Cargando…
An Open Randomized Comparison of Gatifloxacin versus Cefixime for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Enteric Fever
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of gatifloxacin versus cefixime in the treatment of uncomplicated culture positive enteric fever. DESIGN: A randomized, open-label, active control trial with two parallel arms. SETTING: Emergency Room and Outpatient Clinics in Patan Hospital, Lagankhel, Lalitpur, Ne...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1891439/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17593957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000542 |
_version_ | 1782133759423807488 |
---|---|
author | Pandit, Anil Arjyal, Amit Day, Jeremy N. Paudyal, Buddhi Dangol, Sabina Zimmerman, Mark D. Yadav, Bharat Stepniewska, Kasia Campbell, James I. Dolecek, Christiane Farrar, Jeremy J. Basnyat, Buddha |
author_facet | Pandit, Anil Arjyal, Amit Day, Jeremy N. Paudyal, Buddhi Dangol, Sabina Zimmerman, Mark D. Yadav, Bharat Stepniewska, Kasia Campbell, James I. Dolecek, Christiane Farrar, Jeremy J. Basnyat, Buddha |
author_sort | Pandit, Anil |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of gatifloxacin versus cefixime in the treatment of uncomplicated culture positive enteric fever. DESIGN: A randomized, open-label, active control trial with two parallel arms. SETTING: Emergency Room and Outpatient Clinics in Patan Hospital, Lagankhel, Lalitpur, Nepal. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with clinically diagnosed uncomplicated enteric fever meeting the inclusion criteria. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were allocated to receive one of two drugs, Gatifloxacin or Cefixime. The dosages used were Gatifloxacin 10 mg/kg, given once daily for 7 days, or Cefixime 20 mg/kg/day given in two divided doses for 7 days. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was fever clearance time. The secondary outcome measure was overall treatment failure (acute treatment failure and relapse). RESULTS: Randomization was carried out in 390 patients before enrollment was suspended on the advice of the independent data safety monitoring board due to significant differences in both primary and secondary outcome measures in the two arms and the attainment of a priori defined endpoints. Median (95% confidence interval) fever clearance times were 92 hours (84–114 hours) for gatifloxacin recipients and 138 hours (105–164 hours) for cefixime-treated patients (Hazard Ratio[95%CI] = 2.171 [1.545–3.051], p<0.0001). 19 out of 70 (27%) patients who completed the 7 day trial had acute clinical failure in the cefixime group as compared to 1 out of 88 patients (1%) in gatifloxacin group(Odds Ratio [95%CI] = 0.031 [0.004 – 0.237], p<0.001). Overall treatment failure patients (relapsed patients plus acute treatment failure patients plus death) numbered 29. They were determined to be (95% confidence interval) 37.6 % (27.14%–50.2%) in the cefixime group and 3.5% (2.2%–11.5%) in the gatifloxacin group (HR[95%CI] = 0.084 [0.025–0.280], p<0.0001). There was one death in the cefixime group. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this study, gatifloxacin is a better treatment for uncomplicated enteric fever as compared to cefixime. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN75784880 |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1891439 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-18914392007-06-27 An Open Randomized Comparison of Gatifloxacin versus Cefixime for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Enteric Fever Pandit, Anil Arjyal, Amit Day, Jeremy N. Paudyal, Buddhi Dangol, Sabina Zimmerman, Mark D. Yadav, Bharat Stepniewska, Kasia Campbell, James I. Dolecek, Christiane Farrar, Jeremy J. Basnyat, Buddha PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of gatifloxacin versus cefixime in the treatment of uncomplicated culture positive enteric fever. DESIGN: A randomized, open-label, active control trial with two parallel arms. SETTING: Emergency Room and Outpatient Clinics in Patan Hospital, Lagankhel, Lalitpur, Nepal. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with clinically diagnosed uncomplicated enteric fever meeting the inclusion criteria. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were allocated to receive one of two drugs, Gatifloxacin or Cefixime. The dosages used were Gatifloxacin 10 mg/kg, given once daily for 7 days, or Cefixime 20 mg/kg/day given in two divided doses for 7 days. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was fever clearance time. The secondary outcome measure was overall treatment failure (acute treatment failure and relapse). RESULTS: Randomization was carried out in 390 patients before enrollment was suspended on the advice of the independent data safety monitoring board due to significant differences in both primary and secondary outcome measures in the two arms and the attainment of a priori defined endpoints. Median (95% confidence interval) fever clearance times were 92 hours (84–114 hours) for gatifloxacin recipients and 138 hours (105–164 hours) for cefixime-treated patients (Hazard Ratio[95%CI] = 2.171 [1.545–3.051], p<0.0001). 19 out of 70 (27%) patients who completed the 7 day trial had acute clinical failure in the cefixime group as compared to 1 out of 88 patients (1%) in gatifloxacin group(Odds Ratio [95%CI] = 0.031 [0.004 – 0.237], p<0.001). Overall treatment failure patients (relapsed patients plus acute treatment failure patients plus death) numbered 29. They were determined to be (95% confidence interval) 37.6 % (27.14%–50.2%) in the cefixime group and 3.5% (2.2%–11.5%) in the gatifloxacin group (HR[95%CI] = 0.084 [0.025–0.280], p<0.0001). There was one death in the cefixime group. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this study, gatifloxacin is a better treatment for uncomplicated enteric fever as compared to cefixime. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN75784880 Public Library of Science 2007-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC1891439/ /pubmed/17593957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000542 Text en Pandit et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Pandit, Anil Arjyal, Amit Day, Jeremy N. Paudyal, Buddhi Dangol, Sabina Zimmerman, Mark D. Yadav, Bharat Stepniewska, Kasia Campbell, James I. Dolecek, Christiane Farrar, Jeremy J. Basnyat, Buddha An Open Randomized Comparison of Gatifloxacin versus Cefixime for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Enteric Fever |
title | An Open Randomized Comparison of Gatifloxacin versus Cefixime for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Enteric Fever |
title_full | An Open Randomized Comparison of Gatifloxacin versus Cefixime for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Enteric Fever |
title_fullStr | An Open Randomized Comparison of Gatifloxacin versus Cefixime for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Enteric Fever |
title_full_unstemmed | An Open Randomized Comparison of Gatifloxacin versus Cefixime for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Enteric Fever |
title_short | An Open Randomized Comparison of Gatifloxacin versus Cefixime for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Enteric Fever |
title_sort | open randomized comparison of gatifloxacin versus cefixime for the treatment of uncomplicated enteric fever |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1891439/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17593957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000542 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT panditanil anopenrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever AT arjyalamit anopenrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever AT dayjeremyn anopenrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever AT paudyalbuddhi anopenrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever AT dangolsabina anopenrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever AT zimmermanmarkd anopenrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever AT yadavbharat anopenrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever AT stepniewskakasia anopenrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever AT campbelljamesi anopenrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever AT dolecekchristiane anopenrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever AT farrarjeremyj anopenrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever AT basnyatbuddha anopenrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever AT panditanil openrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever AT arjyalamit openrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever AT dayjeremyn openrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever AT paudyalbuddhi openrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever AT dangolsabina openrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever AT zimmermanmarkd openrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever AT yadavbharat openrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever AT stepniewskakasia openrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever AT campbelljamesi openrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever AT dolecekchristiane openrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever AT farrarjeremyj openrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever AT basnyatbuddha openrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever |