Cargando…
Comparing primary prevention with secondary prevention to explain decreasing Coronary Heart Disease death rates in Ireland, 1985–2000
BACKGROUND: To investigate whether primary prevention might be more favourable than secondary prevention (risk factor reduction in patients with coronary heart disease(CHD)). METHODS: The cell-based IMPACT CHD mortality model was used to integrate data for Ireland describing CHD patient numbers, upt...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1914046/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17584932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-7-117 |
_version_ | 1782134093873414144 |
---|---|
author | Kabir, Zubair Bennett, Kathleen Shelley, Emer Unal, Belgin Critchley, Julia A Capewell, Simon |
author_facet | Kabir, Zubair Bennett, Kathleen Shelley, Emer Unal, Belgin Critchley, Julia A Capewell, Simon |
author_sort | Kabir, Zubair |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To investigate whether primary prevention might be more favourable than secondary prevention (risk factor reduction in patients with coronary heart disease(CHD)). METHODS: The cell-based IMPACT CHD mortality model was used to integrate data for Ireland describing CHD patient numbers, uptake of specific treatments, trends in major cardiovascular risk factors, and the mortality benefits of these specific risk factor changes in CHD patients and in healthy people without recognised CHD. RESULTS: Between 1985 and 2000, approximately 2,530 fewer deaths were attributable to reductions in the three major risk factors in Ireland. Overall smoking prevalence declined by 14% between 1985 and 2000, resulting in about 685 fewer deaths (minimum estimate 330, maximum estimate 1,285) attributable to smoking cessation: about 275 in healthy people and 410 in known CHD patients. Population total cholesterol concentrations fell by 4.6%, resultingin approximately 1,300 (minimum estimate 1,115, maximum estimate 1,660) fewer deaths attributable to dietary changes(1,185 in healthy people and 115 in CHD patients) plus 305 fewer deaths attributable to statin treatment (45 in people without CHD and 260 in CHD patients). Mean population diastolic blood pressure fell by 7.2%, resulting in approximately 170 (minimum estimate 105, maximum estimate 300) fewer deaths attributable to secular falls in blood pressure (140 in healthy people and 30 in CHD patients), plus approximately 70 fewer deaths attributable to antihypertensive treatments in people without CHD. Of all the deaths attributable to risk factor falls, some 1,715 (68%) occurred in people without recognized CHD and 815(32%) in CHD patients. CONCLUSION: Compared with secondary prevention, primary prevention achieved a two-fold larger reduction in CHD deaths. Future national CHD policies should therefore prioritize nationwide interventions to promote healthy diets and reduce smoking. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1914046 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-19140462007-07-13 Comparing primary prevention with secondary prevention to explain decreasing Coronary Heart Disease death rates in Ireland, 1985–2000 Kabir, Zubair Bennett, Kathleen Shelley, Emer Unal, Belgin Critchley, Julia A Capewell, Simon BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: To investigate whether primary prevention might be more favourable than secondary prevention (risk factor reduction in patients with coronary heart disease(CHD)). METHODS: The cell-based IMPACT CHD mortality model was used to integrate data for Ireland describing CHD patient numbers, uptake of specific treatments, trends in major cardiovascular risk factors, and the mortality benefits of these specific risk factor changes in CHD patients and in healthy people without recognised CHD. RESULTS: Between 1985 and 2000, approximately 2,530 fewer deaths were attributable to reductions in the three major risk factors in Ireland. Overall smoking prevalence declined by 14% between 1985 and 2000, resulting in about 685 fewer deaths (minimum estimate 330, maximum estimate 1,285) attributable to smoking cessation: about 275 in healthy people and 410 in known CHD patients. Population total cholesterol concentrations fell by 4.6%, resultingin approximately 1,300 (minimum estimate 1,115, maximum estimate 1,660) fewer deaths attributable to dietary changes(1,185 in healthy people and 115 in CHD patients) plus 305 fewer deaths attributable to statin treatment (45 in people without CHD and 260 in CHD patients). Mean population diastolic blood pressure fell by 7.2%, resulting in approximately 170 (minimum estimate 105, maximum estimate 300) fewer deaths attributable to secular falls in blood pressure (140 in healthy people and 30 in CHD patients), plus approximately 70 fewer deaths attributable to antihypertensive treatments in people without CHD. Of all the deaths attributable to risk factor falls, some 1,715 (68%) occurred in people without recognized CHD and 815(32%) in CHD patients. CONCLUSION: Compared with secondary prevention, primary prevention achieved a two-fold larger reduction in CHD deaths. Future national CHD policies should therefore prioritize nationwide interventions to promote healthy diets and reduce smoking. BioMed Central 2007-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC1914046/ /pubmed/17584932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-7-117 Text en Copyright © 2007 Kabir et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kabir, Zubair Bennett, Kathleen Shelley, Emer Unal, Belgin Critchley, Julia A Capewell, Simon Comparing primary prevention with secondary prevention to explain decreasing Coronary Heart Disease death rates in Ireland, 1985–2000 |
title | Comparing primary prevention with secondary prevention to explain decreasing Coronary Heart Disease death rates in Ireland, 1985–2000 |
title_full | Comparing primary prevention with secondary prevention to explain decreasing Coronary Heart Disease death rates in Ireland, 1985–2000 |
title_fullStr | Comparing primary prevention with secondary prevention to explain decreasing Coronary Heart Disease death rates in Ireland, 1985–2000 |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing primary prevention with secondary prevention to explain decreasing Coronary Heart Disease death rates in Ireland, 1985–2000 |
title_short | Comparing primary prevention with secondary prevention to explain decreasing Coronary Heart Disease death rates in Ireland, 1985–2000 |
title_sort | comparing primary prevention with secondary prevention to explain decreasing coronary heart disease death rates in ireland, 1985–2000 |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1914046/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17584932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-7-117 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kabirzubair comparingprimarypreventionwithsecondarypreventiontoexplaindecreasingcoronaryheartdiseasedeathratesinireland19852000 AT bennettkathleen comparingprimarypreventionwithsecondarypreventiontoexplaindecreasingcoronaryheartdiseasedeathratesinireland19852000 AT shelleyemer comparingprimarypreventionwithsecondarypreventiontoexplaindecreasingcoronaryheartdiseasedeathratesinireland19852000 AT unalbelgin comparingprimarypreventionwithsecondarypreventiontoexplaindecreasingcoronaryheartdiseasedeathratesinireland19852000 AT critchleyjuliaa comparingprimarypreventionwithsecondarypreventiontoexplaindecreasingcoronaryheartdiseasedeathratesinireland19852000 AT capewellsimon comparingprimarypreventionwithsecondarypreventiontoexplaindecreasingcoronaryheartdiseasedeathratesinireland19852000 |