Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of tiotropium in COPD patients in primary care – the SPiRiva Usual CarE (SPRUCE) study

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials of tiotropium have principally recruited patients from secondary care with more severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and typically had included limitation of concomitant medication. In primary care, which is the most common setting for COPD management, man...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Freeman, Daryl, Lee, Angela, Price, David
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1913915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17605774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-8-45
_version_ 1782134088615854080
author Freeman, Daryl
Lee, Angela
Price, David
author_facet Freeman, Daryl
Lee, Angela
Price, David
author_sort Freeman, Daryl
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinical trials of tiotropium have principally recruited patients from secondary care with more severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and typically had included limitation of concomitant medication. In primary care, which is the most common setting for COPD management, many patients may have milder disease, and also may take a broad range of concomitant medication. METHODS: This randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 12-week, 44-centre study investigated the efficacy (trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV(1)] response) and safety of additional treatment with once-daily tiotropium 18 μg via the HandiHaler(® )in a primary care COPD population (tiotropium: N = 191, FEV(1 )= 1.25 L [47.91% predicted]; placebo: N = 183, FEV(1 )= 1.32 L [49.86% predicted]). Secondary endpoints included: trough forced vital capacity (FVC) response, weekly use of rescue short-acting β-agonist, and exacerbation of COPD (complex of respiratory symptoms/events of >3 days in duration requiring a change in treatment). Treatment effects were determined using non-parametric analysis. RESULTS: At Week 12, median improvement in trough FEV(1 )response with tiotropium versus placebo was 0.06 L (p = 0.0102). The improvement was consistent across baseline treatment and COPD severity. Median improvement in FVC at 2, 6 and 12 weeks was 0.12 L (p < 0.001). The percentage of patients with ≥1 exacerbation was reduced (tiotropium 9.5%; placebo 17.9%; p = 0.0147), independent of disease severity. Rescue medication usage was significantly reduced in the tiotropium group compared with placebo. Adverse event profile was consistent with previous studies. CONCLUSION: Tiotropium provides additional benefits to usual primary care management in a representative COPD population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The identifier is: NCT00274079.
format Text
id pubmed-1913915
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-19139152007-07-11 Efficacy and safety of tiotropium in COPD patients in primary care – the SPiRiva Usual CarE (SPRUCE) study Freeman, Daryl Lee, Angela Price, David Respir Res Research BACKGROUND: Clinical trials of tiotropium have principally recruited patients from secondary care with more severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and typically had included limitation of concomitant medication. In primary care, which is the most common setting for COPD management, many patients may have milder disease, and also may take a broad range of concomitant medication. METHODS: This randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 12-week, 44-centre study investigated the efficacy (trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV(1)] response) and safety of additional treatment with once-daily tiotropium 18 μg via the HandiHaler(® )in a primary care COPD population (tiotropium: N = 191, FEV(1 )= 1.25 L [47.91% predicted]; placebo: N = 183, FEV(1 )= 1.32 L [49.86% predicted]). Secondary endpoints included: trough forced vital capacity (FVC) response, weekly use of rescue short-acting β-agonist, and exacerbation of COPD (complex of respiratory symptoms/events of >3 days in duration requiring a change in treatment). Treatment effects were determined using non-parametric analysis. RESULTS: At Week 12, median improvement in trough FEV(1 )response with tiotropium versus placebo was 0.06 L (p = 0.0102). The improvement was consistent across baseline treatment and COPD severity. Median improvement in FVC at 2, 6 and 12 weeks was 0.12 L (p < 0.001). The percentage of patients with ≥1 exacerbation was reduced (tiotropium 9.5%; placebo 17.9%; p = 0.0147), independent of disease severity. Rescue medication usage was significantly reduced in the tiotropium group compared with placebo. Adverse event profile was consistent with previous studies. CONCLUSION: Tiotropium provides additional benefits to usual primary care management in a representative COPD population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The identifier is: NCT00274079. BioMed Central 2007 2007-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC1913915/ /pubmed/17605774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-8-45 Text en Copyright © 2007 Freeman et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Freeman, Daryl
Lee, Angela
Price, David
Efficacy and safety of tiotropium in COPD patients in primary care – the SPiRiva Usual CarE (SPRUCE) study
title Efficacy and safety of tiotropium in COPD patients in primary care – the SPiRiva Usual CarE (SPRUCE) study
title_full Efficacy and safety of tiotropium in COPD patients in primary care – the SPiRiva Usual CarE (SPRUCE) study
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of tiotropium in COPD patients in primary care – the SPiRiva Usual CarE (SPRUCE) study
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of tiotropium in COPD patients in primary care – the SPiRiva Usual CarE (SPRUCE) study
title_short Efficacy and safety of tiotropium in COPD patients in primary care – the SPiRiva Usual CarE (SPRUCE) study
title_sort efficacy and safety of tiotropium in copd patients in primary care – the spiriva usual care (spruce) study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1913915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17605774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-8-45
work_keys_str_mv AT freemandaryl efficacyandsafetyoftiotropiumincopdpatientsinprimarycarethespirivausualcaresprucestudy
AT leeangela efficacyandsafetyoftiotropiumincopdpatientsinprimarycarethespirivausualcaresprucestudy
AT pricedavid efficacyandsafetyoftiotropiumincopdpatientsinprimarycarethespirivausualcaresprucestudy