Cargando…

Reproducibility of onset and recovery oxygen uptake kinetics in moderately impaired patients with chronic heart failure

Oxygen (O(2)) kinetics reflect the ability to adapt to or recover from exercise that is indicative of daily life. In patients with chronic heart failure (CHF), parameters of O(2) kinetics have shown to be useful for clinical purposes like grading of functional impairment and assessment of prognosis....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kemps, Hareld M. C., De Vries, Wouter R., Hoogeveen, Adwin R., Zonderland, Maria L., Thijssen, Eric J. M., Schep, Goof
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1914232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17277937
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-007-0398-7
_version_ 1782134108328034304
author Kemps, Hareld M. C.
De Vries, Wouter R.
Hoogeveen, Adwin R.
Zonderland, Maria L.
Thijssen, Eric J. M.
Schep, Goof
author_facet Kemps, Hareld M. C.
De Vries, Wouter R.
Hoogeveen, Adwin R.
Zonderland, Maria L.
Thijssen, Eric J. M.
Schep, Goof
author_sort Kemps, Hareld M. C.
collection PubMed
description Oxygen (O(2)) kinetics reflect the ability to adapt to or recover from exercise that is indicative of daily life. In patients with chronic heart failure (CHF), parameters of O(2) kinetics have shown to be useful for clinical purposes like grading of functional impairment and assessment of prognosis. This study compared the goodness of fit and reproducibility of previously described methods to assess O(2) kinetics in these patients. Nineteen CHF patients, New York Heart Association class II–III, performed two constant-load tests on a cycle ergometer at 50% of the maximum workload. Time constants of O(2) onset- and recovery kinetics (τ) were calculated by mono-exponential modeling with four different sampling intervals (5 and 10 s, 5 and 8 breaths). The goodness of fit was expressed as the coefficient of determination (R(2)). Onset kinetics were also evaluated by the mean response time (MRT). Considering O(2) onset kinetics, τ showed a significant inverse correlation with peak- [Formula: see text] (R = −0.88, using 10 s sampling intervals). The limits of agreement of both τ and MRT, however, were not clinically acceptable. O(2) recovery kinetics yielded better reproducibility and goodness of fit. Using the most optimal sampling interval (5 breaths), a change of at least 13 s in τ is needed to exceed normal test-to-test variations. In conclusion, O(2) recovery kinetics are more reproducible for clinical purposes than O(2) onset kinetics in moderately impaired patients with CHF. It should be recognized that this observation cannot be assumed to be generalizable to more severely impaired CHF patients.
format Text
id pubmed-1914232
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-19142322007-07-17 Reproducibility of onset and recovery oxygen uptake kinetics in moderately impaired patients with chronic heart failure Kemps, Hareld M. C. De Vries, Wouter R. Hoogeveen, Adwin R. Zonderland, Maria L. Thijssen, Eric J. M. Schep, Goof Eur J Appl Physiol Original Article Oxygen (O(2)) kinetics reflect the ability to adapt to or recover from exercise that is indicative of daily life. In patients with chronic heart failure (CHF), parameters of O(2) kinetics have shown to be useful for clinical purposes like grading of functional impairment and assessment of prognosis. This study compared the goodness of fit and reproducibility of previously described methods to assess O(2) kinetics in these patients. Nineteen CHF patients, New York Heart Association class II–III, performed two constant-load tests on a cycle ergometer at 50% of the maximum workload. Time constants of O(2) onset- and recovery kinetics (τ) were calculated by mono-exponential modeling with four different sampling intervals (5 and 10 s, 5 and 8 breaths). The goodness of fit was expressed as the coefficient of determination (R(2)). Onset kinetics were also evaluated by the mean response time (MRT). Considering O(2) onset kinetics, τ showed a significant inverse correlation with peak- [Formula: see text] (R = −0.88, using 10 s sampling intervals). The limits of agreement of both τ and MRT, however, were not clinically acceptable. O(2) recovery kinetics yielded better reproducibility and goodness of fit. Using the most optimal sampling interval (5 breaths), a change of at least 13 s in τ is needed to exceed normal test-to-test variations. In conclusion, O(2) recovery kinetics are more reproducible for clinical purposes than O(2) onset kinetics in moderately impaired patients with CHF. It should be recognized that this observation cannot be assumed to be generalizable to more severely impaired CHF patients. Springer-Verlag 2007-02-03 2007-05 /pmc/articles/PMC1914232/ /pubmed/17277937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-007-0398-7 Text en © Springer-Verlag 2007
spellingShingle Original Article
Kemps, Hareld M. C.
De Vries, Wouter R.
Hoogeveen, Adwin R.
Zonderland, Maria L.
Thijssen, Eric J. M.
Schep, Goof
Reproducibility of onset and recovery oxygen uptake kinetics in moderately impaired patients with chronic heart failure
title Reproducibility of onset and recovery oxygen uptake kinetics in moderately impaired patients with chronic heart failure
title_full Reproducibility of onset and recovery oxygen uptake kinetics in moderately impaired patients with chronic heart failure
title_fullStr Reproducibility of onset and recovery oxygen uptake kinetics in moderately impaired patients with chronic heart failure
title_full_unstemmed Reproducibility of onset and recovery oxygen uptake kinetics in moderately impaired patients with chronic heart failure
title_short Reproducibility of onset and recovery oxygen uptake kinetics in moderately impaired patients with chronic heart failure
title_sort reproducibility of onset and recovery oxygen uptake kinetics in moderately impaired patients with chronic heart failure
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1914232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17277937
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-007-0398-7
work_keys_str_mv AT kempshareldmc reproducibilityofonsetandrecoveryoxygenuptakekineticsinmoderatelyimpairedpatientswithchronicheartfailure
AT devrieswouterr reproducibilityofonsetandrecoveryoxygenuptakekineticsinmoderatelyimpairedpatientswithchronicheartfailure
AT hoogeveenadwinr reproducibilityofonsetandrecoveryoxygenuptakekineticsinmoderatelyimpairedpatientswithchronicheartfailure
AT zonderlandmarial reproducibilityofonsetandrecoveryoxygenuptakekineticsinmoderatelyimpairedpatientswithchronicheartfailure
AT thijssenericjm reproducibilityofonsetandrecoveryoxygenuptakekineticsinmoderatelyimpairedpatientswithchronicheartfailure
AT schepgoof reproducibilityofonsetandrecoveryoxygenuptakekineticsinmoderatelyimpairedpatientswithchronicheartfailure