Cargando…

Exploring the role of organizational policies and procedures in promoting research utilization in registered nurses

BACKGROUND: Policies and procedures (P&Ps) have been suggested as one possible strategy for moving research evidence into practice among nursing staff in hospitals. Research in the area of P&Ps is limited, however. This paper explores: 1) nurses' use of eight specific research-based pra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Squires, Janet E, Moralejo, Donna, LeFort, Sandra M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1904235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17550597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-2-17
_version_ 1782133977198362624
author Squires, Janet E
Moralejo, Donna
LeFort, Sandra M
author_facet Squires, Janet E
Moralejo, Donna
LeFort, Sandra M
author_sort Squires, Janet E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Policies and procedures (P&Ps) have been suggested as one possible strategy for moving research evidence into practice among nursing staff in hospitals. Research in the area of P&Ps is limited, however. This paper explores: 1) nurses' use of eight specific research-based practices (RBPs) and RBP overall, 2) nurses' use and understanding of P&Ps, and 3) the role of P&Ps in promoting research utilization. METHODS: Staff nurses from the eight health regions governing acute care services across the Canadian province of Newfoundland and Labrador completed an anonymous questionnaire regarding their use of eight RBPs and associated P&Ps. Data were also obtained from authorities in six of the eight regions about existing relevant P&Ps. We used descriptive statistics and multivariate regression analysis to assess the relationship between key independent variables and self-reported use of RBP. RESULTS: Use of the eight RBPs ranged from 7.8% to 88.6%, depending on the practice. Nurses ranked P&P manuals as their number one source of practice knowledge. Most respondents (84.8%) reported that the main reason they consult the P&P manual is to confirm they are practicing according to agency rules. Multivariate regression analysis identified three significant predictors of being a user versus non-user of RBP overall: awareness, awareness by regular use, and persuasion. Six significant predictors of being a consistent versus less consistent user of RBP overall were also identified: perception of P&P existence, unit, nursing experience, personal experience as a source of practice knowledge, number of existing research-based P&Ps, and lack of time as a barrier to consulting P&P manuals. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that nurses use P&Ps to guide their practice. However, the mere existence of P&Ps is not sufficient to translate research into nursing practice. Individual and organizational factors related to nurses' understanding and use of P&Ps also play key roles. Thus, moving research evidence into practice will require careful interplay between the organization and the individual. P&Ps may be the interface through which this occurs.
format Text
id pubmed-1904235
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-19042352007-06-29 Exploring the role of organizational policies and procedures in promoting research utilization in registered nurses Squires, Janet E Moralejo, Donna LeFort, Sandra M Implement Sci Research Article BACKGROUND: Policies and procedures (P&Ps) have been suggested as one possible strategy for moving research evidence into practice among nursing staff in hospitals. Research in the area of P&Ps is limited, however. This paper explores: 1) nurses' use of eight specific research-based practices (RBPs) and RBP overall, 2) nurses' use and understanding of P&Ps, and 3) the role of P&Ps in promoting research utilization. METHODS: Staff nurses from the eight health regions governing acute care services across the Canadian province of Newfoundland and Labrador completed an anonymous questionnaire regarding their use of eight RBPs and associated P&Ps. Data were also obtained from authorities in six of the eight regions about existing relevant P&Ps. We used descriptive statistics and multivariate regression analysis to assess the relationship between key independent variables and self-reported use of RBP. RESULTS: Use of the eight RBPs ranged from 7.8% to 88.6%, depending on the practice. Nurses ranked P&P manuals as their number one source of practice knowledge. Most respondents (84.8%) reported that the main reason they consult the P&P manual is to confirm they are practicing according to agency rules. Multivariate regression analysis identified three significant predictors of being a user versus non-user of RBP overall: awareness, awareness by regular use, and persuasion. Six significant predictors of being a consistent versus less consistent user of RBP overall were also identified: perception of P&P existence, unit, nursing experience, personal experience as a source of practice knowledge, number of existing research-based P&Ps, and lack of time as a barrier to consulting P&P manuals. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that nurses use P&Ps to guide their practice. However, the mere existence of P&Ps is not sufficient to translate research into nursing practice. Individual and organizational factors related to nurses' understanding and use of P&Ps also play key roles. Thus, moving research evidence into practice will require careful interplay between the organization and the individual. P&Ps may be the interface through which this occurs. BioMed Central 2007-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC1904235/ /pubmed/17550597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-2-17 Text en Copyright © 2007 Squires et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Squires, Janet E
Moralejo, Donna
LeFort, Sandra M
Exploring the role of organizational policies and procedures in promoting research utilization in registered nurses
title Exploring the role of organizational policies and procedures in promoting research utilization in registered nurses
title_full Exploring the role of organizational policies and procedures in promoting research utilization in registered nurses
title_fullStr Exploring the role of organizational policies and procedures in promoting research utilization in registered nurses
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the role of organizational policies and procedures in promoting research utilization in registered nurses
title_short Exploring the role of organizational policies and procedures in promoting research utilization in registered nurses
title_sort exploring the role of organizational policies and procedures in promoting research utilization in registered nurses
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1904235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17550597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-2-17
work_keys_str_mv AT squiresjanete exploringtheroleoforganizationalpoliciesandproceduresinpromotingresearchutilizationinregisterednurses
AT moralejodonna exploringtheroleoforganizationalpoliciesandproceduresinpromotingresearchutilizationinregisterednurses
AT lefortsandram exploringtheroleoforganizationalpoliciesandproceduresinpromotingresearchutilizationinregisterednurses