Cargando…
Osteoblastic flare in a patient with advanced gastric cancer after treatment with pemetrexed and oxaliplatin: implications for response assessment with RECIST criteria
BACKGROUND: The RECIST guidelines are commonly used in phase II and III clinical trials. The correct definition of response can be controversial in some situations, as in the case we describe. CASE PRESENTATION: A 43 year-old man with advanced gastric cancer was enrolled in a phase II trial where he...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1896169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17540044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-7-94 |
_version_ | 1782133920307871744 |
---|---|
author | Amoroso, Vito Pittiani, Frida Grisanti, Salvatore Valcamonico, Francesca Simoncini, Edda Ferrari, Vittorio D Marini, Giovanni |
author_facet | Amoroso, Vito Pittiani, Frida Grisanti, Salvatore Valcamonico, Francesca Simoncini, Edda Ferrari, Vittorio D Marini, Giovanni |
author_sort | Amoroso, Vito |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The RECIST guidelines are commonly used in phase II and III clinical trials. The correct definition of response can be controversial in some situations, as in the case we describe. CASE PRESENTATION: A 43 year-old man with advanced gastric cancer was enrolled in a phase II trial where he was treated with pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2 )plus oxaliplatin 120 mg/m(2 )every 3 weeks. At baseline, the target lesions were lymph-nodes, and the non-target lesions were small pulmonary nodules. At first re-evaluation, the target lesions showed partial response and the non-target lesions showed complete response, but new diffuse osteoblastic lesions appeared. The investigator decided to continue treatment until the second re-evaluation. CT scan confirmed the response of the target and non-target lesions, while the osteoblastic lesions did not change. CONCLUSION: The appearance of osteoblastic lesions after an active antitumor treatment, a phenomenon known as flare, can complicate the definition of the best overall response using RECIST criteria. This possibility should be considered by oncologists involved in clinical trials. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1896169 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-18961692007-06-23 Osteoblastic flare in a patient with advanced gastric cancer after treatment with pemetrexed and oxaliplatin: implications for response assessment with RECIST criteria Amoroso, Vito Pittiani, Frida Grisanti, Salvatore Valcamonico, Francesca Simoncini, Edda Ferrari, Vittorio D Marini, Giovanni BMC Cancer Case Report BACKGROUND: The RECIST guidelines are commonly used in phase II and III clinical trials. The correct definition of response can be controversial in some situations, as in the case we describe. CASE PRESENTATION: A 43 year-old man with advanced gastric cancer was enrolled in a phase II trial where he was treated with pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2 )plus oxaliplatin 120 mg/m(2 )every 3 weeks. At baseline, the target lesions were lymph-nodes, and the non-target lesions were small pulmonary nodules. At first re-evaluation, the target lesions showed partial response and the non-target lesions showed complete response, but new diffuse osteoblastic lesions appeared. The investigator decided to continue treatment until the second re-evaluation. CT scan confirmed the response of the target and non-target lesions, while the osteoblastic lesions did not change. CONCLUSION: The appearance of osteoblastic lesions after an active antitumor treatment, a phenomenon known as flare, can complicate the definition of the best overall response using RECIST criteria. This possibility should be considered by oncologists involved in clinical trials. BioMed Central 2007-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC1896169/ /pubmed/17540044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-7-94 Text en Copyright © 2007 Amoroso et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Case Report Amoroso, Vito Pittiani, Frida Grisanti, Salvatore Valcamonico, Francesca Simoncini, Edda Ferrari, Vittorio D Marini, Giovanni Osteoblastic flare in a patient with advanced gastric cancer after treatment with pemetrexed and oxaliplatin: implications for response assessment with RECIST criteria |
title | Osteoblastic flare in a patient with advanced gastric cancer after treatment with pemetrexed and oxaliplatin: implications for response assessment with RECIST criteria |
title_full | Osteoblastic flare in a patient with advanced gastric cancer after treatment with pemetrexed and oxaliplatin: implications for response assessment with RECIST criteria |
title_fullStr | Osteoblastic flare in a patient with advanced gastric cancer after treatment with pemetrexed and oxaliplatin: implications for response assessment with RECIST criteria |
title_full_unstemmed | Osteoblastic flare in a patient with advanced gastric cancer after treatment with pemetrexed and oxaliplatin: implications for response assessment with RECIST criteria |
title_short | Osteoblastic flare in a patient with advanced gastric cancer after treatment with pemetrexed and oxaliplatin: implications for response assessment with RECIST criteria |
title_sort | osteoblastic flare in a patient with advanced gastric cancer after treatment with pemetrexed and oxaliplatin: implications for response assessment with recist criteria |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1896169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17540044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-7-94 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT amorosovito osteoblasticflareinapatientwithadvancedgastriccanceraftertreatmentwithpemetrexedandoxaliplatinimplicationsforresponseassessmentwithrecistcriteria AT pittianifrida osteoblasticflareinapatientwithadvancedgastriccanceraftertreatmentwithpemetrexedandoxaliplatinimplicationsforresponseassessmentwithrecistcriteria AT grisantisalvatore osteoblasticflareinapatientwithadvancedgastriccanceraftertreatmentwithpemetrexedandoxaliplatinimplicationsforresponseassessmentwithrecistcriteria AT valcamonicofrancesca osteoblasticflareinapatientwithadvancedgastriccanceraftertreatmentwithpemetrexedandoxaliplatinimplicationsforresponseassessmentwithrecistcriteria AT simonciniedda osteoblasticflareinapatientwithadvancedgastriccanceraftertreatmentwithpemetrexedandoxaliplatinimplicationsforresponseassessmentwithrecistcriteria AT ferrarivittoriod osteoblasticflareinapatientwithadvancedgastriccanceraftertreatmentwithpemetrexedandoxaliplatinimplicationsforresponseassessmentwithrecistcriteria AT marinigiovanni osteoblasticflareinapatientwithadvancedgastriccanceraftertreatmentwithpemetrexedandoxaliplatinimplicationsforresponseassessmentwithrecistcriteria |