Cargando…

Artemether-Lumefantrine versus Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine for Treatment of Malaria: A Randomized Trial

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of artemether-lumefantrine (AL) and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) for treating uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Uganda. DESIGN: Randomized single-blinded clinical trial. SETTING: Apac, Uganda, an area of very high malaria transmission intensity...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kamya, Moses R, Yeka, Adoke, Bukirwa, Hasifa, Lugemwa, Myers, Rwakimari, John B, Staedke, Sarah G, Talisuna, Ambrose O, Greenhouse, Bryan, Nosten, François, Rosenthal, Philip J, Wabwire-Mangen, Fred, Dorsey, Grant
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1876597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17525792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pctr.0020020
_version_ 1782133543886913536
author Kamya, Moses R
Yeka, Adoke
Bukirwa, Hasifa
Lugemwa, Myers
Rwakimari, John B
Staedke, Sarah G
Talisuna, Ambrose O
Greenhouse, Bryan
Nosten, François
Rosenthal, Philip J
Wabwire-Mangen, Fred
Dorsey, Grant
author_facet Kamya, Moses R
Yeka, Adoke
Bukirwa, Hasifa
Lugemwa, Myers
Rwakimari, John B
Staedke, Sarah G
Talisuna, Ambrose O
Greenhouse, Bryan
Nosten, François
Rosenthal, Philip J
Wabwire-Mangen, Fred
Dorsey, Grant
author_sort Kamya, Moses R
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of artemether-lumefantrine (AL) and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) for treating uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Uganda. DESIGN: Randomized single-blinded clinical trial. SETTING: Apac, Uganda, an area of very high malaria transmission intensity. PARTICIPANTS: Children aged 6 mo to 10 y with uncomplicated falciparum malaria. INTERVENTION: Treatment of malaria with AL or DP, each following standard 3-d dosing regimens. OUTCOME MEASURES: Risks of recurrent parasitemia at 28 and 42 d, unadjusted and adjusted by genotyping to distinguish recrudescences and new infections. RESULTS: Of 421 enrolled participants, 417 (99%) completed follow-up. The unadjusted risk of recurrent falciparum parasitemia was significantly lower for participants treated with DP than for those treated with AL after 28 d (11% versus 29%; risk difference [RD] 18%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 11%–26%) and 42 d (43% versus 53%; RD 9.6%, 95% CI 0%–19%) of follow-up. Similarly, the risk of recurrent parasitemia due to possible recrudescence (adjusted by genotyping) was significantly lower for participants treated with DP than for those treated with AL after 28 d (1.9% versus 8.9%; RD 7.0%, 95% CI 2.5%–12%) and 42 d (6.9% versus 16%; RD 9.5%, 95% CI 2.8%–16%). Patients treated with DP had a lower risk of recurrent parasitemia due to non-falciparum species, development of gametocytemia, and higher mean increase in hemoglobin compared to patients treated with AL. Both drugs were well tolerated; serious adverse events were uncommon and unrelated to study drugs. CONCLUSION: DP was superior to AL for reducing the risk of recurrent parasitemia and gametocytemia, and provided improved hemoglobin recovery. DP thus appears to be a good alternative to AL as first-line treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Uganda. To maximize the benefit of artemisinin-based combination therapy in Africa, treatment should be integrated with aggressive strategies to reduce malaria transmission intensity.
