Cargando…
Automated inter-rater reliability assessment and electronic data collection in a multi-center breast cancer study
BACKGROUND: The choice between paper data collection methods and electronic data collection (EDC) methods has become a key question for clinical researchers. There remains a need to examine potential benefits, efficiencies, and innovations associated with an EDC system in a multi-center medical reco...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1919388/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17577410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-7-23 |
_version_ | 1782134168290852864 |
---|---|
author | Thwin, Soe Soe Clough-Gorr, Kerri M McCarty, Maribet C Lash, Timothy L Alford, Sharon H Buist, Diana SM Enger, Shelley M Field, Terry S Frost, Floyd Wei, Feifei Silliman, Rebecca A |
author_facet | Thwin, Soe Soe Clough-Gorr, Kerri M McCarty, Maribet C Lash, Timothy L Alford, Sharon H Buist, Diana SM Enger, Shelley M Field, Terry S Frost, Floyd Wei, Feifei Silliman, Rebecca A |
author_sort | Thwin, Soe Soe |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The choice between paper data collection methods and electronic data collection (EDC) methods has become a key question for clinical researchers. There remains a need to examine potential benefits, efficiencies, and innovations associated with an EDC system in a multi-center medical record review study. METHODS: A computer-based automated menu-driven system with 658 data fields was developed for a cohort study of women aged 65 years or older, diagnosed with invasive histologically confirmed primary breast cancer (N = 1859), at 6 Cancer Research Network sites. Medical record review with direct data entry into the EDC system was implemented. An inter-rater and intra-rater reliability (IRR) system was developed using a modified version of the EDC. RESULTS: Automation of EDC accelerated the flow of study information and resulted in an efficient data collection process. Data collection time was reduced by approximately four months compared to the project schedule and funded time available for manuscript preparation increased by 12 months. In addition, an innovative modified version of the EDC permitted an automated evaluation of inter-rater and intra-rater reliability across six data collection sites. CONCLUSION: Automated EDC is a powerful tool for research efficiency and innovation, especially when multiple data collection sites are involved. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1919388 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-19193882007-07-14 Automated inter-rater reliability assessment and electronic data collection in a multi-center breast cancer study Thwin, Soe Soe Clough-Gorr, Kerri M McCarty, Maribet C Lash, Timothy L Alford, Sharon H Buist, Diana SM Enger, Shelley M Field, Terry S Frost, Floyd Wei, Feifei Silliman, Rebecca A BMC Med Res Methodol Technical Advance BACKGROUND: The choice between paper data collection methods and electronic data collection (EDC) methods has become a key question for clinical researchers. There remains a need to examine potential benefits, efficiencies, and innovations associated with an EDC system in a multi-center medical record review study. METHODS: A computer-based automated menu-driven system with 658 data fields was developed for a cohort study of women aged 65 years or older, diagnosed with invasive histologically confirmed primary breast cancer (N = 1859), at 6 Cancer Research Network sites. Medical record review with direct data entry into the EDC system was implemented. An inter-rater and intra-rater reliability (IRR) system was developed using a modified version of the EDC. RESULTS: Automation of EDC accelerated the flow of study information and resulted in an efficient data collection process. Data collection time was reduced by approximately four months compared to the project schedule and funded time available for manuscript preparation increased by 12 months. In addition, an innovative modified version of the EDC permitted an automated evaluation of inter-rater and intra-rater reliability across six data collection sites. CONCLUSION: Automated EDC is a powerful tool for research efficiency and innovation, especially when multiple data collection sites are involved. BioMed Central 2007-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC1919388/ /pubmed/17577410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-7-23 Text en Copyright © 2007 Thwin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Technical Advance Thwin, Soe Soe Clough-Gorr, Kerri M McCarty, Maribet C Lash, Timothy L Alford, Sharon H Buist, Diana SM Enger, Shelley M Field, Terry S Frost, Floyd Wei, Feifei Silliman, Rebecca A Automated inter-rater reliability assessment and electronic data collection in a multi-center breast cancer study |
title | Automated inter-rater reliability assessment and electronic data collection in a multi-center breast cancer study |
title_full | Automated inter-rater reliability assessment and electronic data collection in a multi-center breast cancer study |
title_fullStr | Automated inter-rater reliability assessment and electronic data collection in a multi-center breast cancer study |
title_full_unstemmed | Automated inter-rater reliability assessment and electronic data collection in a multi-center breast cancer study |
title_short | Automated inter-rater reliability assessment and electronic data collection in a multi-center breast cancer study |
title_sort | automated inter-rater reliability assessment and electronic data collection in a multi-center breast cancer study |
topic | Technical Advance |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1919388/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17577410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-7-23 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thwinsoesoe automatedinterraterreliabilityassessmentandelectronicdatacollectioninamulticenterbreastcancerstudy AT cloughgorrkerrim automatedinterraterreliabilityassessmentandelectronicdatacollectioninamulticenterbreastcancerstudy AT mccartymaribetc automatedinterraterreliabilityassessmentandelectronicdatacollectioninamulticenterbreastcancerstudy AT lashtimothyl automatedinterraterreliabilityassessmentandelectronicdatacollectioninamulticenterbreastcancerstudy AT alfordsharonh automatedinterraterreliabilityassessmentandelectronicdatacollectioninamulticenterbreastcancerstudy AT buistdianasm automatedinterraterreliabilityassessmentandelectronicdatacollectioninamulticenterbreastcancerstudy AT engershelleym automatedinterraterreliabilityassessmentandelectronicdatacollectioninamulticenterbreastcancerstudy AT fieldterrys automatedinterraterreliabilityassessmentandelectronicdatacollectioninamulticenterbreastcancerstudy AT frostfloyd automatedinterraterreliabilityassessmentandelectronicdatacollectioninamulticenterbreastcancerstudy AT weifeifei automatedinterraterreliabilityassessmentandelectronicdatacollectioninamulticenterbreastcancerstudy AT sillimanrebeccaa automatedinterraterreliabilityassessmentandelectronicdatacollectioninamulticenterbreastcancerstudy |