Cargando…

An Open Randomized Comparison of Gatifloxacin versus Cefixime for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Enteric Fever

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of gatifloxacin versus cefixime in the treatment of uncomplicated culture positive enteric fever. DESIGN: A randomized, open-label, active control trial with two parallel arms. SETTING: Emergency Room and Outpatient Clinics in Patan Hospital, Lagankhel, Lalitpur, Ne...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pandit, Anil, Arjyal, Amit, Day, Jeremy N., Paudyal, Buddhi, Dangol, Sabina, Zimmerman, Mark D., Yadav, Bharat, Stepniewska, Kasia, Campbell, James I., Dolecek, Christiane, Farrar, Jeremy J., Basnyat, Buddha
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1891439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17593957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000542
_version_ 1782133759423807488
author Pandit, Anil
Arjyal, Amit
Day, Jeremy N.
Paudyal, Buddhi
Dangol, Sabina
Zimmerman, Mark D.
Yadav, Bharat
Stepniewska, Kasia
Campbell, James I.
Dolecek, Christiane
Farrar, Jeremy J.
Basnyat, Buddha
author_facet Pandit, Anil
Arjyal, Amit
Day, Jeremy N.
Paudyal, Buddhi
Dangol, Sabina
Zimmerman, Mark D.
Yadav, Bharat
Stepniewska, Kasia
Campbell, James I.
Dolecek, Christiane
Farrar, Jeremy J.
Basnyat, Buddha
author_sort Pandit, Anil
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of gatifloxacin versus cefixime in the treatment of uncomplicated culture positive enteric fever. DESIGN: A randomized, open-label, active control trial with two parallel arms. SETTING: Emergency Room and Outpatient Clinics in Patan Hospital, Lagankhel, Lalitpur, Nepal. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with clinically diagnosed uncomplicated enteric fever meeting the inclusion criteria. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were allocated to receive one of two drugs, Gatifloxacin or Cefixime. The dosages used were Gatifloxacin 10 mg/kg, given once daily for 7 days, or Cefixime 20 mg/kg/day given in two divided doses for 7 days. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was fever clearance time. The secondary outcome measure was overall treatment failure (acute treatment failure and relapse). RESULTS: Randomization was carried out in 390 patients before enrollment was suspended on the advice of the independent data safety monitoring board due to significant differences in both primary and secondary outcome measures in the two arms and the attainment of a priori defined endpoints. Median (95% confidence interval) fever clearance times were 92 hours (84–114 hours) for gatifloxacin recipients and 138 hours (105–164 hours) for cefixime-treated patients (Hazard Ratio[95%CI] = 2.171 [1.545–3.051], p<0.0001). 19 out of 70 (27%) patients who completed the 7 day trial had acute clinical failure in the cefixime group as compared to 1 out of 88 patients (1%) in gatifloxacin group(Odds Ratio [95%CI] = 0.031 [0.004 – 0.237], p<0.001). Overall treatment failure patients (relapsed patients plus acute treatment failure patients plus death) numbered 29. They were determined to be (95% confidence interval) 37.6 % (27.14%–50.2%) in the cefixime group and 3.5% (2.2%–11.5%) in the gatifloxacin group (HR[95%CI] = 0.084 [0.025–0.280], p<0.0001). There was one death in the cefixime group. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this study, gatifloxacin is a better treatment for uncomplicated enteric fever as compared to cefixime. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN75784880
format Text
id pubmed-1891439
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-18914392007-06-27 An Open Randomized Comparison of Gatifloxacin versus Cefixime for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Enteric Fever Pandit, Anil Arjyal, Amit Day, Jeremy N. Paudyal, Buddhi Dangol, Sabina Zimmerman, Mark D. Yadav, Bharat Stepniewska, Kasia Campbell, James I. Dolecek, Christiane Farrar, Jeremy J. Basnyat, Buddha PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of gatifloxacin versus cefixime in the treatment of uncomplicated culture positive enteric fever. DESIGN: A randomized, open-label, active control trial with two parallel arms. SETTING: Emergency Room and Outpatient Clinics in Patan Hospital, Lagankhel, Lalitpur, Nepal. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with clinically diagnosed uncomplicated enteric fever meeting the inclusion criteria. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were allocated to receive one of two drugs, Gatifloxacin or Cefixime. The dosages used were Gatifloxacin 10 mg/kg, given once daily for 7 days, or Cefixime 20 mg/kg/day given in two divided doses for 7 days. