Cargando…

Vulnerability as a Function of Individual and Group Resources in Cumulative Risk Assessment

BACKGROUND: The field of risk assessment has focused on protecting the health of individual people or populations of wildlife from single risks, mostly from chemical exposure. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recently began to address multiple risks to communities in the “Framework for Cumul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: deFur, Peter L., Evans, Gary W., Hubal, Elaine A. Cohen, Kyle, Amy D., Morello-Frosch, Rachel A., Williams, David R.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1867984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17520073
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.9332
_version_ 1782133361672716288
author deFur, Peter L.
Evans, Gary W.
Hubal, Elaine A. Cohen
Kyle, Amy D.
Morello-Frosch, Rachel A.
Williams, David R.
author_facet deFur, Peter L.
Evans, Gary W.
Hubal, Elaine A. Cohen
Kyle, Amy D.
Morello-Frosch, Rachel A.
Williams, David R.
author_sort deFur, Peter L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The field of risk assessment has focused on protecting the health of individual people or populations of wildlife from single risks, mostly from chemical exposure. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recently began to address multiple risks to communities in the “Framework for Cumulative Risk Assessment” [EPA/630/P02/001F. Washington DC:Risk Assessment Forum, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2003)]. Simultaneously, several reports concluded that some individuals and groups are more vulnerable to environmental risks than the general population. However, vulnerability has received little specific attention in the risk assessment literature. OBJECTIVE: Our objective is to examine the issue of vulnerability in cumulative risk assessment and present a conceptual framework rather than a comprehensive review of the literature. In this article we consider similarities between ecologic and human communities and the factors that make communities vulnerable to environmental risks. DISCUSSION: The literature provides substantial evidence on single environmental factors and simple conditions that increase vulnerability or reduce resilience for humans and ecologic systems. This observation is especially true for individual people and populations of wildlife. Little research directly addresses the topic of vulnerability in cumulative risk situations, especially at the community level. The community level of organization has not been adequately considered as an end point in either human or ecologic risk assessment. Furthermore, current information on human risk does not completely explain the level of response in cumulative risk conditions. Ecologic risk situations are similarly more complex and unpredictable for cases of cumulative risk. CONCLUSIONS: Psychosocial conditions and responses are the principal missing element for humans. We propose a model for including psychologic and social factors as an integral component of cumulative risk assessment.
format Text
id pubmed-1867984
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-18679842007-06-07 Vulnerability as a Function of Individual and Group Resources in Cumulative Risk Assessment deFur, Peter L. Evans, Gary W. Hubal, Elaine A. Cohen Kyle, Amy D. Morello-Frosch, Rachel A. Williams, David R. Environ Health Perspect Research BACKGROUND: The field of risk assessment has focused on protecting the health of individual people or populations of wildlife from single risks, mostly from chemical exposure. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recently began to address multiple risks to communities in the “Framework for Cumulative Risk Assessment” [EPA/630/P02/001F. Washington DC:Risk Assessment Forum, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2003)]. Simultaneously, several reports concluded that some individuals and groups are more vulnerable to environmental risks than the general population. However, vulnerability has received little specific attention in the risk assessment literature. OBJECTIVE: Our objective is to examine the issue of vulnerability in cumulative risk assessment and present a conceptual framework rather than a comprehensive review of the literature. In this article we consider similarities between ecologic and human communities and the factors that make communities vulnerable to environmental risks. DISCUSSION: The literature provides substantial evidence on single environmental factors and simple conditions that increase vulnerability or reduce resilience for humans and ecologic systems. This observation is especially true for individual people and populations of wildlife. Little research directly addresses the topic of vulnerability in cumulative risk situations, especially at the community level. The community level of organization has not been adequately considered as an end point in either human or ecologic risk assessment. Furthermore, current information on human risk does not completely explain the level of response in cumulative risk conditions. Ecologic risk situations are similarly more complex and unpredictable for cases of cumulative risk. CONCLUSIONS: Psychosocial conditions and responses are the principal missing element for humans. We propose a model for including psychologic and social factors as an integral component of cumulative risk assessment. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2007-05 2007-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC1867984/ /pubmed/17520073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.9332 Text en http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ Publication of EHP lies in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from EHP may be reprinted freely. Use of materials published in EHP should be acknowledged (for example, ?Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives?); pertinent reference information should be provided for the article from which the material was reproduced. Articles from EHP, especially the News section, may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright.
spellingShingle Research
deFur, Peter L.
Evans, Gary W.
Hubal, Elaine A. Cohen
Kyle, Amy D.
Morello-Frosch, Rachel A.
Williams, David R.
Vulnerability as a Function of Individual and Group Resources in Cumulative Risk Assessment
title Vulnerability as a Function of Individual and Group Resources in Cumulative Risk Assessment
title_full Vulnerability as a Function of Individual and Group Resources in Cumulative Risk Assessment
title_fullStr Vulnerability as a Function of Individual and Group Resources in Cumulative Risk Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Vulnerability as a Function of Individual and Group Resources in Cumulative Risk Assessment
title_short Vulnerability as a Function of Individual and Group Resources in Cumulative Risk Assessment
title_sort vulnerability as a function of individual and group resources in cumulative risk assessment
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1867984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17520073
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.9332
work_keys_str_mv AT defurpeterl vulnerabilityasafunctionofindividualandgroupresourcesincumulativeriskassessment
AT evansgaryw vulnerabilityasafunctionofindividualandgroupresourcesincumulativeriskassessment
AT hubalelaineacohen vulnerabilityasafunctionofindividualandgroupresourcesincumulativeriskassessment
AT kyleamyd vulnerabilityasafunctionofindividualandgroupresourcesincumulativeriskassessment
AT morellofroschrachela vulnerabilityasafunctionofindividualandgroupresourcesincumulativeriskassessment
AT williamsdavidr vulnerabilityasafunctionofindividualandgroupresourcesincumulativeriskassessment