Cargando…
Promoting childbirth companions in South Africa: a randomised pilot study
BACKGROUND: Most women delivering in South African State Maternity Hospitals do not have a childbirth companion; in addition, the quality of care could be better, and at times women are treated inhumanely. We piloted a multi-faceted intervention to encourage uptake of childbirth companions in state...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1905915/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17470267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-5-7 |
_version_ | 1782134009429491712 |
---|---|
author | Brown, Heather Hofmeyr, G Justus Nikodem, V Cheryl Smith, Helen Garner, Paul |
author_facet | Brown, Heather Hofmeyr, G Justus Nikodem, V Cheryl Smith, Helen Garner, Paul |
author_sort | Brown, Heather |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Most women delivering in South African State Maternity Hospitals do not have a childbirth companion; in addition, the quality of care could be better, and at times women are treated inhumanely. We piloted a multi-faceted intervention to encourage uptake of childbirth companions in state hospitals, and hypothesised that lay carers would improve the behaviour of health professionals. METHODS: We conducted a pilot randomised controlled trial of an intervention to promote childbirth companions in hospital deliveries. We promoted evidence-based information for maternity staff at 10 hospitals through access to the World Health Organization Reproductive Health Library (RHL), computer hardware and training to all ten hospitals. We surveyed 200 women at each site, measuring companionship, and indicators of good obstetric practice and humanity of care. Five hospitals were then randomly allocated to receive an educational intervention to promote childbirth companions, and we surveyed all hospitals again at eight months through a repeat survey of postnatal women. Changes in median values between intervention and control hospitals were examined. RESULTS: At baseline, the majority of hospitals did not allow a companion, or access to food or fluids. A third of women were given an episiotomy. Some women were shouted at (17.7%, N = 2085), and a few reported being slapped or struck (4.3%, N = 2080). Despite an initial positive response from staff to the childbirth companion intervention, we detected no difference between intervention and control hospitals in relation to whether a companion was allowed by nursing staff, good obstetric practice or humanity of care. CONCLUSION: The quality and humanity of care in these state hospitals needs to improve. Introducing childbirth companions was more difficult than we anticipated, particularly in under-resourced health care systems with frequent staff changes. We were unable to determine whether the presence of a lay carer impacted on the humanity of care provided by health professionals. Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN33728802 |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1905915 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-19059152007-07-03 Promoting childbirth companions in South Africa: a randomised pilot study Brown, Heather Hofmeyr, G Justus Nikodem, V Cheryl Smith, Helen Garner, Paul BMC Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Most women delivering in South African State Maternity Hospitals do not have a childbirth companion; in addition, the quality of care could be better, and at times women are treated inhumanely. We piloted a multi-faceted intervention to encourage uptake of childbirth companions in state hospitals, and hypothesised that lay carers would improve the behaviour of health professionals. METHODS: We conducted a pilot randomised controlled trial of an intervention to promote childbirth companions in hospital deliveries. We promoted evidence-based information for maternity staff at 10 hospitals through access to the World Health Organization Reproductive Health Library (RHL), computer hardware and training to all ten hospitals. We surveyed 200 women at each site, measuring companionship, and indicators of good obstetric practice and humanity of care. Five hospitals were then randomly allocated to receive an educational intervention to promote childbirth companions, and we surveyed all hospitals again at eight months through a repeat survey of postnatal women. Changes in median values between intervention and control hospitals were examined. RESULTS: At baseline, the majority of hospitals did not allow a companion, or access to food or fluids. A third of women were given an episiotomy. Some women were shouted at (17.7%, N = 2085), and a few reported being slapped or struck (4.3%, N = 2080). Despite an initial positive response from staff to the childbirth companion intervention, we detected no difference between intervention and control hospitals in relation to whether a companion was allowed by nursing staff, good obstetric practice or humanity of care. CONCLUSION: The quality and humanity of care in these state hospitals needs to improve. Introducing childbirth companions was more difficult than we anticipated, particularly in under-resourced health care systems with frequent staff changes. We were unable to determine whether the presence of a lay carer impacted on the humanity of care provided by health professionals. Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN33728802 BioMed Central 2007-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC1905915/ /pubmed/17470267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-5-7 Text en Copyright © 2007 Brown et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Brown, Heather Hofmeyr, G Justus Nikodem, V Cheryl Smith, Helen Garner, Paul Promoting childbirth companions in South Africa: a randomised pilot study |
title | Promoting childbirth companions in South Africa: a randomised pilot study |
title_full | Promoting childbirth companions in South Africa: a randomised pilot study |
title_fullStr | Promoting childbirth companions in South Africa: a randomised pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed | Promoting childbirth companions in South Africa: a randomised pilot study |
title_short | Promoting childbirth companions in South Africa: a randomised pilot study |
title_sort | promoting childbirth companions in south africa: a randomised pilot study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1905915/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17470267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-5-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brownheather promotingchildbirthcompanionsinsouthafricaarandomisedpilotstudy AT hofmeyrgjustus promotingchildbirthcompanionsinsouthafricaarandomisedpilotstudy AT nikodemvcheryl promotingchildbirthcompanionsinsouthafricaarandomisedpilotstudy AT smithhelen promotingchildbirthcompanionsinsouthafricaarandomisedpilotstudy AT garnerpaul promotingchildbirthcompanionsinsouthafricaarandomisedpilotstudy |