Cargando…

Developmental biologists' choice of subjects approximates to a power law, with no evidence for the existence of a special group of 'model organisms'

BACKGROUND: This report describes an unexpected aspect of the structure and development of developmental biology research, rather than the development of a specific embryo. Descriptions of modern developmental biology emphasize investigators' concentration on a small number of 'model'...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Davies, Jamie A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1877084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17472742
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-213X-7-40
_version_ 1782133561094045696
author Davies, Jamie A
author_facet Davies, Jamie A
author_sort Davies, Jamie A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This report describes an unexpected aspect of the structure and development of developmental biology research, rather than the development of a specific embryo. Descriptions of modern developmental biology emphasize investigators' concentration on a small number of 'model' organisms and it is assumed that a clear division exists between the attention paid to these 'model' organisms and that paid to other species. This report describes a quantitative analysis of the organisms that were the subjects of studies reported in developmental biology journals published in the years 1965, 1975, 1985, 1995 and 2005, chosen to represent five decades of modern developmental biology. RESULTS: The results demonstrate that the distribution of attention paid to different organisms has a smooth distribution that approximates to a scale-free power law, in which there is no clear discontinuity that divides organisms into 'models' and the rest. This is true for both individual years and for the aggregate of all years' data. In other systems (eg connections in the World Wide Web), such power-law distributions arise from mechanisms of preferential attachment ('the rich get richer'). Detailed analysis of the progress of different organisms over the years under study shows that, while preferential attachment may be part of the mechanism that generates the power law distribution, it is insufficient to explain it. CONCLUSION: The smoothness of the distribution suggests that there is no empirical basis for dividing species under study into 'model' organisms and 'the rest', and that the widely-held view about organism choice in developmental biology is distorted.
format Text
id pubmed-1877084
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-18770842007-05-25 Developmental biologists' choice of subjects approximates to a power law, with no evidence for the existence of a special group of 'model organisms' Davies, Jamie A BMC Dev Biol Correspondence BACKGROUND: This report describes an unexpected aspect of the structure and development of developmental biology research, rather than the development of a specific embryo. Descriptions of modern developmental biology emphasize investigators' concentration on a small number of 'model' organisms and it is assumed that a clear division exists between the attention paid to these 'model' organisms and that paid to other species. This report describes a quantitative analysis of the organisms that were the subjects of studies reported in developmental biology journals published in the years 1965, 1975, 1985, 1995 and 2005, chosen to represent five decades of modern developmental biology. RESULTS: The results demonstrate that the distribution of attention paid to different organisms has a smooth distribution that approximates to a scale-free power law, in which there is no clear discontinuity that divides organisms into 'models' and the rest. This is true for both individual years and for the aggregate of all years' data. In other systems (eg connections in the World Wide Web), such power-law distributions arise from mechanisms of preferential attachment ('the rich get richer'). Detailed analysis of the progress of different organisms over the years under study shows that, while preferential attachment may be part of the mechanism that generates the power law distribution, it is insufficient to explain it. CONCLUSION: The smoothness of the distribution suggests that there is no empirical basis for dividing species under study into 'model' organisms and 'the rest', and that the widely-held view about organism choice in developmental biology is distorted. BioMed Central 2007-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC1877084/ /pubmed/17472742 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-213X-7-40 Text en Copyright © 2007 Davies; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Correspondence
Davies, Jamie A
Developmental biologists' choice of subjects approximates to a power law, with no evidence for the existence of a special group of 'model organisms'
title Developmental biologists' choice of subjects approximates to a power law, with no evidence for the existence of a special group of 'model organisms'
title_full Developmental biologists' choice of subjects approximates to a power law, with no evidence for the existence of a special group of 'model organisms'
title_fullStr Developmental biologists' choice of subjects approximates to a power law, with no evidence for the existence of a special group of 'model organisms'
title_full_unstemmed Developmental biologists' choice of subjects approximates to a power law, with no evidence for the existence of a special group of 'model organisms'
title_short Developmental biologists' choice of subjects approximates to a power law, with no evidence for the existence of a special group of 'model organisms'
title_sort developmental biologists' choice of subjects approximates to a power law, with no evidence for the existence of a special group of 'model organisms'
topic Correspondence
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1877084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17472742
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-213X-7-40
work_keys_str_mv AT daviesjamiea developmentalbiologistschoiceofsubjectsapproximatestoapowerlawwithnoevidencefortheexistenceofaspecialgroupofmodelorganisms