Cargando…

Imputation methods for missing data for polygenic models

Methods to handle missing data have been an area of statistical research for many years. Little has been done within the context of pedigree analysis. In this paper we present two methods for imputing missing data for polygenic models using family data. The imputation schemes take into account famil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fridley, Brooke, Rabe, Kari, Andrade, Mariza de
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1866478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14975110
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-4-S1-S42
_version_ 1782133279281905664
author Fridley, Brooke
Rabe, Kari
Andrade, Mariza de
author_facet Fridley, Brooke
Rabe, Kari
Andrade, Mariza de
author_sort Fridley, Brooke
collection PubMed
description Methods to handle missing data have been an area of statistical research for many years. Little has been done within the context of pedigree analysis. In this paper we present two methods for imputing missing data for polygenic models using family data. The imputation schemes take into account familial relationships and use the observed familial information for the imputation. A traditional multiple imputation approach and multiple imputation or data augmentation approach within a Gibbs sampler for the handling of missing data for a polygenic model are presented. We used both the Genetic Analysis Workshop 13 simulated missing phenotype and the complete phenotype data sets as the means to illustrate the two methods. We looked at the phenotypic trait systolic blood pressure and the covariate gender at time point 11 (1970) for Cohort 1 and time point 1 (1971) for Cohort 2. Comparing the results for three replicates of complete and missing data incorporating multiple imputation, we find that multiple imputation via a Gibbs sampler produces more accurate results. Thus, we recommend the Gibbs sampler for imputation purposes because of the ease with which it can be extended to more complicated models, the consistency of the results, and the accountability of the variation due to imputation.
format Text
id pubmed-1866478
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2003
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-18664782007-05-11 Imputation methods for missing data for polygenic models Fridley, Brooke Rabe, Kari Andrade, Mariza de BMC Genet Proceedings Methods to handle missing data have been an area of statistical research for many years. Little has been done within the context of pedigree analysis. In this paper we present two methods for imputing missing data for polygenic models using family data. The imputation schemes take into account familial relationships and use the observed familial information for the imputation. A traditional multiple imputation approach and multiple imputation or data augmentation approach within a Gibbs sampler for the handling of missing data for a polygenic model are presented. We used both the Genetic Analysis Workshop 13 simulated missing phenotype and the complete phenotype data sets as the means to illustrate the two methods. We looked at the phenotypic trait systolic blood pressure and the covariate gender at time point 11 (1970) for Cohort 1 and time point 1 (1971) for Cohort 2. Comparing the results for three replicates of complete and missing data incorporating multiple imputation, we find that multiple imputation via a Gibbs sampler produces more accurate results. Thus, we recommend the Gibbs sampler for imputation purposes because of the ease with which it can be extended to more complicated models, the consistency of the results, and the accountability of the variation due to imputation. BioMed Central 2003-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC1866478/ /pubmed/14975110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-4-S1-S42 Text en Copyright © 2003 Fridley et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Proceedings
Fridley, Brooke
Rabe, Kari
Andrade, Mariza de
Imputation methods for missing data for polygenic models
title Imputation methods for missing data for polygenic models
title_full Imputation methods for missing data for polygenic models
title_fullStr Imputation methods for missing data for polygenic models
title_full_unstemmed Imputation methods for missing data for polygenic models
title_short Imputation methods for missing data for polygenic models
title_sort imputation methods for missing data for polygenic models
topic Proceedings
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1866478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14975110
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-4-S1-S42
work_keys_str_mv AT fridleybrooke imputationmethodsformissingdataforpolygenicmodels
AT rabekari imputationmethodsformissingdataforpolygenicmodels
AT andrademarizade imputationmethodsformissingdataforpolygenicmodels