Cargando…

Interventionally implanted port catheter systems for hepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases: A phase II-study and historical comparison with the surgical approach

BACKGROUND: The high complication rates of surgically implanted port catheter systems (SIPCS) represents a major drawback in the treatment of isolated liver neoplasms by hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of chemotherapy. Interventionally implanted port catheter systems (IIPCS) have evolved into a prom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hildebrandt, Bert, Pech, Maciej, Nicolaou, Annett, Langrehr, Jan M, Kurcz, Jacek, Bartels, Birgit, Miersch, Alexandra, Felix, Roland, Neuhaus, Peter, Riess, Hanno, Dörken, Bernd, Ricke, Jens
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1871598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17456240
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-7-69
_version_ 1782133442754904064
author Hildebrandt, Bert
Pech, Maciej
Nicolaou, Annett
Langrehr, Jan M
Kurcz, Jacek
Bartels, Birgit
Miersch, Alexandra
Felix, Roland
Neuhaus, Peter
Riess, Hanno
Dörken, Bernd
Ricke, Jens
author_facet Hildebrandt, Bert
Pech, Maciej
Nicolaou, Annett
Langrehr, Jan M
Kurcz, Jacek
Bartels, Birgit
Miersch, Alexandra
Felix, Roland
Neuhaus, Peter
Riess, Hanno
Dörken, Bernd
Ricke, Jens
author_sort Hildebrandt, Bert
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The high complication rates of surgically implanted port catheter systems (SIPCS) represents a major drawback in the treatment of isolated liver neoplasms by hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of chemotherapy. Interventionally implanted port catheter systems (IIPCS) have evolved into a promising alternative that enable initiation of HAI without laparatomy, but prospective data on this approach are still sparse. Aim of this study was to evaluate the most important technical endpoints associated with the use of IIPCS for the delivery of 5-fluorouracil-based HAI in patients with colorectal liver metastases in a phase 2-study, and to perform a non-randomised comparison with a historical group of patients in which HAI was administered via SIPCS. METHODS: 41 patients with isolated liver metastases of colorectal cancer were enrolled into a phase II-study and provided with IIPCS between 2001 and 2004 (group A). The primary objective of the trial was defined as evaluation of device-related complications and port duration. Results were compared with those observed in a pre-defined historical collective of 40 patients treated with HAI via SIPCS at our institution between 1996 and 2000 (group B). RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were balanced between both groups, except for higher proportions of previous palliative pre-treatment and elevated serum alkaline phosphatase in patients of group A. Implantation of port catheters was successful in all patients of group A, whereas two primary failures were observed in group B. The frequency of device-related complications was similar between both groups, but the secondary failure rate was significantly higher with the use of surgical approach (17% vs. 50%, p < 0.01). Mean port duration was significantly longer in the interventional group (19 vs. 14 months, p = 0.01), with 77 vs. 50% of devices functioning at 12 months (p < 0.01). No unexpected complications were observed in both groups. CONCLUSION: HAI via interventionally implanted port catheters can be safely provided to a collective of patients with colorectal liver metastases, including a relevant proportion of preatreated individuals. It appears to offer technical advantages over the surgical approach.
format Text
id pubmed-1871598
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-18715982007-05-17 Interventionally implanted port catheter systems for hepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases: A phase II-study and historical comparison with the surgical approach Hildebrandt, Bert Pech, Maciej Nicolaou, Annett Langrehr, Jan M Kurcz, Jacek Bartels, Birgit Miersch, Alexandra Felix, Roland Neuhaus, Peter Riess, Hanno Dörken, Bernd Ricke, Jens BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: The high complication rates of surgically implanted port catheter systems (SIPCS) represents a major drawback in the treatment of isolated liver neoplasms by hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of chemotherapy. Interventionally implanted port catheter systems (IIPCS) have evolved into a promising alternative that enable initiation of HAI without laparatomy, but prospective data on this approach are still sparse. Aim of this study was to evaluate the most important technical endpoints associated with the use of IIPCS for the delivery of 5-fluorouracil-based HAI in patients with colorectal liver metastases in a phase 2-study, and to perform a non-randomised comparison with a historical group of patients in which HAI was administered via SIPCS. METHODS: 41 patients with isolated liver metastases of colorectal cancer were enrolled into a phase II-study and provided with IIPCS between 2001 and 2004 (group A). The primary objective of the trial was defined as evaluation of device-related complications and port duration. Results were compared with those observed in a pre-defined historical collective of 40 patients treated with HAI via SIPCS at our institution between 1996 and 2000 (group B). RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were balanced between both groups, except for higher proportions of previous palliative pre-treatment and elevated serum alkaline phosphatase in patients of group A. Implantation of port catheters was successful in all patients of group A, whereas two primary failures were observed in group B. The frequency of device-related complications was similar between both groups, but the secondary failure rate was significantly higher with the use of surgical approach (17% vs. 50%, p < 0.01). Mean port duration was significantly longer in the interventional group (19 vs. 14 months, p = 0.01), with 77 vs. 50% of devices functioning at 12 months (p < 0.01). No unexpected complications were observed in both groups. CONCLUSION: HAI via interventionally implanted port catheters can be safely provided to a collective of patients with colorectal liver metastases, including a relevant proportion of preatreated individuals. It appears to offer technical advantages over the surgical approach. BioMed Central 2007-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC1871598/ /pubmed/17456240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-7-69 Text en Copyright © 2007 Hildebrandt et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hildebrandt, Bert
Pech, Maciej
Nicolaou, Annett
Langrehr, Jan M
Kurcz, Jacek
Bartels, Birgit
Miersch, Alexandra
Felix, Roland
Neuhaus, Peter
Riess, Hanno
Dörken, Bernd
Ricke, Jens
Interventionally implanted port catheter systems for hepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases: A phase II-study and historical comparison with the surgical approach
title Interventionally implanted port catheter systems for hepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases: A phase II-study and historical comparison with the surgical approach
title_full Interventionally implanted port catheter systems for hepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases: A phase II-study and historical comparison with the surgical approach
title_fullStr Interventionally implanted port catheter systems for hepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases: A phase II-study and historical comparison with the surgical approach
title_full_unstemmed Interventionally implanted port catheter systems for hepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases: A phase II-study and historical comparison with the surgical approach
title_short Interventionally implanted port catheter systems for hepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases: A phase II-study and historical comparison with the surgical approach
title_sort interventionally implanted port catheter systems for hepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases: a phase ii-study and historical comparison with the surgical approach
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1871598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17456240
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-7-69
work_keys_str_mv AT hildebrandtbert interventionallyimplantedportcathetersystemsforhepaticarterialinfusionofchemotherapyinpatientswithcolorectallivermetastasesaphaseiistudyandhistoricalcomparisonwiththesurgicalapproach
AT pechmaciej interventionallyimplantedportcathetersystemsforhepaticarterialinfusionofchemotherapyinpatientswithcolorectallivermetastasesaphaseiistudyandhistoricalcomparisonwiththesurgicalapproach
AT nicolaouannett interventionallyimplantedportcathetersystemsforhepaticarterialinfusionofchemotherapyinpatientswithcolorectallivermetastasesaphaseiistudyandhistoricalcomparisonwiththesurgicalapproach
AT langrehrjanm interventionallyimplantedportcathetersystemsforhepaticarterialinfusionofchemotherapyinpatientswithcolorectallivermetastasesaphaseiistudyandhistoricalcomparisonwiththesurgicalapproach
AT kurczjacek interventionallyimplantedportcathetersystemsforhepaticarterialinfusionofchemotherapyinpatientswithcolorectallivermetastasesaphaseiistudyandhistoricalcomparisonwiththesurgicalapproach
AT bartelsbirgit interventionallyimplantedportcathetersystemsforhepaticarterialinfusionofchemotherapyinpatientswithcolorectallivermetastasesaphaseiistudyandhistoricalcomparisonwiththesurgicalapproach
AT mierschalexandra interventionallyimplantedportcathetersystemsforhepaticarterialinfusionofchemotherapyinpatientswithcolorectallivermetastasesaphaseiistudyandhistoricalcomparisonwiththesurgicalapproach
AT felixroland interventionallyimplantedportcathetersystemsforhepaticarterialinfusionofchemotherapyinpatientswithcolorectallivermetastasesaphaseiistudyandhistoricalcomparisonwiththesurgicalapproach
AT neuhauspeter interventionallyimplantedportcathetersystemsforhepaticarterialinfusionofchemotherapyinpatientswithcolorectallivermetastasesaphaseiistudyandhistoricalcomparisonwiththesurgicalapproach
AT riesshanno interventionallyimplantedportcathetersystemsforhepaticarterialinfusionofchemotherapyinpatientswithcolorectallivermetastasesaphaseiistudyandhistoricalcomparisonwiththesurgicalapproach
AT dorkenbernd interventionallyimplantedportcathetersystemsforhepaticarterialinfusionofchemotherapyinpatientswithcolorectallivermetastasesaphaseiistudyandhistoricalcomparisonwiththesurgicalapproach
AT rickejens interventionallyimplantedportcathetersystemsforhepaticarterialinfusionofchemotherapyinpatientswithcolorectallivermetastasesaphaseiistudyandhistoricalcomparisonwiththesurgicalapproach