Cargando…
Artemether-Lumefantrine versus Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine for Treatment of Malaria: A Randomized Trial
OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of artemether-lumefantrine (AL) and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) for treating uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Uganda. DESIGN: Randomized single-blinded clinical trial. SETTING: Apac, Uganda, an area of very high malaria transmission intensity...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1876597/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17525792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pctr.0020020 |
_version_ | 1782133543886913536 |
---|---|
author | Kamya, Moses R Yeka, Adoke Bukirwa, Hasifa Lugemwa, Myers Rwakimari, John B Staedke, Sarah G Talisuna, Ambrose O Greenhouse, Bryan Nosten, François Rosenthal, Philip J Wabwire-Mangen, Fred Dorsey, Grant |
author_facet | Kamya, Moses R Yeka, Adoke Bukirwa, Hasifa Lugemwa, Myers Rwakimari, John B Staedke, Sarah G Talisuna, Ambrose O Greenhouse, Bryan Nosten, François Rosenthal, Philip J Wabwire-Mangen, Fred Dorsey, Grant |
author_sort | Kamya, Moses R |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of artemether-lumefantrine (AL) and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) for treating uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Uganda. DESIGN: Randomized single-blinded clinical trial. SETTING: Apac, Uganda, an area of very high malaria transmission intensity. PARTICIPANTS: Children aged 6 mo to 10 y with uncomplicated falciparum malaria. INTERVENTION: Treatment of malaria with AL or DP, each following standard 3-d dosing regimens. OUTCOME MEASURES: Risks of recurrent parasitemia at 28 and 42 d, unadjusted and adjusted by genotyping to distinguish recrudescences and new infections. RESULTS: Of 421 enrolled participants, 417 (99%) completed follow-up. The unadjusted risk of recurrent falciparum parasitemia was significantly lower for participants treated with DP than for those treated with AL after 28 d (11% versus 29%; risk difference [RD] 18%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 11%–26%) and 42 d (43% versus 53%; RD 9.6%, 95% CI 0%–19%) of follow-up. Similarly, the risk of recurrent parasitemia due to possible recrudescence (adjusted by genotyping) was significantly lower for participants treated with DP than for those treated with AL after 28 d (1.9% versus 8.9%; RD 7.0%, 95% CI 2.5%–12%) and 42 d (6.9% versus 16%; RD 9.5%, 95% CI 2.8%–16%). Patients treated with DP had a lower risk of recurrent parasitemia due to non-falciparum species, development of gametocytemia, and higher mean increase in hemoglobin compared to patients treated with AL. Both drugs were well tolerated; serious adverse events were uncommon and unrelated to study drugs. CONCLUSION: DP was superior to AL for reducing the risk of recurrent parasitemia and gametocytemia, and provided improved hemoglobin recovery. DP thus appears to be a good alternative to AL as first-line treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Uganda. To maximize the benefit of artemisinin-based combination therapy in Africa, treatment should be integrated with aggressive strategies to reduce malaria transmission intensity. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1876597 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-18765972007-05-24 Artemether-Lumefantrine versus Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine for Treatment of Malaria: A Randomized Trial Kamya, Moses R Yeka, Adoke Bukirwa, Hasifa Lugemwa, Myers Rwakimari, John B Staedke, Sarah G Talisuna, Ambrose O Greenhouse, Bryan Nosten, François Rosenthal, Philip J Wabwire-Mangen, Fred Dorsey, Grant PLoS Clin Trials Research Article OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of artemether-lumefantrine (AL) and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) for treating uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Uganda. DESIGN: Randomized single-blinded clinical trial. SETTING: Apac, Uganda, an area of very high malaria transmission intensity. PARTICIPANTS: Children aged 6 mo to 10 y with uncomplicated falciparum malaria. INTERVENTION: Treatment of malaria with AL or DP, each following standard 3-d dosing regimens. OUTCOME MEASURES: Risks of recurrent parasitemia at 28 and 42 d, unadjusted and adjusted by genotyping to distinguish recrudescences and new infections. RESULTS: Of 421 enrolled participants, 417 (99%) completed follow-up. The unadjusted risk of recurrent falciparum parasitemia was significantly lower for participants treated with DP than for those treated with AL after 28 d (11% versus 29%; risk difference [RD] 18%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 11%–26%) and 42 d (43% versus 53%; RD 9.6%, 95% CI 0%–19%) of follow-up. Similarly, the risk of recurrent parasitemia due to possible recrudescence (adjusted by genotyping) was significantly lower for participants treated with DP than for those treated with AL after 28 d (1.9% versus 8.9%; RD 7.0%, 95% CI 2.5%–12%) and 42 d (6.9% versus 16%; RD 9.5%, 95% CI 2.8%–16%). Patients treated with DP had a lower risk of recurrent parasitemia due to non-falciparum species, development of gametocytemia, and higher mean increase in hemoglobin compared to patients treated with AL. Both drugs were well tolerated; serious adverse events were uncommon and unrelated to study drugs. CONCLUSION: DP was superior to AL for reducing the risk of recurrent parasitemia and gametocytemia, and provided improved hemoglobin recovery. DP thus appears to be a good alternative to AL as first-line treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Uganda. To maximize the benefit of artemisinin-based combination therapy in Africa, treatment should be integrated with aggressive strategies to reduce malaria transmission intensity. Public Library of Science 2007-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC1876597/ /pubmed/17525792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pctr.0020020 Text en © 2007 Kamya et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kamya, Moses R Yeka, Adoke Bukirwa, Hasifa Lugemwa, Myers Rwakimari, John B Staedke, Sarah G Talisuna, Ambrose O Greenhouse, Bryan Nosten, François Rosenthal, Philip J Wabwire-Mangen, Fred Dorsey, Grant Artemether-Lumefantrine versus Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine for Treatment of Malaria: A Randomized Trial |
title | Artemether-Lumefantrine versus Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine for Treatment of Malaria: A Randomized Trial |
title_full | Artemether-Lumefantrine versus Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine for Treatment of Malaria: A Randomized Trial |
title_fullStr | Artemether-Lumefantrine versus Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine for Treatment of Malaria: A Randomized Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Artemether-Lumefantrine versus Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine for Treatment of Malaria: A Randomized Trial |
title_short | Artemether-Lumefantrine versus Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine for Treatment of Malaria: A Randomized Trial |
title_sort | artemether-lumefantrine versus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for treatment of malaria: a randomized trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1876597/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17525792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pctr.0020020 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kamyamosesr artemetherlumefantrineversusdihydroartemisininpiperaquinefortreatmentofmalariaarandomizedtrial AT yekaadoke artemetherlumefantrineversusdihydroartemisininpiperaquinefortreatmentofmalariaarandomizedtrial AT bukirwahasifa artemetherlumefantrineversusdihydroartemisininpiperaquinefortreatmentofmalariaarandomizedtrial AT lugemwamyers artemetherlumefantrineversusdihydroartemisininpiperaquinefortreatmentofmalariaarandomizedtrial AT rwakimarijohnb artemetherlumefantrineversusdihydroartemisininpiperaquinefortreatmentofmalariaarandomizedtrial AT staedkesarahg artemetherlumefantrineversusdihydroartemisininpiperaquinefortreatmentofmalariaarandomizedtrial AT talisunaambroseo artemetherlumefantrineversusdihydroartemisininpiperaquinefortreatmentofmalariaarandomizedtrial AT greenhousebryan artemetherlumefantrineversusdihydroartemisininpiperaquinefortreatmentofmalariaarandomizedtrial AT nostenfrancois artemetherlumefantrineversusdihydroartemisininpiperaquinefortreatmentofmalariaarandomizedtrial AT rosenthalphilipj artemetherlumefantrineversusdihydroartemisininpiperaquinefortreatmentofmalariaarandomizedtrial AT wabwiremangenfred artemetherlumefantrineversusdihydroartemisininpiperaquinefortreatmentofmalariaarandomizedtrial AT dorseygrant artemetherlumefantrineversusdihydroartemisininpiperaquinefortreatmentofmalariaarandomizedtrial |