Cargando…
Balancing intellectual monopoly privileges and the need for essential medicines
This issue of Globalization and Health presents a paper by Kerry and Lee that considers the TRIPS agreement and the recent policy debate regarding the protection of public health interest, particularly as they pertain to the Doha Declaration. In this editorial, we consider the debate, the conclusion...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1904211/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17565684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-8603-3-4 |
_version_ | 1782133971533955072 |
---|---|
author | Martin, Greg Sorenson, Corinna Faunce, Thomas |
author_facet | Martin, Greg Sorenson, Corinna Faunce, Thomas |
author_sort | Martin, Greg |
collection | PubMed |
description | This issue of Globalization and Health presents a paper by Kerry and Lee that considers the TRIPS agreement and the recent policy debate regarding the protection of public health interest, particularly as they pertain to the Doha Declaration. In this editorial, we consider the debate, the conclusions thereof, and identify five questions that should be considered by key stakeholders in ongoing discussions. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1904211 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-19042112007-06-29 Balancing intellectual monopoly privileges and the need for essential medicines Martin, Greg Sorenson, Corinna Faunce, Thomas Global Health Editorial This issue of Globalization and Health presents a paper by Kerry and Lee that considers the TRIPS agreement and the recent policy debate regarding the protection of public health interest, particularly as they pertain to the Doha Declaration. In this editorial, we consider the debate, the conclusions thereof, and identify five questions that should be considered by key stakeholders in ongoing discussions. BioMed Central 2007-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC1904211/ /pubmed/17565684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-8603-3-4 Text en Copyright © 2007 Martin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Editorial Martin, Greg Sorenson, Corinna Faunce, Thomas Balancing intellectual monopoly privileges and the need for essential medicines |
title | Balancing intellectual monopoly privileges and the need for essential medicines |
title_full | Balancing intellectual monopoly privileges and the need for essential medicines |
title_fullStr | Balancing intellectual monopoly privileges and the need for essential medicines |
title_full_unstemmed | Balancing intellectual monopoly privileges and the need for essential medicines |
title_short | Balancing intellectual monopoly privileges and the need for essential medicines |
title_sort | balancing intellectual monopoly privileges and the need for essential medicines |
topic | Editorial |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1904211/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17565684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-8603-3-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT martingreg balancingintellectualmonopolyprivilegesandtheneedforessentialmedicines AT sorensoncorinna balancingintellectualmonopolyprivilegesandtheneedforessentialmedicines AT fauncethomas balancingintellectualmonopolyprivilegesandtheneedforessentialmedicines |