Cargando…

Microbial larvicides for malaria control in The Gambia

BACKGROUND: Mosquito larval control may prove to be an effective tool for incorporating into integrated vector management (IVM) strategies for reducing malaria transmission. Here the efficacy of microbial larvicides against Anopheles gambiae s.l. was tested in preparation for a large-scale larvicidi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Majambere, Silas, Lindsay, Steven W, Green, Clare, Kandeh, Balla, Fillinger, Ulrike
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1899511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17555570
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-6-76
_version_ 1782133947356938240
author Majambere, Silas
Lindsay, Steven W
Green, Clare
Kandeh, Balla
Fillinger, Ulrike
author_facet Majambere, Silas
Lindsay, Steven W
Green, Clare
Kandeh, Balla
Fillinger, Ulrike
author_sort Majambere, Silas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mosquito larval control may prove to be an effective tool for incorporating into integrated vector management (IVM) strategies for reducing malaria transmission. Here the efficacy of microbial larvicides against Anopheles gambiae s.l. was tested in preparation for a large-scale larviciding programme in The Gambia. METHODS: The impact of water-dispersible (WDG) and corn granule (CG) formulations of commercial Bacillus sphaericus strain 2362 (Bs; VectoLex(®)) and Bacillus thuringiensis var.israelensis strain AM65-52 (Bti; VectoBac(®)) on larval development were tested under laboratory and field conditions to (1) identify the susceptibility of local vectors, (2) evaluate the residual effect and re-treatment intervals, (3) test the effectiveness of the microbials under operational application conditions and (4) develop a method for large-scale application. RESULTS: The major malaria vectors were highly susceptible to both microbials. The lethal concentration (LC) to kill 95% of third instar larvae of Anopheles gambiae s.s. after 24 hours was 0.023 mg/l (14.9 BsITU/l) for Bs WDG and 0.132 mg/l (396 ITU/l) for Bti WDG. In general Bs had little residual effect under field conditions even when the application rate was 200 times greater than the LC(95). However, there was a residual effect up to 10 days in standardized field tests implemented during the dry season. Both microbials achieved 100% mortality of larvae 24–48 hours post-application but late instar larvae were detected 4 days after treatment. Pupae development was reduced by 94% (95% Confidence Interval = 90.8–97.5%) at weekly re-treatment intervals. Field tests showed that Bs had no residual activity against anopheline larvae. Both microbials provided complete protection when applied weekly. The basic training of personnel in identification of habitats, calibration of application equipment and active larviciding proved to be successful and achieved full coverage and control of mosquito larvae for three months under fully operational conditions. CONCLUSION: Environmentally safe microbial larvicides can significantly reduce larval abundance in the natural habitats of The Gambia and could be a useful tool for inclusion in an IVM programme. The costs of the intervention in this setting could be reduced with formulations that provide a greater residual effect.
format Text
id pubmed-1899511
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-18995112007-06-27 Microbial larvicides for malaria control in The Gambia Majambere, Silas Lindsay, Steven W Green, Clare Kandeh, Balla Fillinger, Ulrike Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Mosquito larval control may prove to be an effective tool for incorporating into integrated vector management (IVM) strategies for reducing malaria transmission. Here the efficacy of microbial larvicides against Anopheles gambiae s.l. was tested in preparation for a large-scale larviciding programme in The Gambia. METHODS: The impact of water-dispersible (WDG) and corn granule (CG) formulations of commercial Bacillus sphaericus strain 2362 (Bs; VectoLex(®)) and Bacillus thuringiensis var.israelensis strain AM65-52 (Bti; VectoBac(®)) on larval development were tested under laboratory and field conditions to (1) identify the susceptibility of local vectors, (2) evaluate the residual effect and re-treatment intervals, (3) test the effectiveness of the microbials under operational application conditions and (4) develop a method for large-scale application. RESULTS: The major malaria vectors were highly susceptible to both microbials. The lethal concentration (LC) to kill 95% of third instar larvae of Anopheles gambiae s.s. after 24 hours was 0.023 mg/l (14.9 BsITU/l) for Bs WDG and 0.132 mg/l (396 ITU/l) for Bti WDG. In general Bs had little residual effect under field conditions even when the application rate was 200 times greater than the LC(95). However, there was a residual effect up to 10 days in standardized field tests implemented during the dry season. Both microbials achieved 100% mortality of larvae 24–48 hours post-application but late instar larvae were detected 4 days after treatment. Pupae development was reduced by 94% (95% Confidence Interval = 90.8–97.5%) at weekly re-treatment intervals. Field tests showed that Bs had no residual activity against anopheline larvae. Both microbials provided complete protection when applied weekly. The basic training of personnel in identification of habitats, calibration of application equipment and active larviciding proved to be successful and achieved full coverage and control of mosquito larvae for three months under fully operational conditions. CONCLUSION: Environmentally safe microbial larvicides can significantly reduce larval abundance in the natural habitats of The Gambia and could be a useful tool for inclusion in an IVM programme. The costs of the intervention in this setting could be reduced with formulations that provide a greater residual effect. BioMed Central 2007-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC1899511/ /pubmed/17555570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-6-76 Text en Copyright © 2007 Majambere et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Majambere, Silas
Lindsay, Steven W
Green, Clare
Kandeh, Balla
Fillinger, Ulrike
Microbial larvicides for malaria control in The Gambia
title Microbial larvicides for malaria control in The Gambia
title_full Microbial larvicides for malaria control in The Gambia
title_fullStr Microbial larvicides for malaria control in The Gambia
title_full_unstemmed Microbial larvicides for malaria control in The Gambia
title_short Microbial larvicides for malaria control in The Gambia
title_sort microbial larvicides for malaria control in the gambia
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1899511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17555570
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-6-76
work_keys_str_mv AT majamberesilas microbiallarvicidesformalariacontrolinthegambia
AT lindsaystevenw microbiallarvicidesformalariacontrolinthegambia
AT greenclare microbiallarvicidesformalariacontrolinthegambia
AT kandehballa microbiallarvicidesformalariacontrolinthegambia
AT fillingerulrike microbiallarvicidesformalariacontrolinthegambia