Cargando…

A regression based transmission/disequilibrium test for binary traits: the power of joint tests for linkage and association

BACKGROUND: In this analysis we applied a regression based transmission disequilibrium test to the binary trait presence or absence of Kofendred Personality Disorder in the Genetic Analysis Workshop 14 (GAW14) simulated dataset and determined the power and type I error rate of the method at varying...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Larkin, Emma K, Cartier, Kevin C, Gray-McGuire, Courtney
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1866684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16451711
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-6-S1-S95
_version_ 1782133298601918464
author Larkin, Emma K
Cartier, Kevin C
Gray-McGuire, Courtney
author_facet Larkin, Emma K
Cartier, Kevin C
Gray-McGuire, Courtney
author_sort Larkin, Emma K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In this analysis we applied a regression based transmission disequilibrium test to the binary trait presence or absence of Kofendred Personality Disorder in the Genetic Analysis Workshop 14 (GAW14) simulated dataset and determined the power and type I error rate of the method at varying map densities and sample sizes. To conduct this transmission disequilibrium test, the logit transformation was applied to a binary outcome and regressed on an indicator variable for the transmitted allele from informative matings. All 100 replicates from chromosomes 1, 3, 5, and 9 for the Aipotu and the combined Aipotu, Karangar, and Danacaa populations were used at densities of 3, 1, and 0.3 cM. Power and type I error were determined by the number of replicates significant at the 0.05 level. RESULTS: The maximum power to detect linkage and association with the Aipotu population was 93% for chromosome 3 using a 0.3-cM map. For chromosomes 1, 5, and 9 the power was less than 10% at the 3-cM scan and less than 22% for the 0.3-cM map. With the larger sample size, power increased to 38% for chromosome 1, 100% for chromosome 3, 31% for chromosome 5, and 23% for chromosome 9. Type I error was approximately 7%. CONCLUSION: The power of this method is highly dependent on the amount of information in a region. This study suggests that single-point methods are not particularly effective in narrowing a fine-mapping region, particularly when using single-nucleotide polymorphism data and when linkage disequilibrium in the region is variable.
format Text
id pubmed-1866684
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-18666842007-05-11 A regression based transmission/disequilibrium test for binary traits: the power of joint tests for linkage and association Larkin, Emma K Cartier, Kevin C Gray-McGuire, Courtney BMC Genet Proceedings BACKGROUND: In this analysis we applied a regression based transmission disequilibrium test to the binary trait presence or absence of Kofendred Personality Disorder in the Genetic Analysis Workshop 14 (GAW14) simulated dataset and determined the power and type I error rate of the method at varying map densities and sample sizes. To conduct this transmission disequilibrium test, the logit transformation was applied to a binary outcome and regressed on an indicator variable for the transmitted allele from informative matings. All 100 replicates from chromosomes 1, 3, 5, and 9 for the Aipotu and the combined Aipotu, Karangar, and Danacaa populations were used at densities of 3, 1, and 0.3 cM. Power and type I error were determined by the number of replicates significant at the 0.05 level. RESULTS: The maximum power to detect linkage and association with the Aipotu population was 93% for chromosome 3 using a 0.3-cM map. For chromosomes 1, 5, and 9 the power was less than 10% at the 3-cM scan and less than 22% for the 0.3-cM map. With the larger sample size, power increased to 38% for chromosome 1, 100% for chromosome 3, 31% for chromosome 5, and 23% for chromosome 9. Type I error was approximately 7%. CONCLUSION: The power of this method is highly dependent on the amount of information in a region. This study suggests that single-point methods are not particularly effective in narrowing a fine-mapping region, particularly when using single-nucleotide polymorphism data and when linkage disequilibrium in the region is variable. BioMed Central 2005-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC1866684/ /pubmed/16451711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-6-S1-S95 Text en Copyright © 2005 Larkin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Proceedings
Larkin, Emma K
Cartier, Kevin C
Gray-McGuire, Courtney
A regression based transmission/disequilibrium test for binary traits: the power of joint tests for linkage and association
title A regression based transmission/disequilibrium test for binary traits: the power of joint tests for linkage and association
title_full A regression based transmission/disequilibrium test for binary traits: the power of joint tests for linkage and association
title_fullStr A regression based transmission/disequilibrium test for binary traits: the power of joint tests for linkage and association
title_full_unstemmed A regression based transmission/disequilibrium test for binary traits: the power of joint tests for linkage and association
title_short A regression based transmission/disequilibrium test for binary traits: the power of joint tests for linkage and association
title_sort regression based transmission/disequilibrium test for binary traits: the power of joint tests for linkage and association
topic Proceedings
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1866684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16451711
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-6-S1-S95
work_keys_str_mv AT larkinemmak aregressionbasedtransmissiondisequilibriumtestforbinarytraitsthepowerofjointtestsforlinkageandassociation
AT cartierkevinc aregressionbasedtransmissiondisequilibriumtestforbinarytraitsthepowerofjointtestsforlinkageandassociation
AT graymcguirecourtney aregressionbasedtransmissiondisequilibriumtestforbinarytraitsthepowerofjointtestsforlinkageandassociation
AT larkinemmak regressionbasedtransmissiondisequilibriumtestforbinarytraitsthepowerofjointtestsforlinkageandassociation
AT cartierkevinc regressionbasedtransmissiondisequilibriumtestforbinarytraitsthepowerofjointtestsforlinkageandassociation
AT graymcguirecourtney regressionbasedtransmissiondisequilibriumtestforbinarytraitsthepowerofjointtestsforlinkageandassociation