Cargando…
Sarcomere Lattice Geometry Influences Cooperative Myosin Binding in Muscle
In muscle, force emerges from myosin binding with actin (forming a cross-bridge). This actomyosin binding depends upon myofilament geometry, kinetics of thin-filament Ca(2+) activation, and kinetics of cross-bridge cycling. Binding occurs within a compliant network of protein filaments where there i...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1914368/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17630823 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030115 |
_version_ | 1782134134411362304 |
---|---|
author | Tanner, Bertrand C. W Daniel, Thomas L Regnier, Michael |
author_facet | Tanner, Bertrand C. W Daniel, Thomas L Regnier, Michael |
author_sort | Tanner, Bertrand C. W |
collection | PubMed |
description | In muscle, force emerges from myosin binding with actin (forming a cross-bridge). This actomyosin binding depends upon myofilament geometry, kinetics of thin-filament Ca(2+) activation, and kinetics of cross-bridge cycling. Binding occurs within a compliant network of protein filaments where there is mechanical coupling between myosins along the thick-filament backbone and between actin monomers along the thin filament. Such mechanical coupling precludes using ordinary differential equation models when examining the effects of lattice geometry, kinetics, or compliance on force production. This study uses two stochastically driven, spatially explicit models to predict levels of cross-bridge binding, force, thin-filament Ca(2+) activation, and ATP utilization. One model incorporates the 2-to-1 ratio of thin to thick filaments of vertebrate striated muscle (multi-filament model), while the other comprises only one thick and one thin filament (two-filament model). Simulations comparing these models show that the multi-filament predictions of force, fractional cross-bridge binding, and cross-bridge turnover are more consistent with published experimental values. Furthermore, the values predicted by the multi-filament model are greater than those values predicted by the two-filament model. These increases are larger than the relative increase of potential inter-filament interactions in the multi-filament model versus the two-filament model. This amplification of coordinated cross-bridge binding and cycling indicates a mechanism of cooperativity that depends on sarcomere lattice geometry, specifically the ratio and arrangement of myofilaments. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1914368 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-19143682007-07-26 Sarcomere Lattice Geometry Influences Cooperative Myosin Binding in Muscle Tanner, Bertrand C. W Daniel, Thomas L Regnier, Michael PLoS Comput Biol Research Article In muscle, force emerges from myosin binding with actin (forming a cross-bridge). This actomyosin binding depends upon myofilament geometry, kinetics of thin-filament Ca(2+) activation, and kinetics of cross-bridge cycling. Binding occurs within a compliant network of protein filaments where there is mechanical coupling between myosins along the thick-filament backbone and between actin monomers along the thin filament. Such mechanical coupling precludes using ordinary differential equation models when examining the effects of lattice geometry, kinetics, or compliance on force production. This study uses two stochastically driven, spatially explicit models to predict levels of cross-bridge binding, force, thin-filament Ca(2+) activation, and ATP utilization. One model incorporates the 2-to-1 ratio of thin to thick filaments of vertebrate striated muscle (multi-filament model), while the other comprises only one thick and one thin filament (two-filament model). Simulations comparing these models show that the multi-filament predictions of force, fractional cross-bridge binding, and cross-bridge turnover are more consistent with published experimental values. Furthermore, the values predicted by the multi-filament model are greater than those values predicted by the two-filament model. These increases are larger than the relative increase of potential inter-filament interactions in the multi-filament model versus the two-filament model. This amplification of coordinated cross-bridge binding and cycling indicates a mechanism of cooperativity that depends on sarcomere lattice geometry, specifically the ratio and arrangement of myofilaments. Public Library of Science 2007-07 2007-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC1914368/ /pubmed/17630823 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030115 Text en © 2007 Tanner et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Tanner, Bertrand C. W Daniel, Thomas L Regnier, Michael Sarcomere Lattice Geometry Influences Cooperative Myosin Binding in Muscle |
title | Sarcomere Lattice Geometry Influences Cooperative Myosin Binding in Muscle |
title_full | Sarcomere Lattice Geometry Influences Cooperative Myosin Binding in Muscle |
title_fullStr | Sarcomere Lattice Geometry Influences Cooperative Myosin Binding in Muscle |
title_full_unstemmed | Sarcomere Lattice Geometry Influences Cooperative Myosin Binding in Muscle |
title_short | Sarcomere Lattice Geometry Influences Cooperative Myosin Binding in Muscle |
title_sort | sarcomere lattice geometry influences cooperative myosin binding in muscle |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1914368/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17630823 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030115 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tannerbertrandcw sarcomerelatticegeometryinfluencescooperativemyosinbindinginmuscle AT danielthomasl sarcomerelatticegeometryinfluencescooperativemyosinbindinginmuscle AT regniermichael sarcomerelatticegeometryinfluencescooperativemyosinbindinginmuscle |