Cargando…
Bactericidal action of positive and negative ions in air
BACKGROUND: In recent years there has been renewed interest in the use of air ionisers to control of the spread of airborne infection. One characteristic of air ions which has been widely reported is their apparent biocidal action. However, whilst the body of evidence suggests a biocidal effect in t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1868029/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17439657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-7-32 |
_version_ | 1782133371799863296 |
---|---|
author | Fletcher, Louise A Gaunt, Lindsey F Beggs, Clive B Shepherd, Simon J Sleigh, P Andrew Noakes, Catherine J Kerr, Kevin G |
author_facet | Fletcher, Louise A Gaunt, Lindsey F Beggs, Clive B Shepherd, Simon J Sleigh, P Andrew Noakes, Catherine J Kerr, Kevin G |
author_sort | Fletcher, Louise A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In recent years there has been renewed interest in the use of air ionisers to control of the spread of airborne infection. One characteristic of air ions which has been widely reported is their apparent biocidal action. However, whilst the body of evidence suggests a biocidal effect in the presence of air ions the physical and biological mechanisms involved remain unclear. In particular, it is not clear which of several possible mechanisms of electrical origin (i.e. the action of the ions, the production of ozone, or the action of the electric field) are responsible for cell death. A study was therefore undertaken to clarify this issue and to determine the physical mechanisms associated with microbial cell death. RESULTS: In the study seven bacterial species (Staphylococcus aureus, Mycobacterium parafortuitum, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumanii, Burkholderia cenocepacia, Bacillus subtilis and Serratia marcescens) were exposed to both positive and negative ions in the presence of air. In order to distinguish between effects arising from: (i) the action of the air ions; (ii) the action of the electric field, and (iii) the action of ozone, two interventions were made. The first intervention involved placing a thin mica sheet between the ionisation source and the bacteria, directly over the agar plates. This intervention, while leaving the electric field unaltered, prevented the air ions from reaching the microbial samples. In addition, the mica plate prevented ozone produced from reaching the bacteria. The second intervention involved placing an earthed wire mesh directly above the agar plates. This prevented both the electric field and the air ions from impacting on the bacteria, while allowing any ozone present to reach the agar plate. With the exception of Mycobacterium parafortuitum, the principal cause of cell death amongst the bacteria studied was exposure to ozone, with electroporation playing a secondary role. However in the case of Mycobacterium parafortuitum, electroporation resulting from exposure to the electric field appears to have been the principal cause of cell inactivation. CONCLUSION: The results of the study suggest that the bactericidal action attributed to negative air ions by previous researchers may have been overestimated. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1868029 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-18680292007-05-12 Bactericidal action of positive and negative ions in air Fletcher, Louise A Gaunt, Lindsey F Beggs, Clive B Shepherd, Simon J Sleigh, P Andrew Noakes, Catherine J Kerr, Kevin G BMC Microbiol Research Article BACKGROUND: In recent years there has been renewed interest in the use of air ionisers to control of the spread of airborne infection. One characteristic of air ions which has been widely reported is their apparent biocidal action. However, whilst the body of evidence suggests a biocidal effect in the presence of air ions the physical and biological mechanisms involved remain unclear. In particular, it is not clear which of several possible mechanisms of electrical origin (i.e. the action of the ions, the production of ozone, or the action of the electric field) are responsible for cell death. A study was therefore undertaken to clarify this issue and to determine the physical mechanisms associated with microbial cell death. RESULTS: In the study seven bacterial species (Staphylococcus aureus, Mycobacterium parafortuitum, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumanii, Burkholderia cenocepacia, Bacillus subtilis and Serratia marcescens) were exposed to both positive and negative ions in the presence of air. In order to distinguish between effects arising from: (i) the action of the air ions; (ii) the action of the electric field, and (iii) the action of ozone, two interventions were made. The first intervention involved placing a thin mica sheet between the ionisation source and the bacteria, directly over the agar plates. This intervention, while leaving the electric field unaltered, prevented the air ions from reaching the microbial samples. In addition, the mica plate prevented ozone produced from reaching the bacteria. The second intervention involved placing an earthed wire mesh directly above the agar plates. This prevented both the electric field and the air ions from impacting on the bacteria, while allowing any ozone present to reach the agar plate. With the exception of Mycobacterium parafortuitum, the principal cause of cell death amongst the bacteria studied was exposure to ozone, with electroporation playing a secondary role. However in the case of Mycobacterium parafortuitum, electroporation resulting from exposure to the electric field appears to have been the principal cause of cell inactivation. CONCLUSION: The results of the study suggest that the bactericidal action attributed to negative air ions by previous researchers may have been overestimated. BioMed Central 2007-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC1868029/ /pubmed/17439657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-7-32 Text en Copyright © 2007 Fletcher et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Fletcher, Louise A Gaunt, Lindsey F Beggs, Clive B Shepherd, Simon J Sleigh, P Andrew Noakes, Catherine J Kerr, Kevin G Bactericidal action of positive and negative ions in air |
title | Bactericidal action of positive and negative ions in air |
title_full | Bactericidal action of positive and negative ions in air |
title_fullStr | Bactericidal action of positive and negative ions in air |
title_full_unstemmed | Bactericidal action of positive and negative ions in air |
title_short | Bactericidal action of positive and negative ions in air |
title_sort | bactericidal action of positive and negative ions in air |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1868029/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17439657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-7-32 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fletcherlouisea bactericidalactionofpositiveandnegativeionsinair AT gauntlindseyf bactericidalactionofpositiveandnegativeionsinair AT beggscliveb bactericidalactionofpositiveandnegativeionsinair AT shepherdsimonj bactericidalactionofpositiveandnegativeionsinair AT sleighpandrew bactericidalactionofpositiveandnegativeionsinair AT noakescatherinej bactericidalactionofpositiveandnegativeionsinair AT kerrkeving bactericidalactionofpositiveandnegativeionsinair |