Cargando…

Comparison of the power between microsatellite and single-nucleotide polymorphism markers for linkage and linkage disequilibrium mapping of an electrophysiological phenotype

We performed linkage and linkage disequilibrium (LD) mapping analyses to compare the power between microsatellite and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers. Chromosome-wide analyses were performed for a quantitative electrophysiological phenotype, ttth1, on chromosome 7. Multipoint analysis o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Hsiu-Fen, Juo, Suh-Hang Hank, Cheng, Rong
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1866712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16451683
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-6-S1-S7
_version_ 1782133306970603520
author Lin, Hsiu-Fen
Juo, Suh-Hang Hank
Cheng, Rong
author_facet Lin, Hsiu-Fen
Juo, Suh-Hang Hank
Cheng, Rong
author_sort Lin, Hsiu-Fen
collection PubMed
description We performed linkage and linkage disequilibrium (LD) mapping analyses to compare the power between microsatellite and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers. Chromosome-wide analyses were performed for a quantitative electrophysiological phenotype, ttth1, on chromosome 7. Multipoint analysis of microsatellite markers using the variance component (VC) method showed the highest LOD score of 4.20 at 162 cM, near D7S509 (163.7 cM). Two-point analysis of SNPs using the VC method yielded the highest LOD score of 3.98 in the Illumina SNP data and 3.45 in the Affymetrix SNP data around 152–153 cM. In family-based single SNP and SNP haplotype LD analysis, we identified seven SNPs associated with ttth1. We searched for any potential candidate genes in the location of the seven SNPs. The SNPs rs1476640 and rs768055 are located in the FLJ40852 gene (a hypothetical protein), and SNP rs1859646 is located in the TAS2R5 gene (a taste receptor). The other four SNPs are not located in any known or annotated genes. We found the high density SNP scan to be superior to microsatellites because it is effective in downstream fine mapping due to a better defined linkage region. Our study proves the utility of high density SNP in genome-wide mapping studies.
format Text
id pubmed-1866712
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-18667122007-05-11 Comparison of the power between microsatellite and single-nucleotide polymorphism markers for linkage and linkage disequilibrium mapping of an electrophysiological phenotype Lin, Hsiu-Fen Juo, Suh-Hang Hank Cheng, Rong BMC Genet Proceedings We performed linkage and linkage disequilibrium (LD) mapping analyses to compare the power between microsatellite and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers. Chromosome-wide analyses were performed for a quantitative electrophysiological phenotype, ttth1, on chromosome 7. Multipoint analysis of microsatellite markers using the variance component (VC) method showed the highest LOD score of 4.20 at 162 cM, near D7S509 (163.7 cM). Two-point analysis of SNPs using the VC method yielded the highest LOD score of 3.98 in the Illumina SNP data and 3.45 in the Affymetrix SNP data around 152–153 cM. In family-based single SNP and SNP haplotype LD analysis, we identified seven SNPs associated with ttth1. We searched for any potential candidate genes in the location of the seven SNPs. The SNPs rs1476640 and rs768055 are located in the FLJ40852 gene (a hypothetical protein), and SNP rs1859646 is located in the TAS2R5 gene (a taste receptor). The other four SNPs are not located in any known or annotated genes. We found the high density SNP scan to be superior to microsatellites because it is effective in downstream fine mapping due to a better defined linkage region. Our study proves the utility of high density SNP in genome-wide mapping studies. BioMed Central 2005-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC1866712/ /pubmed/16451683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-6-S1-S7 Text en Copyright © 2005 Lin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Proceedings
Lin, Hsiu-Fen
Juo, Suh-Hang Hank
Cheng, Rong
Comparison of the power between microsatellite and single-nucleotide polymorphism markers for linkage and linkage disequilibrium mapping of an electrophysiological phenotype
title Comparison of the power between microsatellite and single-nucleotide polymorphism markers for linkage and linkage disequilibrium mapping of an electrophysiological phenotype
title_full Comparison of the power between microsatellite and single-nucleotide polymorphism markers for linkage and linkage disequilibrium mapping of an electrophysiological phenotype
title_fullStr Comparison of the power between microsatellite and single-nucleotide polymorphism markers for linkage and linkage disequilibrium mapping of an electrophysiological phenotype
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the power between microsatellite and single-nucleotide polymorphism markers for linkage and linkage disequilibrium mapping of an electrophysiological phenotype
title_short Comparison of the power between microsatellite and single-nucleotide polymorphism markers for linkage and linkage disequilibrium mapping of an electrophysiological phenotype
title_sort comparison of the power between microsatellite and single-nucleotide polymorphism markers for linkage and linkage disequilibrium mapping of an electrophysiological phenotype
topic Proceedings
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1866712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16451683
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-6-S1-S7
work_keys_str_mv AT linhsiufen comparisonofthepowerbetweenmicrosatelliteandsinglenucleotidepolymorphismmarkersforlinkageandlinkagedisequilibriummappingofanelectrophysiologicalphenotype
AT juosuhhanghank comparisonofthepowerbetweenmicrosatelliteandsinglenucleotidepolymorphismmarkersforlinkageandlinkagedisequilibriummappingofanelectrophysiologicalphenotype
AT chengrong comparisonofthepowerbetweenmicrosatelliteandsinglenucleotidepolymorphismmarkersforlinkageandlinkagedisequilibriummappingofanelectrophysiologicalphenotype