Cargando…
Imputation methods for missing data for polygenic models
Methods to handle missing data have been an area of statistical research for many years. Little has been done within the context of pedigree analysis. In this paper we present two methods for imputing missing data for polygenic models using family data. The imputation schemes take into account famil...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2003
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1866478/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14975110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-4-S1-S42 |
_version_ | 1782133279281905664 |
---|---|
author | Fridley, Brooke Rabe, Kari Andrade, Mariza de |
author_facet | Fridley, Brooke Rabe, Kari Andrade, Mariza de |
author_sort | Fridley, Brooke |
collection | PubMed |
description | Methods to handle missing data have been an area of statistical research for many years. Little has been done within the context of pedigree analysis. In this paper we present two methods for imputing missing data for polygenic models using family data. The imputation schemes take into account familial relationships and use the observed familial information for the imputation. A traditional multiple imputation approach and multiple imputation or data augmentation approach within a Gibbs sampler for the handling of missing data for a polygenic model are presented. We used both the Genetic Analysis Workshop 13 simulated missing phenotype and the complete phenotype data sets as the means to illustrate the two methods. We looked at the phenotypic trait systolic blood pressure and the covariate gender at time point 11 (1970) for Cohort 1 and time point 1 (1971) for Cohort 2. Comparing the results for three replicates of complete and missing data incorporating multiple imputation, we find that multiple imputation via a Gibbs sampler produces more accurate results. Thus, we recommend the Gibbs sampler for imputation purposes because of the ease with which it can be extended to more complicated models, the consistency of the results, and the accountability of the variation due to imputation. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1866478 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2003 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-18664782007-05-11 Imputation methods for missing data for polygenic models Fridley, Brooke Rabe, Kari Andrade, Mariza de BMC Genet Proceedings Methods to handle missing data have been an area of statistical research for many years. Little has been done within the context of pedigree analysis. In this paper we present two methods for imputing missing data for polygenic models using family data. The imputation schemes take into account familial relationships and use the observed familial information for the imputation. A traditional multiple imputation approach and multiple imputation or data augmentation approach within a Gibbs sampler for the handling of missing data for a polygenic model are presented. We used both the Genetic Analysis Workshop 13 simulated missing phenotype and the complete phenotype data sets as the means to illustrate the two methods. We looked at the phenotypic trait systolic blood pressure and the covariate gender at time point 11 (1970) for Cohort 1 and time point 1 (1971) for Cohort 2. Comparing the results for three replicates of complete and missing data incorporating multiple imputation, we find that multiple imputation via a Gibbs sampler produces more accurate results. Thus, we recommend the Gibbs sampler for imputation purposes because of the ease with which it can be extended to more complicated models, the consistency of the results, and the accountability of the variation due to imputation. BioMed Central 2003-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC1866478/ /pubmed/14975110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-4-S1-S42 Text en Copyright © 2003 Fridley et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Proceedings Fridley, Brooke Rabe, Kari Andrade, Mariza de Imputation methods for missing data for polygenic models |
title | Imputation methods for missing data for polygenic models |
title_full | Imputation methods for missing data for polygenic models |
title_fullStr | Imputation methods for missing data for polygenic models |
title_full_unstemmed | Imputation methods for missing data for polygenic models |
title_short | Imputation methods for missing data for polygenic models |
title_sort | imputation methods for missing data for polygenic models |
topic | Proceedings |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1866478/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14975110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-4-S1-S42 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fridleybrooke imputationmethodsformissingdataforpolygenicmodels AT rabekari imputationmethodsformissingdataforpolygenicmodels AT andrademarizade imputationmethodsformissingdataforpolygenicmodels |