Cargando…

Association between gross motor function (GMFCS) and manual ability (MACS) in children with cerebral palsy. A population-based study of 359 children

BACKGROUND: The Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) has become an important tool to describe motor function in children with Cerebral Palsy (CP). The Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) was developed recently as a corresponding classification of manual ability. The aim of this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carnahan, Katharina Delhusen, Arner, Marianne, Hägglund, Gunnar
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1919364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17584944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-8-50
_version_ 1782134162632736768
author Carnahan, Katharina Delhusen
Arner, Marianne
Hägglund, Gunnar
author_facet Carnahan, Katharina Delhusen
Arner, Marianne
Hägglund, Gunnar
author_sort Carnahan, Katharina Delhusen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) has become an important tool to describe motor function in children with Cerebral Palsy (CP). The Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) was developed recently as a corresponding classification of manual ability. The aim of this study was to describe the association between gross motor function and manual ability in a total population of children with cerebral palsy. METHODS: 365 children, born 1992 to 2001, who were registered in a population-based health care programme (CPUP) for children with CP living in the south of Sweden were included in the study. GMFCS was evaluated by the child's physiotherapist and MACS by the occupational therapist. CP diagnosis and subtype were determined by the neuropaediatrician at or after the age of four. RESULTS: GMFCS levels were available in all 365 children, MACS levels in 359 (98%). There was a poor overall correlation between gross motor function and manual ability. However, different associations between gross motor function and manual ability were found in the different diagnostic subtypes. Children with spastic hemiplegia generally had a lower level of manual ability than gross motor function (p < 0.001). The reverse association was generally found in children with spastic diplegia (p < 0.001). Children with dyskinetic CP had large limitations in both gross motor function and manual ability, with no significant discrepancy between GMFCS and MACS levels. CONCLUSION: Gross motor function and manual ability are often discrepant in children with CP, and the patterns seem to vary across the different subgroups based on the predominant neurological findings. To give a complete clinical picture when evaluating these children, both aspects have to be described. The GMFCS and the MACS seem to work well in this context and seem very useful in population-based studies, in health care registers for children with CP, and in clinical practice.
format Text
id pubmed-1919364
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-19193642007-07-14 Association between gross motor function (GMFCS) and manual ability (MACS) in children with cerebral palsy. A population-based study of 359 children Carnahan, Katharina Delhusen Arner, Marianne Hägglund, Gunnar BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) has become an important tool to describe motor function in children with Cerebral Palsy (CP). The Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) was developed recently as a corresponding classification of manual ability. The aim of this study was to describe the association between gross motor function and manual ability in a total population of children with cerebral palsy. METHODS: 365 children, born 1992 to 2001, who were registered in a population-based health care programme (CPUP) for children with CP living in the south of Sweden were included in the study. GMFCS was evaluated by the child's physiotherapist and MACS by the occupational therapist. CP diagnosis and subtype were determined by the neuropaediatrician at or after the age of four. RESULTS: GMFCS levels were available in all 365 children, MACS levels in 359 (98%). There was a poor overall correlation between gross motor function and manual ability. However, different associations between gross motor function and manual ability were found in the different diagnostic subtypes. Children with spastic hemiplegia generally had a lower level of manual ability than gross motor function (p < 0.001). The reverse association was generally found in children with spastic diplegia (p < 0.001). Children with dyskinetic CP had large limitations in both gross motor function and manual ability, with no significant discrepancy between GMFCS and MACS levels. CONCLUSION: Gross motor function and manual ability are often discrepant in children with CP, and the patterns seem to vary across the different subgroups based on the predominant neurological findings. To give a complete clinical picture when evaluating these children, both aspects have to be described. The GMFCS and the MACS seem to work well in this context and seem very useful in population-based studies, in health care registers for children with CP, and in clinical practice. BioMed Central 2007-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC1919364/ /pubmed/17584944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-8-50 Text en Copyright © 2007 Carnahan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Carnahan, Katharina Delhusen
Arner, Marianne
Hägglund, Gunnar
Association between gross motor function (GMFCS) and manual ability (MACS) in children with cerebral palsy. A population-based study of 359 children
title Association between gross motor function (GMFCS) and manual ability (MACS) in children with cerebral palsy. A population-based study of 359 children
title_full Association between gross motor function (GMFCS) and manual ability (MACS) in children with cerebral palsy. A population-based study of 359 children
title_fullStr Association between gross motor function (GMFCS) and manual ability (MACS) in children with cerebral palsy. A population-based study of 359 children
title_full_unstemmed Association between gross motor function (GMFCS) and manual ability (MACS) in children with cerebral palsy. A population-based study of 359 children
title_short Association between gross motor function (GMFCS) and manual ability (MACS) in children with cerebral palsy. A population-based study of 359 children
title_sort association between gross motor function (gmfcs) and manual ability (macs) in children with cerebral palsy. a population-based study of 359 children
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1919364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17584944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-8-50
work_keys_str_mv AT carnahankatharinadelhusen associationbetweengrossmotorfunctiongmfcsandmanualabilitymacsinchildrenwithcerebralpalsyapopulationbasedstudyof359children
AT arnermarianne associationbetweengrossmotorfunctiongmfcsandmanualabilitymacsinchildrenwithcerebralpalsyapopulationbasedstudyof359children
AT hagglundgunnar associationbetweengrossmotorfunctiongmfcsandmanualabilitymacsinchildrenwithcerebralpalsyapopulationbasedstudyof359children