Cargando…
Linkage analysis of GAW14 simulated data: comparison of multimarker, multipoint, and conditional approaches
The purposes of this study were 1) to examine the performance of a new multimarker regression approach for model-free linkage analysis in comparison to a conventional multipoint approach, and 2) to determine the whether a conditioning strategy would improve the performance of the conventional multip...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2005
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1866744/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16451651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-6-S1-S40 |
_version_ | 1782133316171857920 |
---|---|
author | Barber, Mathew J Wheeler, Eleanor Cordell, Heather J |
author_facet | Barber, Mathew J Wheeler, Eleanor Cordell, Heather J |
author_sort | Barber, Mathew J |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purposes of this study were 1) to examine the performance of a new multimarker regression approach for model-free linkage analysis in comparison to a conventional multipoint approach, and 2) to determine the whether a conditioning strategy would improve the performance of the conventional multipoint method when applied to data from two interacting loci. Linkage analysis of the Kofendrerd Personality Disorder phenotype to chromosomes 1 and 3 was performed in three populations for all 100 replicates of the Genetic Analysis Workshop 14 simulated data. Three approaches were used: a conventional multipoint analysis using the Zlr statistic as calculated in the program ALLEGRO; a conditioning approach in which the per-family contribution on one chromosome was weighted according to evidence for linkage on the other chromosome; and a novel multimarker regression approach. The multipoint and multimarker approaches were generally successful in localizing known susceptibility loci on chromosomes 1 and 3, and were found to give broadly similar results. No advantage was found with the per-family conditioning approach. The effect on power and type I error of different choices of weighting scheme (to account for different numbers of affected siblings) in the multimarker approach was examined. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1866744 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2005 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-18667442007-05-11 Linkage analysis of GAW14 simulated data: comparison of multimarker, multipoint, and conditional approaches Barber, Mathew J Wheeler, Eleanor Cordell, Heather J BMC Genet Proceedings The purposes of this study were 1) to examine the performance of a new multimarker regression approach for model-free linkage analysis in comparison to a conventional multipoint approach, and 2) to determine the whether a conditioning strategy would improve the performance of the conventional multipoint method when applied to data from two interacting loci. Linkage analysis of the Kofendrerd Personality Disorder phenotype to chromosomes 1 and 3 was performed in three populations for all 100 replicates of the Genetic Analysis Workshop 14 simulated data. Three approaches were used: a conventional multipoint analysis using the Zlr statistic as calculated in the program ALLEGRO; a conditioning approach in which the per-family contribution on one chromosome was weighted according to evidence for linkage on the other chromosome; and a novel multimarker regression approach. The multipoint and multimarker approaches were generally successful in localizing known susceptibility loci on chromosomes 1 and 3, and were found to give broadly similar results. No advantage was found with the per-family conditioning approach. The effect on power and type I error of different choices of weighting scheme (to account for different numbers of affected siblings) in the multimarker approach was examined. BioMed Central 2005-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC1866744/ /pubmed/16451651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-6-S1-S40 Text en Copyright © 2005 Barber et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Proceedings Barber, Mathew J Wheeler, Eleanor Cordell, Heather J Linkage analysis of GAW14 simulated data: comparison of multimarker, multipoint, and conditional approaches |
title | Linkage analysis of GAW14 simulated data: comparison of multimarker, multipoint, and conditional approaches |
title_full | Linkage analysis of GAW14 simulated data: comparison of multimarker, multipoint, and conditional approaches |
title_fullStr | Linkage analysis of GAW14 simulated data: comparison of multimarker, multipoint, and conditional approaches |
title_full_unstemmed | Linkage analysis of GAW14 simulated data: comparison of multimarker, multipoint, and conditional approaches |
title_short | Linkage analysis of GAW14 simulated data: comparison of multimarker, multipoint, and conditional approaches |
title_sort | linkage analysis of gaw14 simulated data: comparison of multimarker, multipoint, and conditional approaches |
topic | Proceedings |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1866744/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16451651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-6-S1-S40 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barbermathewj linkageanalysisofgaw14simulateddatacomparisonofmultimarkermultipointandconditionalapproaches AT wheelereleanor linkageanalysisofgaw14simulateddatacomparisonofmultimarkermultipointandconditionalapproaches AT cordellheatherj linkageanalysisofgaw14simulateddatacomparisonofmultimarkermultipointandconditionalapproaches |