Cargando…

Do anesthetics and sampling strategies affect transcription analysis of fish tissues?

BACKGROUND: The aim of the current examination was to evaluate if sedation and anesthetic treatment techniques affect the quality of RNA extracted from liver, gill, head kidney and brain tissues in Atlantic salmon Salmo salar L. Blood parameters were measured and tissue specimens sampled in six grou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olsvik, Pål A, Lie, Kai K, Hevrøy, Ernst M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1905918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17559653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2199-8-48
_version_ 1782134010146717696
author Olsvik, Pål A
Lie, Kai K
Hevrøy, Ernst M
author_facet Olsvik, Pål A
Lie, Kai K
Hevrøy, Ernst M
author_sort Olsvik, Pål A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of the current examination was to evaluate if sedation and anesthetic treatment techniques affect the quality of RNA extracted from liver, gill, head kidney and brain tissues in Atlantic salmon Salmo salar L. Blood parameters were measured and tissue specimens sampled in six groups of fish; one control group (0 minutes), two groups kept in pure seawater in 90 liter tanks for 30 and 120 minutes, two groups treated with the anesthetic isoeugenol for 30 and 120 minutes, and one group kept in pure seawater for 105 minutes and then anaesthetized with metacaine for 15 minutes. RNA quality was assessed with the NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (260/280 and 260/230 nm ratios) and with the Agilent Bioanalyzer (28S/18S ratio and RIN data) in samples either preserved in liquefied nitrogen (N(2)) or in RNAlater. In addition, the transcriptional levels of two fast-responding genes were quantified in gill and brain tissues. RESULTS: The results show that physiological stress during sampling does not affect the quality of RNA extracted from fish specimens. However, prolonged sedation (2 hours) resulted in a metabolic alkalosis that again affected the transcriptional levels of genes involved in ionoregulation and respiration. In gills, Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase α1b was significantly downregulated and hypoxia inducible factor 1 (HIF1) significantly upregulated after two hours of treatment with isoeugenol, suggesting that this commonly used sedative affects osmo-regulation and respiration in the fish. The results also suggest that for tissue preservation in general it is better to flash-freeze fish specimens in liquefied N(2 )than to use RNAlater. CONCLUSION: Prolonged sedation may affect the transcription of fast-responding genes in tissues of fish. Two hours of sedation with isoeugenol resulted in downregulation of the Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase α1b gene and upregulation of the HIF1 gene in gills of Atlantic salmon. The quality of RNA extracted from tissue specimens, however, was not affected by sedation treatment. Flash-freezing of tissue specimens seems to be the preferred preservation technique, when sampling fish tissue specimens for RNA extraction.
format Text
id pubmed-1905918
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-19059182007-07-03 Do anesthetics and sampling strategies affect transcription analysis of fish tissues? Olsvik, Pål A Lie, Kai K Hevrøy, Ernst M BMC Mol Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of the current examination was to evaluate if sedation and anesthetic treatment techniques affect the quality of RNA extracted from liver, gill, head kidney and brain tissues in Atlantic salmon Salmo salar L. Blood parameters were measured and tissue specimens sampled in six groups of fish; one control group (0 minutes), two groups kept in pure seawater in 90 liter tanks for 30 and 120 minutes, two groups treated with the anesthetic isoeugenol for 30 and 120 minutes, and one group kept in pure seawater for 105 minutes and then anaesthetized with metacaine for 15 minutes. RNA quality was assessed with the NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (260/280 and 260/230 nm ratios) and with the Agilent Bioanalyzer (28S/18S ratio and RIN data) in samples either preserved in liquefied nitrogen (N(2)) or in RNAlater. In addition, the transcriptional levels of two fast-responding genes were quantified in gill and brain tissues. RESULTS: The results show that physiological stress during sampling does not affect the quality of RNA extracted from fish specimens. However, prolonged sedation (2 hours) resulted in a metabolic alkalosis that again affected the transcriptional levels of genes involved in ionoregulation and respiration. In gills, Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase α1b was significantly downregulated and hypoxia inducible factor 1 (HIF1) significantly upregulated after two hours of treatment with isoeugenol, suggesting that this commonly used sedative affects osmo-regulation and respiration in the fish. The results also suggest that for tissue preservation in general it is better to flash-freeze fish specimens in liquefied N(2 )than to use RNAlater. CONCLUSION: Prolonged sedation may affect the transcription of fast-responding genes in tissues of fish. Two hours of sedation with isoeugenol resulted in downregulation of the Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase α1b gene and upregulation of the HIF1 gene in gills of Atlantic salmon. The quality of RNA extracted from tissue specimens, however, was not affected by sedation treatment. Flash-freezing of tissue specimens seems to be the preferred preservation technique, when sampling fish tissue specimens for RNA extraction. BioMed Central 2007-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC1905918/ /pubmed/17559653 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2199-8-48 Text en Copyright © 2007 Olsvik et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Olsvik, Pål A
Lie, Kai K
Hevrøy, Ernst M
Do anesthetics and sampling strategies affect transcription analysis of fish tissues?
title Do anesthetics and sampling strategies affect transcription analysis of fish tissues?
title_full Do anesthetics and sampling strategies affect transcription analysis of fish tissues?
title_fullStr Do anesthetics and sampling strategies affect transcription analysis of fish tissues?
title_full_unstemmed Do anesthetics and sampling strategies affect transcription analysis of fish tissues?
title_short Do anesthetics and sampling strategies affect transcription analysis of fish tissues?
title_sort do anesthetics and sampling strategies affect transcription analysis of fish tissues?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1905918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17559653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2199-8-48
work_keys_str_mv AT olsvikpala doanestheticsandsamplingstrategiesaffecttranscriptionanalysisoffishtissues
AT liekaik doanestheticsandsamplingstrategiesaffecttranscriptionanalysisoffishtissues
AT hevrøyernstm doanestheticsandsamplingstrategiesaffecttranscriptionanalysisoffishtissues