accurate assessment of DNA quality after bisulfite treatment
title_full A new method for accurate assessment of DNA quality after bisulfite treatment
title_fullStr A new method for accurate assessment of DNA quality after bisulfite treatment
title_full_unstemmed A new method for accurate assessment of DNA quality after bisulfite treatment
title_short A new method for accurate assessment of DNA quality after bisulfite treatment
title_sort new method for accurate assessment of dna quality after bisulfite treatment
topic Methods Online
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1865059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17259213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl1134
work_keys_str_mv AT ehrichmathias anewmethodforaccurateassessmentofdnaqualityafterbisulfitetreatment
AT zollscott anewmethodforaccurateassessmentofdnaqualityafterbisulfitetreatment
AT sursudipto anewmethodforaccurateassessmentofdnaqualityafterbisulfitetreatment
AT vandenboomdirk anewmethodforaccurateassessmentofdnaqualityafterbisulfitetreatment
AT ehrichmathias newmethodforaccurateassessmentofdnaqualityafterbisulfitetreatment
AT zollscott newmethodforaccurateassessmentofdnaqualityafterbisulfitetreatment
AT sursudipto newmethodforaccurateassessmentofdnaqualityafterbisulfitetreatment
AT vandenboomdirk newmethodforaccurateassessmentofdnaqualityafterbisulfitetreatment