Cargando…
Systematic feature evaluation for gene name recognition
In task 1A of the BioCreAtIvE evaluation, systems had to be devised that recognize words and phrases forming gene or protein names in natural language sentences. We approach this problem by building a word classification system based on a sliding window approach with a Support Vector Machine, combin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2005
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1869023/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15960843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-6-S1-S9 |
_version_ | 1782133430655385600 |
---|---|
author | Hakenberg, Jörg Bickel, Steffen Plake, Conrad Brefeld, Ulf Zahn, Hagen Faulstich, Lukas Leser, Ulf Scheffer, Tobias |
author_facet | Hakenberg, Jörg Bickel, Steffen Plake, Conrad Brefeld, Ulf Zahn, Hagen Faulstich, Lukas Leser, Ulf Scheffer, Tobias |
author_sort | Hakenberg, Jörg |
collection | PubMed |
description | In task 1A of the BioCreAtIvE evaluation, systems had to be devised that recognize words and phrases forming gene or protein names in natural language sentences. We approach this problem by building a word classification system based on a sliding window approach with a Support Vector Machine, combined with a pattern-based post-processing for the recognition of phrases. The performance of such a system crucially depends on the type of features chosen for consideration by the classification method, such as pre- or postfixes, character n-grams, patterns of capitalization, or classification of preceding or following words. We present a systematic approach to evaluate the performance of different feature sets based on recursive feature elimination, RFE. Based on a systematic reduction of the number of features used by the system, we can quantify the impact of different feature sets on the results of the word classification problem. This helps us to identify descriptive features, to learn about the structure of the problem, and to design systems that are faster and easier to understand. We observe that the SVM is robust to redundant features. RFE improves the performance by 0.7%, compared to using the complete set of attributes. Moreover, a performance that is only 2.3% below this maximum can be obtained using fewer than 5% of the features. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1869023 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2005 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-18690232007-05-18 Systematic feature evaluation for gene name recognition Hakenberg, Jörg Bickel, Steffen Plake, Conrad Brefeld, Ulf Zahn, Hagen Faulstich, Lukas Leser, Ulf Scheffer, Tobias BMC Bioinformatics Report In task 1A of the BioCreAtIvE evaluation, systems had to be devised that recognize words and phrases forming gene or protein names in natural language sentences. We approach this problem by building a word classification system based on a sliding window approach with a Support Vector Machine, combined with a pattern-based post-processing for the recognition of phrases. The performance of such a system crucially depends on the type of features chosen for consideration by the classification method, such as pre- or postfixes, character n-grams, patterns of capitalization, or classification of preceding or following words. We present a systematic approach to evaluate the performance of different feature sets based on recursive feature elimination, RFE. Based on a systematic reduction of the number of features used by the system, we can quantify the impact of different feature sets on the results of the word classification problem. This helps us to identify descriptive features, to learn about the structure of the problem, and to design systems that are faster and easier to understand. We observe that the SVM is robust to redundant features. RFE improves the performance by 0.7%, compared to using the complete set of attributes. Moreover, a performance that is only 2.3% below this maximum can be obtained using fewer than 5% of the features. BioMed Central 2005-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC1869023/ /pubmed/15960843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-6-S1-S9 Text en Copyright © 2005 Hakenberg et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Report Hakenberg, Jörg Bickel, Steffen Plake, Conrad Brefeld, Ulf Zahn, Hagen Faulstich, Lukas Leser, Ulf Scheffer, Tobias Systematic feature evaluation for gene name recognition |
title | Systematic feature evaluation for gene name recognition |
title_full | Systematic feature evaluation for gene name recognition |
title_fullStr | Systematic feature evaluation for gene name recognition |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic feature evaluation for gene name recognition |
title_short | Systematic feature evaluation for gene name recognition |
title_sort | systematic feature evaluation for gene name recognition |
topic | Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1869023/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15960843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-6-S1-S9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hakenbergjorg systematicfeatureevaluationforgenenamerecognition AT bickelsteffen systematicfeatureevaluationforgenenamerecognition AT plakeconrad systematicfeatureevaluationforgenenamerecognition AT brefeldulf systematicfeatureevaluationforgenenamerecognition AT zahnhagen systematicfeatureevaluationforgenenamerecognition AT faulstichlukas systematicfeatureevaluationforgenenamerecognition AT leserulf systematicfeatureevaluationforgenenamerecognition AT scheffertobias systematicfeatureevaluationforgenenamerecognition |