format Text
id pubmed-1876597
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-18765972007-05-24 Artemether-Lumefantrine versus Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine for Treatment of Malaria: A Randomized Trial Kamya, Moses R Yeka, Adoke Bukirwa, Hasifa Lugemwa, Myers Rwakimari, John B Staedke, Sarah G Talisuna, Ambrose O Greenhouse, Bryan Nosten, François Rosenthal, Philip J Wabwire-Mangen, Fred Dorsey, Grant PLoS Clin Trials Research Article OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of artemether-lumefantrine (AL) and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) for treating uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Uganda. DESIGN: Randomized single-blinded clinical trial. SETTING: Apac, Uganda, an area of very high malaria transmission intensity. PARTICIPANTS: Children aged 6 mo to 10 y with uncomplicated falciparum malaria. INTERVENTION: Treatment of malaria with AL or DP, each following standard 3-d dosing regimens. OUTCOME MEASURES: Risks of recurrent parasitemia at 28 and 42 d, unadjusted and adjusted by genotyping to distinguish recrudescences and new infections. RESULTS: Of 421 enrolled participants, 417 (99%) completed follow-up. The unadjusted risk of recurrent falciparum parasitemia was significantly lower for participants treated with DP than for those treated with AL after 28 d (11% versus 29%; risk difference [RD] 18%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 11%–26%) and 42 d (43% versus 53%; RD 9.6%, 95% CI 0%–19%) of follow-up. Similarly, the risk of recurrent parasitemia due to possible recrudescence (adjusted by genotyping) was significantly lower for participants treated with DP than for those treated with AL after 28 d (1.9% versus 8.9%; RD 7.0%, 95% CI 2.5%–12%) and 42 d (6.9% versus 16%; RD 9.5%, 95% CI 2.8%–16%). Patients treated with DP had a lower risk of recurrent parasitemia due to non-falciparum species, development of gametocytemia, and higher mean increase in hemoglobin compared to patients treated with AL. Both drugs were well tolerated; serious adverse events were uncommon and unrelated to study drugs. CONCLUSION: DP was superior to AL for reducing the risk of recurrent parasitemia and gametocytemia, and provided improved hemoglobin recovery. DP thus appears to be a good alternative to AL as first-line treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Uganda. To maximize the benefit of artemisinin-based combination therapy in Africa, treatment should be integrated with aggressive strategies to reduce malaria transmission intensity. Public Library of Science 2007-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC1876597/ /pubmed/17525792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pctr.0020020 Text en © 2007 Kamya et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kamya, Moses R
Yeka, Adoke
Bukirwa, Hasifa
Lugemwa, Myers
Rwakimari, John B
Staedke, Sarah G
Talisuna, Ambrose O
Greenhouse, Bryan
Nosten, François
Rosenthal, Philip J
Wabwire-Mangen, Fred
Dorsey, Grant
Artemether-Lumefantrine versus Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine for Treatment of Malaria: A Randomized Trial
title Artemether-Lumefantrine versus Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine for Treatment of Malaria: A Randomized Trial
title_full Artemether-Lumefantrine versus Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine for Treatment of Malaria: A Randomized Trial
title_fullStr Artemether-Lumefantrine versus Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine for Treatment of Malaria: A Randomized Trial
title_full_unstemmed Artemether-Lumefantrine versus Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine for Treatment of Malaria: A Randomized Trial
title_short Artemether-Lumefantrine versus Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine for Treatment of Malaria: A Randomized Trial
title_sort artemether-lumefantrine versus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for treatment of malaria: a randomized trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1876597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17525792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pctr.0020020
work_keys_str_mv AT kamyamosesr artemetherlumefantrineversusdihydroartemisininpiperaquinefortreatmentofmalariaarandomizedtrial
AT yekaadoke artemetherlumefantrineversusdihydroartemisininpiperaquinefortreatmentofmalariaarandomizedtrial
AT bukirwahasifa artemetherlumefantrineversusdihydroartemisininpiperaquinefortreatmentofmalariaarandomizedtrial
AT lugemwamyers artemetherlumefantrineversusdihydroartemisininpiperaquinefortreatmentofmalariaarandomizedtrial
AT rwakimarijohnb artemetherlumefantrineversusdihydroartemisininpiperaquinefortreatmentofmalariaarandomizedtrial
AT staedkesarahg artemetherlumefantrineversusdihydroartemisininpiperaquinefortreatmentofmalariaarandomizedtrial
AT talisunaambroseo artemetherlumefantrineversusdihydroartemisininpiperaquinefortreatmentofmalariaarandomizedtrial
AT greenhousebryan artemetherlumefantrineversusdihydroartemisininpiperaquinefortreatmentofmalariaarandomizedtrial
AT nostenfrancois artemetherlumefantrineversusdihydroartemisininpiperaquinefortreatmentofmalariaarandomizedtrial
AT rosenthalphilipj artemetherlumefantrineversusdihydroartemisininpiperaquinefortreatmentofmalariaarandomizedtrial
AT wabwiremangenfred artemetherlumefantrineversusdihydroartemisininpiperaquinefortreatmentofmalariaarandomizedtrial
AT dorseygrant artemetherlumefantrineversusdihydroartemisininpiperaquinefortreatmentofmalariaarandomizedtrial