Cargando…

The use of CAM and conventional treatments among primary care consulters with chronic musculoskeletal pain

BACKGROUND: Chronic musculoskeletal pain is the single most cited reason for use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Primary care is the most frequent conventional medical service used by patients with pain in the UK. We are unaware, however, of a direct evidence of the extent of CAM us...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Artus, Majid, Croft, Peter, Lewis, Martyn
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1878478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17480212
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-8-26
_version_ 1782133575288619008
author Artus, Majid
Croft, Peter
Lewis, Martyn
author_facet Artus, Majid
Croft, Peter
Lewis, Martyn
author_sort Artus, Majid
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chronic musculoskeletal pain is the single most cited reason for use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Primary care is the most frequent conventional medical service used by patients with pain in the UK. We are unaware, however, of a direct evidence of the extent of CAM use by primary care patients, and how successful they perceive it to be. METHODS: AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To determine CAM use among patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain who have consulted about their pain in primary care. STUDY DESIGN: Face-to-face interview-based survey. SETTING: Three general practices in North Staffordshire. PARTICIPANTS: Respondents to a population pain survey who had reported having musculoskeletal pain in the survey and who had consulted about their pain in primary care in the previous 12 months as well as consenting to further research and agreeing to an interview. Information was gathered about their pain and the use of all treatments for pain, including CAM, in the previous year. RESULTS: 138 interviews were completed. 116 participants (84%) had used at least one CAM treatment for pain in the previous year. 65% were current users of CAM. The ratio of over-the-counter CAM use to care from a CAM provider was 3:2. 111 participants (80%) had used conventional treatment. 95 (69%) were using a combination of CAM and conventional treatment. Glucosamine and fish oil were the most commonly used CAM treatments (38%, 35% respectively). Most CAM treatments were scored on average as being helpful, and users indicated that they intended to use again 87% of the CAM treatments they had already used. CONCLUSION: We provide direct evidence that most primary care consulters with chronic musculoskeletal pain have used CAM in the previous year, usually in combination with conventional treatments. The high prevalence and wide range of users experiences of benefit and harm from CAM strengthen the argument for more research into this type of medicine to quantify benefit and assess safety. The observation that most users of conventional medicine also used CAM suggests a continuing need for more investigation of effective pain management in primary care.
format Text
id pubmed-1878478
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-18784782007-05-29 The use of CAM and conventional treatments among primary care consulters with chronic musculoskeletal pain Artus, Majid Croft, Peter Lewis, Martyn BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Chronic musculoskeletal pain is the single most cited reason for use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Primary care is the most frequent conventional medical service used by patients with pain in the UK. We are unaware, however, of a direct evidence of the extent of CAM use by primary care patients, and how successful they perceive it to be. METHODS: AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To determine CAM use among patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain who have consulted about their pain in primary care. STUDY DESIGN: Face-to-face interview-based survey. SETTING: Three general practices in North Staffordshire. PARTICIPANTS: Respondents to a population pain survey who had reported having musculoskeletal pain in the survey and who had consulted about their pain in primary care in the previous 12 months as well as consenting to further research and agreeing to an interview. Information was gathered about their pain and the use of all treatments for pain, including CAM, in the previous year. RESULTS: 138 interviews were completed. 116 participants (84%) had used at least one CAM treatment for pain in the previous year. 65% were current users of CAM. The ratio of over-the-counter CAM use to care from a CAM provider was 3:2. 111 participants (80%) had used conventional treatment. 95 (69%) were using a combination of CAM and conventional treatment. Glucosamine and fish oil were the most commonly used CAM treatments (38%, 35% respectively). Most CAM treatments were scored on average as being helpful, and users indicated that they intended to use again 87% of the CAM treatments they had already used. CONCLUSION: We provide direct evidence that most primary care consulters with chronic musculoskeletal pain have used CAM in the previous year, usually in combination with conventional treatments. The high prevalence and wide range of users experiences of benefit and harm from CAM strengthen the argument for more research into this type of medicine to quantify benefit and assess safety. The observation that most users of conventional medicine also used CAM suggests a continuing need for more investigation of effective pain management in primary care. BioMed Central 2007-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC1878478/ /pubmed/17480212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-8-26 Text en Copyright © 2007 Artus et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Artus, Majid
Croft, Peter
Lewis, Martyn
The use of CAM and conventional treatments among primary care consulters with chronic musculoskeletal pain
title The use of CAM and conventional treatments among primary care consulters with chronic musculoskeletal pain
title_full The use of CAM and conventional treatments among primary care consulters with chronic musculoskeletal pain
title_fullStr The use of CAM and conventional treatments among primary care consulters with chronic musculoskeletal pain
title_full_unstemmed The use of CAM and conventional treatments among primary care consulters with chronic musculoskeletal pain
title_short The use of CAM and conventional treatments among primary care consulters with chronic musculoskeletal pain
title_sort use of cam and conventional treatments among primary care consulters with chronic musculoskeletal pain
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1878478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17480212
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-8-26
work_keys_str_mv AT artusmajid theuseofcamandconventionaltreatmentsamongprimarycareconsulterswithchronicmusculoskeletalpain
AT croftpeter theuseofcamandconventionaltreatmentsamongprimarycareconsulterswithchronicmusculoskeletalpain
AT lewismartyn theuseofcamandconventionaltreatmentsamongprimarycareconsulterswithchronicmusculoskeletalpain
AT artusmajid useofcamandconventionaltreatmentsamongprimarycareconsulterswithchronicmusculoskeletalpain
AT croftpeter useofcamandconventionaltreatmentsamongprimarycareconsulterswithchronicmusculoskeletalpain
AT lewismartyn useofcamandconventionaltreatmentsamongprimarycareconsulterswithchronicmusculoskeletalpain