Cargando…
The age and evolution of an antiviral resistance mutation in Drosophila melanogaster
What selective processes underlie the evolution of parasites and their hosts? Arms-race models propose that new host-resistance mutations or parasite counter-adaptations arise and sweep to fixation. Frequency-dependent models propose that selection favours pathogens adapted to the most common host g...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1914336/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17550883 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.0611 |
_version_ | 1782134127091253248 |
---|---|
author | Bangham, Jenny Obbard, Darren J Kim, Kang-Wook Haddrill, Penelope R Jiggins, Francis M |
author_facet | Bangham, Jenny Obbard, Darren J Kim, Kang-Wook Haddrill, Penelope R Jiggins, Francis M |
author_sort | Bangham, Jenny |
collection | PubMed |
description | What selective processes underlie the evolution of parasites and their hosts? Arms-race models propose that new host-resistance mutations or parasite counter-adaptations arise and sweep to fixation. Frequency-dependent models propose that selection favours pathogens adapted to the most common host genotypes, conferring an advantage to rare host genotypes. Distinguishing between these models is empirically difficult. The maintenance of disease-resistance polymorphisms has been studied in detail in plants, but less so in animals, and rarely in natural populations. We have made a detailed study of genetic variation in host resistance in a natural animal population, Drosophila melanogaster, and its natural pathogen, the sigma virus. We confirm previous findings that a single (albeit complex) mutation in the gene ref(2)P confers resistance against sigma and show that this mutation has increased in frequency under positive selection. Previous studies suggested that ref(2)P polymorphism reflects the progress of a very recent selective sweep, and that in Europe during the 1980s, this was followed by a sweep of a sigma virus strain able to infect flies carrying this mutation. We find that the ref(2)P resistance mutation is considerably older than the recent spread of this viral strain and suggest that—possibly because it is recessive—the initial spread of the resistance mutation was very slow. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1914336 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-19143362007-09-19 The age and evolution of an antiviral resistance mutation in Drosophila melanogaster Bangham, Jenny Obbard, Darren J Kim, Kang-Wook Haddrill, Penelope R Jiggins, Francis M Proc Biol Sci Research Article What selective processes underlie the evolution of parasites and their hosts? Arms-race models propose that new host-resistance mutations or parasite counter-adaptations arise and sweep to fixation. Frequency-dependent models propose that selection favours pathogens adapted to the most common host genotypes, conferring an advantage to rare host genotypes. Distinguishing between these models is empirically difficult. The maintenance of disease-resistance polymorphisms has been studied in detail in plants, but less so in animals, and rarely in natural populations. We have made a detailed study of genetic variation in host resistance in a natural animal population, Drosophila melanogaster, and its natural pathogen, the sigma virus. We confirm previous findings that a single (albeit complex) mutation in the gene ref(2)P confers resistance against sigma and show that this mutation has increased in frequency under positive selection. Previous studies suggested that ref(2)P polymorphism reflects the progress of a very recent selective sweep, and that in Europe during the 1980s, this was followed by a sweep of a sigma virus strain able to infect flies carrying this mutation. We find that the ref(2)P resistance mutation is considerably older than the recent spread of this viral strain and suggest that—possibly because it is recessive—the initial spread of the resistance mutation was very slow. The Royal Society 2007-06-05 2007-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC1914336/ /pubmed/17550883 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.0611 Text en Copyright © 2007 The Royal Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bangham, Jenny Obbard, Darren J Kim, Kang-Wook Haddrill, Penelope R Jiggins, Francis M The age and evolution of an antiviral resistance mutation in Drosophila melanogaster |
title | The age and evolution of an antiviral resistance mutation in Drosophila melanogaster |
title_full | The age and evolution of an antiviral resistance mutation in Drosophila melanogaster |
title_fullStr | The age and evolution of an antiviral resistance mutation in Drosophila melanogaster |
title_full_unstemmed | The age and evolution of an antiviral resistance mutation in Drosophila melanogaster |
title_short | The age and evolution of an antiviral resistance mutation in Drosophila melanogaster |
title_sort | age and evolution of an antiviral resistance mutation in drosophila melanogaster |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1914336/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17550883 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.0611 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT banghamjenny theageandevolutionofanantiviralresistancemutationindrosophilamelanogaster AT obbarddarrenj theageandevolutionofanantiviralresistancemutationindrosophilamelanogaster AT kimkangwook theageandevolutionofanantiviralresistancemutationindrosophilamelanogaster AT haddrillpeneloper theageandevolutionofanantiviralresistancemutationindrosophilamelanogaster AT jigginsfrancism theageandevolutionofanantiviralresistancemutationindrosophilamelanogaster AT banghamjenny ageandevolutionofanantiviralresistancemutationindrosophilamelanogaster AT obbarddarrenj ageandevolutionofanantiviralresistancemutationindrosophilamelanogaster AT kimkangwook ageandevolutionofanantiviralresistancemutationindrosophilamelanogaster AT haddrillpeneloper ageandevolutionofanantiviralresistancemutationindrosophilamelanogaster AT jigginsfrancism ageandevolutionofanantiviralresistancemutationindrosophilamelanogaster |