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was fever clearance time. The secondary outcome measure was overall treatment failure (acute treatment failure and relapse). RESULTS: Randomization was carried out in 390 patients before enrollment was suspended on the advice of the independent data safety monitoring board due to significant differences in both primary and secondary outcome measures in the two arms and the attainment of a priori defined endpoints. Median (95% confidence interval) fever clearance times were 92 hours (84–114 hours) for gatifloxacin recipients and 138 hours (105–164 hours) for cefixime-treated patients (Hazard Ratio[95%CI] = 2.171 [1.545–3.051], p<0.0001). 19 out of 70 (27%) patients who completed the 7 day trial had acute clinical failure in the cefixime group as compared to 1 out of 88 patients (1%) in gatifloxacin group(Odds Ratio [95%CI] = 0.031 [0.004 – 0.237], p<0.001). Overall treatment failure patients (relapsed patients plus acute treatment failure patients plus death) numbered 29. They were determined to be (95% confidence interval) 37.6 % (27.14%–50.2%) in the cefixime group and 3.5% (2.2%–11.5%) in the gatifloxacin group (HR[95%CI] = 0.084 [0.025–0.280], p<0.0001). There was one death in the cefixime group. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this study, gatifloxacin is a better treatment for uncomplicated enteric fever as compared to cefixime. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN75784880 Public Library of Science 2007-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC1891439/ /pubmed/17593957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000542 Text en Pandit et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pandit, Anil
Arjyal, Amit
Day, Jeremy N.
Paudyal, Buddhi
Dangol, Sabina
Zimmerman, Mark D.
Yadav, Bharat
Stepniewska, Kasia
Campbell, James I.
Dolecek, Christiane
Farrar, Jeremy J.
Basnyat, Buddha
An Open Randomized Comparison of Gatifloxacin versus Cefixime for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Enteric Fever
title An Open Randomized Comparison of Gatifloxacin versus Cefixime for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Enteric Fever
title_full An Open Randomized Comparison of Gatifloxacin versus Cefixime for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Enteric Fever
title_fullStr An Open Randomized Comparison of Gatifloxacin versus Cefixime for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Enteric Fever
title_full_unstemmed An Open Randomized Comparison of Gatifloxacin versus Cefixime for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Enteric Fever
title_short An Open Randomized Comparison of Gatifloxacin versus Cefixime for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Enteric Fever
title_sort open randomized comparison of gatifloxacin versus cefixime for the treatment of uncomplicated enteric fever
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1891439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17593957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000542
work_keys_str_mv AT panditanil anopenrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever
AT arjyalamit anopenrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever
AT dayjeremyn anopenrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever
AT paudyalbuddhi anopenrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever
AT dangolsabina anopenrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever
AT zimmermanmarkd anopenrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever
AT yadavbharat anopenrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever
AT stepniewskakasia anopenrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever
AT campbelljamesi anopenrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever
AT dolecekchristiane anopenrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever
AT farrarjeremyj anopenrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever
AT basnyatbuddha anopenrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever
AT panditanil openrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever
AT arjyalamit openrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever
AT dayjeremyn openrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever
AT paudyalbuddhi openrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever
AT dangolsabina openrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever
AT zimmermanmarkd openrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever
AT yadavbharat openrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever
AT stepniewskakasia openrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever
AT campbelljamesi openrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever
AT dolecekchristiane openrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever
AT farrarjeremyj openrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever
AT basnyatbuddha openrandomizedcomparisonofgatifloxacinversuscefiximeforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedentericfever