Cargando…

The age and evolution of an antiviral resistance mutation in Drosophila melanogaster

What selective processes underlie the evolution of parasites and their hosts? Arms-race models propose that new host-resistance mutations or parasite counter-adaptations arise and sweep to fixation. Frequency-dependent models propose that selection favours pathogens adapted to the most common host g...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bangham, Jenny, Obbard, Darren J, Kim, Kang-Wook, Haddrill, Penelope R, Jiggins, Francis M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1914336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17550883
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.0611
_version_ 1782134127091253248
author Bangham, Jenny
Obbard, Darren J
Kim, Kang-Wook
Haddrill, Penelope R
Jiggins, Francis M
author_facet Bangham, Jenny
Obbard, Darren J
Kim, Kang-Wook
Haddrill, Penelope R
Jiggins, Francis M
author_sort Bangham, Jenny
collection PubMed
description What selective processes underlie the evolution of parasites and their hosts? Arms-race models propose that new host-resistance mutations or parasite counter-adaptations arise and sweep to fixation. Frequency-dependent models propose that selection favours pathogens adapted to the most common host genotypes, conferring an advantage to rare host genotypes. Distinguishing between these models is empirically difficult. The maintenance of disease-resistance polymorphisms has been studied in detail in plants, but less so in animals, and rarely in natural populations. We have made a detailed study of genetic variation in host resistance in a natural animal population, Drosophila melanogaster, and its natural pathogen, the sigma virus. We confirm previous findings that a single (albeit complex) mutation in the gene ref(2)P confers resistance against sigma and show that this mutation has increased in frequency under positive selection. Previous studies suggested that ref(2)P polymorphism reflects the progress of a very recent selective sweep, and that in Europe during the 1980s, this was followed by a sweep of a sigma virus strain able to infect flies carrying this mutation. We find that the ref(2)P resistance mutation is considerably older than the recent spread of this viral strain and suggest that—possibly because it is recessive—the initial spread of the resistance mutation was very slow.
format Text
id pubmed-1914336
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-19143362007-09-19 The age and evolution of an antiviral resistance mutation in Drosophila melanogaster Bangham, Jenny Obbard, Darren J Kim, Kang-Wook Haddrill, Penelope R Jiggins, Francis M Proc Biol Sci Research Article What selective processes underlie the evolution of parasites and their hosts? Arms-race models propose that new host-resistance mutations or parasite counter-adaptations arise and sweep to fixation. Frequency-dependent models propose that selection favours pathogens adapted to the most common host genotypes, conferring an advantage to rare host genotypes. Distinguishing between these models is empirically difficult. The maintenance of disease-resistance polymorphisms has been studied in detail in plants, but less so in animals, and rarely in natural populations. We have made a detailed study of genetic variation in host resistance in a natural animal population, Drosophila melanogaster, and its natural pathogen, the sigma virus. We confirm previous findings that a single (albeit complex) mutation in the gene ref(2)P confers resistance against sigma and show that this mutation has increased in frequency under positive selection. Previous studies suggested that ref(2)P polymorphism reflects the progress of a very recent selective sweep, and that in Europe during the 1980s, this was followed by a sweep of a sigma virus strain able to infect flies carrying this mutation. We find that the ref(2)P resistance mutation is considerably older than the recent spread of this viral strain and suggest that—possibly because it is recessive—the initial spread of the resistance mutation was very slow. The Royal Society 2007-06-05 2007-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC1914336/ /pubmed/17550883 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.0611 Text en Copyright © 2007 The Royal Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bangham, Jenny
Obbard, Darren J
Kim, Kang-Wook
Haddrill, Penelope R
Jiggins, Francis M
The age and evolution of an antiviral resistance mutation in Drosophila melanogaster
title The age and evolution of an antiviral resistance mutation in Drosophila melanogaster
title_full The age and evolution of an antiviral resistance mutation in Drosophila melanogaster
title_fullStr The age and evolution of an antiviral resistance mutation in Drosophila melanogaster
title_full_unstemmed The age and evolution of an antiviral resistance mutation in Drosophila melanogaster
title_short The age and evolution of an antiviral resistance mutation in Drosophila melanogaster
title_sort age and evolution of an antiviral resistance mutation in drosophila melanogaster
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1914336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17550883
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.0611
work_keys_str_mv AT banghamjenny theageandevolutionofanantiviralresistancemutationindrosophilamelanogaster
AT obbarddarrenj theageandevolutionofanantiviralresistancemutationindrosophilamelanogaster
AT kimkangwook theageandevolutionofanantiviralresistancemutationindrosophilamelanogaster
AT haddrillpeneloper theageandevolutionofanantiviralresistancemutationindrosophilamelanogaster
AT jigginsfrancism theageandevolutionofanantiviralresistancemutationindrosophilamelanogaster
AT banghamjenny ageandevolutionofanantiviralresistancemutationindrosophilamelanogaster
AT obbarddarrenj ageandevolutionofanantiviralresistancemutationindrosophilamelanogaster
AT kimkangwook ageandevolutionofanantiviralresistancemutationindrosophilamelanogaster
AT haddrillpeneloper ageandevolutionofanantiviralresistancemutationindrosophilamelanogaster
AT jigginsfrancism ageandevolutionofanantiviralresistancemutationindrosophilamelanogaster