Cargando…

Involving deprived communities in improving the quality of primary care services: does participatory action research work?

BACKGROUND: Participation by communities in improving the quality of health services has become a feature of government policy in the United Kingdom. The aim of the study was to involve a deprived community in the UK in shaping quality improvements of local primary care services. The specific object...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cawston, Peter G, Mercer, Stewart W, Barbour, Rosaline S
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1906765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17572913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-7-88
_version_ 1782134022002966528
author Cawston, Peter G
Mercer, Stewart W
Barbour, Rosaline S
author_facet Cawston, Peter G
Mercer, Stewart W
Barbour, Rosaline S
author_sort Cawston, Peter G
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Participation by communities in improving the quality of health services has become a feature of government policy in the United Kingdom. The aim of the study was to involve a deprived community in the UK in shaping quality improvements of local primary care services. The specific objectives were firstly to create participation by local people in evaluating the primary care services available in the area and secondly to bring about change as a result of this process. METHODS: The methods of participatory action research was used. The study was set in an area of high socio-economic deprivation served by a 'Local Health Care Co-operative' in a peripheral housing estate in Glasgow, Scotland. 72 local residents took part in 11 focus groups: eight of these were with community groups and three with other residents. 372 local residents completed questionnaires either by brief face-to-face interviews (114) or by self or carer completion (258). RESULTS: The study group produced recommendations on physical access to the health centre, time constraints in accessing services and problems encountered in individual relationships with health staff. They also highlighted the social gap between health service providers and the daily life of community residents. Action was taken to bring these recommendations to the attention of the Primary Care Organisation. CONCLUSION: Participatory action research was used to involve a deprived community in the UK in a 'bottom-up' approach aimed at improving quality of local primary care services. Although successful in creating a partnership between academic researchers and lay researchers and participation by local people in evaluating the primary care services available in the area, the impact of the study in terms of immediate action taken over specific issues has been modest. The possible reasons for this are discussed.
format Text
id pubmed-1906765
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-19067652007-07-04 Involving deprived communities in improving the quality of primary care services: does participatory action research work? Cawston, Peter G Mercer, Stewart W Barbour, Rosaline S BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Participation by communities in improving the quality of health services has become a feature of government policy in the United Kingdom. The aim of the study was to involve a deprived community in the UK in shaping quality improvements of local primary care services. The specific objectives were firstly to create participation by local people in evaluating the primary care services available in the area and secondly to bring about change as a result of this process. METHODS: The methods of participatory action research was used. The study was set in an area of high socio-economic deprivation served by a 'Local Health Care Co-operative' in a peripheral housing estate in Glasgow, Scotland. 72 local residents took part in 11 focus groups: eight of these were with community groups and three with other residents. 372 local residents completed questionnaires either by brief face-to-face interviews (114) or by self or carer completion (258). RESULTS: The study group produced recommendations on physical access to the health centre, time constraints in accessing services and problems encountered in individual relationships with health staff. They also highlighted the social gap between health service providers and the daily life of community residents. Action was taken to bring these recommendations to the attention of the Primary Care Organisation. CONCLUSION: Participatory action research was used to involve a deprived community in the UK in a 'bottom-up' approach aimed at improving quality of local primary care services. Although successful in creating a partnership between academic researchers and lay researchers and participation by local people in evaluating the primary care services available in the area, the impact of the study in terms of immediate action taken over specific issues has been modest. The possible reasons for this are discussed. BioMed Central 2007-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC1906765/ /pubmed/17572913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-7-88 Text en Copyright © 2007 Cawston et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cawston, Peter G
Mercer, Stewart W
Barbour, Rosaline S
Involving deprived communities in improving the quality of primary care services: does participatory action research work?
title Involving deprived communities in improving the quality of primary care services: does participatory action research work?
title_full Involving deprived communities in improving the quality of primary care services: does participatory action research work?
title_fullStr Involving deprived communities in improving the quality of primary care services: does participatory action research work?
title_full_unstemmed Involving deprived communities in improving the quality of primary care services: does participatory action research work?
title_short Involving deprived communities in improving the quality of primary care services: does participatory action research work?
title_sort involving deprived communities in improving the quality of primary care services: does participatory action research work?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1906765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17572913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-7-88
work_keys_str_mv AT cawstonpeterg involvingdeprivedcommunitiesinimprovingthequalityofprimarycareservicesdoesparticipatoryactionresearchwork
AT mercerstewartw involvingdeprivedcommunitiesinimprovingthequalityofprimarycareservicesdoesparticipatoryactionresearchwork
AT barbourrosalines involvingdeprivedcommunitiesinimprovingthequalityofprimarycareservicesdoesparticipatoryactionresearchwork