Cargando…
Overview of BioCreAtIvE: critical assessment of information extraction for biology
BACKGROUND: The goal of the first BioCreAtIvE challenge (Critical Assessment of Information Extraction in Biology) was to provide a set of common evaluation tasks to assess the state of the art for text mining applied to biological problems. The results were presented in a workshop held in Granada,...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2005
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1869002/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15960821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-6-S1-S1 |
_version_ | 1782133424377561088 |
---|---|
author | Hirschman, Lynette Yeh, Alexander Blaschke, Christian Valencia, Alfonso |
author_facet | Hirschman, Lynette Yeh, Alexander Blaschke, Christian Valencia, Alfonso |
author_sort | Hirschman, Lynette |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The goal of the first BioCreAtIvE challenge (Critical Assessment of Information Extraction in Biology) was to provide a set of common evaluation tasks to assess the state of the art for text mining applied to biological problems. The results were presented in a workshop held in Granada, Spain March 28–31, 2004. The articles collected in this BMC Bioinformatics supplement entitled "A critical assessment of text mining methods in molecular biology" describe the BioCreAtIvE tasks, systems, results and their independent evaluation. RESULTS: BioCreAtIvE focused on two tasks. The first dealt with extraction of gene or protein names from text, and their mapping into standardized gene identifiers for three model organism databases (fly, mouse, yeast). The second task addressed issues of functional annotation, requiring systems to identify specific text passages that supported Gene Ontology annotations for specific proteins, given full text articles. CONCLUSION: The first BioCreAtIvE assessment achieved a high level of international participation (27 groups from 10 countries). The assessment provided state-of-the-art performance results for a basic task (gene name finding and normalization), where the best systems achieved a balanced 80% precision / recall or better, which potentially makes them suitable for real applications in biology. The results for the advanced task (functional annotation from free text) were significantly lower, demonstrating the current limitations of text-mining approaches where knowledge extrapolation and interpretation are required. In addition, an important contribution of BioCreAtIvE has been the creation and release of training and test data sets for both tasks. There are 22 articles in this special issue, including six that provide analyses of results or data quality for the data sets, including a novel inter-annotator consistency assessment for the test set used in task 2. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1869002 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2005 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-18690022007-05-18 Overview of BioCreAtIvE: critical assessment of information extraction for biology Hirschman, Lynette Yeh, Alexander Blaschke, Christian Valencia, Alfonso BMC Bioinformatics Introduction BACKGROUND: The goal of the first BioCreAtIvE challenge (Critical Assessment of Information Extraction in Biology) was to provide a set of common evaluation tasks to assess the state of the art for text mining applied to biological problems. The results were presented in a workshop held in Granada, Spain March 28–31, 2004. The articles collected in this BMC Bioinformatics supplement entitled "A critical assessment of text mining methods in molecular biology" describe the BioCreAtIvE tasks, systems, results and their independent evaluation. RESULTS: BioCreAtIvE focused on two tasks. The first dealt with extraction of gene or protein names from text, and their mapping into standardized gene identifiers for three model organism databases (fly, mouse, yeast). The second task addressed issues of functional annotation, requiring systems to identify specific text passages that supported Gene Ontology annotations for specific proteins, given full text articles. CONCLUSION: The first BioCreAtIvE assessment achieved a high level of international participation (27 groups from 10 countries). The assessment provided state-of-the-art performance results for a basic task (gene name finding and normalization), where the best systems achieved a balanced 80% precision / recall or better, which potentially makes them suitable for real applications in biology. The results for the advanced task (functional annotation from free text) were significantly lower, demonstrating the current limitations of text-mining approaches where knowledge extrapolation and interpretation are required. In addition, an important contribution of BioCreAtIvE has been the creation and release of training and test data sets for both tasks. There are 22 articles in this special issue, including six that provide analyses of results or data quality for the data sets, including a novel inter-annotator consistency assessment for the test set used in task 2. BioMed Central 2005-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC1869002/ /pubmed/15960821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-6-S1-S1 Text en Copyright © 2005 Hirschman et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Introduction Hirschman, Lynette Yeh, Alexander Blaschke, Christian Valencia, Alfonso Overview of BioCreAtIvE: critical assessment of information extraction for biology |
title | Overview of BioCreAtIvE: critical assessment of information extraction for biology |
title_full | Overview of BioCreAtIvE: critical assessment of information extraction for biology |
title_fullStr | Overview of BioCreAtIvE: critical assessment of information extraction for biology |
title_full_unstemmed | Overview of BioCreAtIvE: critical assessment of information extraction for biology |
title_short | Overview of BioCreAtIvE: critical assessment of information extraction for biology |
title_sort | overview of biocreative: critical assessment of information extraction for biology |
topic | Introduction |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1869002/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15960821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-6-S1-S1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hirschmanlynette overviewofbiocreativecriticalassessmentofinformationextractionforbiology AT yehalexander overviewofbiocreativecriticalassessmentofinformationextractionforbiology AT blaschkechristian overviewofbiocreativecriticalassessmentofinformationextractionforbiology AT valenciaalfonso overviewofbiocreativecriticalassessmentofinformationextractionforbiology |