Cargando…

Promoting childbirth companions in South Africa: a randomised pilot study

BACKGROUND: Most women delivering in South African State Maternity Hospitals do not have a childbirth companion; in addition, the quality of care could be better, and at times women are treated inhumanely. We piloted a multi-faceted intervention to encourage uptake of childbirth companions in state...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brown, Heather, Hofmeyr, G Justus, Nikodem, V Cheryl, Smith, Helen, Garner, Paul
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1905915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17470267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-5-7
_version_ 1782134009429491712
author Brown, Heather
Hofmeyr, G Justus
Nikodem, V Cheryl
Smith, Helen
Garner, Paul
author_facet Brown, Heather
Hofmeyr, G Justus
Nikodem, V Cheryl
Smith, Helen
Garner, Paul
author_sort Brown, Heather
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Most women delivering in South African State Maternity Hospitals do not have a childbirth companion; in addition, the quality of care could be better, and at times women are treated inhumanely. We piloted a multi-faceted intervention to encourage uptake of childbirth companions in state hospitals, and hypothesised that lay carers would improve the behaviour of health professionals. METHODS: We conducted a pilot randomised controlled trial of an intervention to promote childbirth companions in hospital deliveries. We promoted evidence-based information for maternity staff at 10 hospitals through access to the World Health Organization Reproductive Health Library (RHL), computer hardware and training to all ten hospitals. We surveyed 200 women at each site, measuring companionship, and indicators of good obstetric practice and humanity of care. Five hospitals were then randomly allocated to receive an educational intervention to promote childbirth companions, and we surveyed all hospitals again at eight months through a repeat survey of postnatal women. Changes in median values between intervention and control hospitals were examined. RESULTS: At baseline, the majority of hospitals did not allow a companion, or access to food or fluids. A third of women were given an episiotomy. Some women were shouted at (17.7%, N = 2085), and a few reported being slapped or struck (4.3%, N = 2080). Despite an initial positive response from staff to the childbirth companion intervention, we detected no difference between intervention and control hospitals in relation to whether a companion was allowed by nursing staff, good obstetric practice or humanity of care. CONCLUSION: The quality and humanity of care in these state hospitals needs to improve. Introducing childbirth companions was more difficult than we anticipated, particularly in under-resourced health care systems with frequent staff changes. We were unable to determine whether the presence of a lay carer impacted on the humanity of care provided by health professionals. Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN33728802
format Text
id pubmed-1905915
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-19059152007-07-03 Promoting childbirth companions in South Africa: a randomised pilot study Brown, Heather Hofmeyr, G Justus Nikodem, V Cheryl Smith, Helen Garner, Paul BMC Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Most women delivering in South African State Maternity Hospitals do not have a childbirth companion; in addition, the quality of care could be better, and at times women are treated inhumanely. We piloted a multi-faceted intervention to encourage uptake of childbirth companions in state hospitals, and hypothesised that lay carers would improve the behaviour of health professionals. METHODS: We conducted a pilot randomised controlled trial of an intervention to promote childbirth companions in hospital deliveries. We promoted evidence-based information for maternity staff at 10 hospitals through access to the World Health Organization Reproductive Health Library (RHL), computer hardware and training to all ten hospitals. We surveyed 200 women at each site, measuring companionship, and indicators of good obstetric practice and humanity of care. Five hospitals were then randomly allocated to receive an educational intervention to promote childbirth companions, and we surveyed all hospitals again at eight months through a repeat survey of postnatal women. Changes in median values between intervention and control hospitals were examined. RESULTS: At baseline, the majority of hospitals did not allow a companion, or access to food or fluids. A third of women were given an episiotomy. Some women were shouted at (17.7%, N = 2085), and a few reported being slapped or struck (4.3%, N = 2080). Despite an initial positive response from staff to the childbirth companion intervention, we detected no difference between intervention and control hospitals in relation to whether a companion was allowed by nursing staff, good obstetric practice or humanity of care. CONCLUSION: The quality and humanity of care in these state hospitals needs to improve. Introducing childbirth companions was more difficult than we anticipated, particularly in under-resourced health care systems with frequent staff changes. We were unable to determine whether the presence of a lay carer impacted on the humanity of care provided by health professionals. Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN33728802 BioMed Central 2007-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC1905915/ /pubmed/17470267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-5-7 Text en Copyright © 2007 Brown et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Brown, Heather
Hofmeyr, G Justus
Nikodem, V Cheryl
Smith, Helen
Garner, Paul
Promoting childbirth companions in South Africa: a randomised pilot study
title Promoting childbirth companions in South Africa: a randomised pilot study
title_full Promoting childbirth companions in South Africa: a randomised pilot study
title_fullStr Promoting childbirth companions in South Africa: a randomised pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Promoting childbirth companions in South Africa: a randomised pilot study
title_short Promoting childbirth companions in South Africa: a randomised pilot study
title_sort promoting childbirth companions in south africa: a randomised pilot study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1905915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17470267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-5-7
work_keys_str_mv AT brownheather promotingchildbirthcompanionsinsouthafricaarandomisedpilotstudy
AT hofmeyrgjustus promotingchildbirthcompanionsinsouthafricaarandomisedpilotstudy
AT nikodemvcheryl promotingchildbirthcompanionsinsouthafricaarandomisedpilotstudy
AT smithhelen promotingchildbirthcompanionsinsouthafricaarandomisedpilotstudy
AT garnerpaul promotingchildbirthcompanionsinsouthafricaarandomisedpilotstudy