Cargando…

Comparative analysis of various gene finders specific to Caenorhabditis elegans genome

Computational gene prediction and identifying alternatively spliced isoforms have always been a challenging task. In this paper, we describe the performance of three gene/exon finding programmes namely Fex, Gen view2 and Gene builder capable of predicting open reading frames or exons for a given set...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kashyap, Luv, Tabish, Mohammad
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Biomedical Informatics Publishing Group 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1891687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17597889
_version_ 1782133776859529216
author Kashyap, Luv
Tabish, Mohammad
author_facet Kashyap, Luv
Tabish, Mohammad
author_sort Kashyap, Luv
collection PubMed
description Computational gene prediction and identifying alternatively spliced isoforms have always been a challenging task. In this paper, we describe the performance of three gene/exon finding programmes namely Fex, Gen view2 and Gene builder capable of predicting open reading frames or exons for a given set of sequences from C. elegans genome. The predicted exons were compared with the ‘sequencing consortium’ identified exons and degree of consensus among them is discussed. We found that exon prediction by Fex was similar to the consortium prediction as compared to Gen view2 and Gene builder results. Interestingly, some exons (six exons in five genes) predicted positive only by Fex and not by the ‘sequencing consortium’ are found at the C. elegans EST database. This data is critical for further debate and discussion on gene finding in C. elegans.
format Text
id pubmed-1891687
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher Biomedical Informatics Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-18916872007-06-27 Comparative analysis of various gene finders specific to Caenorhabditis elegans genome Kashyap, Luv Tabish, Mohammad Bioinformation Hypothesis Computational gene prediction and identifying alternatively spliced isoforms have always been a challenging task. In this paper, we describe the performance of three gene/exon finding programmes namely Fex, Gen view2 and Gene builder capable of predicting open reading frames or exons for a given set of sequences from C. elegans genome. The predicted exons were compared with the ‘sequencing consortium’ identified exons and degree of consensus among them is discussed. We found that exon prediction by Fex was similar to the consortium prediction as compared to Gen view2 and Gene builder results. Interestingly, some exons (six exons in five genes) predicted positive only by Fex and not by the ‘sequencing consortium’ are found at the C. elegans EST database. This data is critical for further debate and discussion on gene finding in C. elegans. Biomedical Informatics Publishing Group 2006-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC1891687/ /pubmed/17597889 Text en © 2005 Biomedical Informatics Publishing Group This is an open-access article, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Hypothesis
Kashyap, Luv
Tabish, Mohammad
Comparative analysis of various gene finders specific to Caenorhabditis elegans genome
title Comparative analysis of various gene finders specific to Caenorhabditis elegans genome
title_full Comparative analysis of various gene finders specific to Caenorhabditis elegans genome
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of various gene finders specific to Caenorhabditis elegans genome
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of various gene finders specific to Caenorhabditis elegans genome
title_short Comparative analysis of various gene finders specific to Caenorhabditis elegans genome
title_sort comparative analysis of various gene finders specific to caenorhabditis elegans genome
topic Hypothesis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1891687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17597889
work_keys_str_mv AT kashyapluv comparativeanalysisofvariousgenefindersspecifictocaenorhabditiselegansgenome
AT tabishmohammad comparativeanalysisofvariousgenefindersspecifictocaenorhabditiselegansgenome