Cargando…
Exploring the role of organizational policies and procedures in promoting research utilization in registered nurses
BACKGROUND: Policies and procedures (P&Ps) have been suggested as one possible strategy for moving research evidence into practice among nursing staff in hospitals. Research in the area of P&Ps is limited, however. This paper explores: 1) nurses' use of eight specific research-based pra...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1904235/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17550597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-2-17 |
_version_ | 1782133977198362624 |
---|---|
author | Squires, Janet E Moralejo, Donna LeFort, Sandra M |
author_facet | Squires, Janet E Moralejo, Donna LeFort, Sandra M |
author_sort | Squires, Janet E |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Policies and procedures (P&Ps) have been suggested as one possible strategy for moving research evidence into practice among nursing staff in hospitals. Research in the area of P&Ps is limited, however. This paper explores: 1) nurses' use of eight specific research-based practices (RBPs) and RBP overall, 2) nurses' use and understanding of P&Ps, and 3) the role of P&Ps in promoting research utilization. METHODS: Staff nurses from the eight health regions governing acute care services across the Canadian province of Newfoundland and Labrador completed an anonymous questionnaire regarding their use of eight RBPs and associated P&Ps. Data were also obtained from authorities in six of the eight regions about existing relevant P&Ps. We used descriptive statistics and multivariate regression analysis to assess the relationship between key independent variables and self-reported use of RBP. RESULTS: Use of the eight RBPs ranged from 7.8% to 88.6%, depending on the practice. Nurses ranked P&P manuals as their number one source of practice knowledge. Most respondents (84.8%) reported that the main reason they consult the P&P manual is to confirm they are practicing according to agency rules. Multivariate regression analysis identified three significant predictors of being a user versus non-user of RBP overall: awareness, awareness by regular use, and persuasion. Six significant predictors of being a consistent versus less consistent user of RBP overall were also identified: perception of P&P existence, unit, nursing experience, personal experience as a source of practice knowledge, number of existing research-based P&Ps, and lack of time as a barrier to consulting P&P manuals. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that nurses use P&Ps to guide their practice. However, the mere existence of P&Ps is not sufficient to translate research into nursing practice. Individual and organizational factors related to nurses' understanding and use of P&Ps also play key roles. Thus, moving research evidence into practice will require careful interplay between the organization and the individual. P&Ps may be the interface through which this occurs. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1904235 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-19042352007-06-29 Exploring the role of organizational policies and procedures in promoting research utilization in registered nurses Squires, Janet E Moralejo, Donna LeFort, Sandra M Implement Sci Research Article BACKGROUND: Policies and procedures (P&Ps) have been suggested as one possible strategy for moving research evidence into practice among nursing staff in hospitals. Research in the area of P&Ps is limited, however. This paper explores: 1) nurses' use of eight specific research-based practices (RBPs) and RBP overall, 2) nurses' use and understanding of P&Ps, and 3) the role of P&Ps in promoting research utilization. METHODS: Staff nurses from the eight health regions governing acute care services across the Canadian province of Newfoundland and Labrador completed an anonymous questionnaire regarding their use of eight RBPs and associated P&Ps. Data were also obtained from authorities in six of the eight regions about existing relevant P&Ps. We used descriptive statistics and multivariate regression analysis to assess the relationship between key independent variables and self-reported use of RBP. RESULTS: Use of the eight RBPs ranged from 7.8% to 88.6%, depending on the practice. Nurses ranked P&P manuals as their number one source of practice knowledge. Most respondents (84.8%) reported that the main reason they consult the P&P manual is to confirm they are practicing according to agency rules. Multivariate regression analysis identified three significant predictors of being a user versus non-user of RBP overall: awareness, awareness by regular use, and persuasion. Six significant predictors of being a consistent versus less consistent user of RBP overall were also identified: perception of P&P existence, unit, nursing experience, personal experience as a source of practice knowledge, number of existing research-based P&Ps, and lack of time as a barrier to consulting P&P manuals. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that nurses use P&Ps to guide their practice. However, the mere existence of P&Ps is not sufficient to translate research into nursing practice. Individual and organizational factors related to nurses' understanding and use of P&Ps also play key roles. Thus, moving research evidence into practice will require careful interplay between the organization and the individual. P&Ps may be the interface through which this occurs. BioMed Central 2007-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC1904235/ /pubmed/17550597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-2-17 Text en Copyright © 2007 Squires et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Squires, Janet E Moralejo, Donna LeFort, Sandra M Exploring the role of organizational policies and procedures in promoting research utilization in registered nurses |
title | Exploring the role of organizational policies and procedures in promoting research utilization in registered nurses |
title_full | Exploring the role of organizational policies and procedures in promoting research utilization in registered nurses |
title_fullStr | Exploring the role of organizational policies and procedures in promoting research utilization in registered nurses |
title_full_unstemmed | Exploring the role of organizational policies and procedures in promoting research utilization in registered nurses |
title_short | Exploring the role of organizational policies and procedures in promoting research utilization in registered nurses |
title_sort | exploring the role of organizational policies and procedures in promoting research utilization in registered nurses |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1904235/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17550597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-2-17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT squiresjanete exploringtheroleoforganizationalpoliciesandproceduresinpromotingresearchutilizationinregisterednurses AT moralejodonna exploringtheroleoforganizationalpoliciesandproceduresinpromotingresearchutilizationinregisterednurses AT lefortsandram exploringtheroleoforganizationalpoliciesandproceduresinpromotingresearchutilizationinregisterednurses |