Cargando…

Automated inter-rater reliability assessment and electronic data collection in a multi-center breast cancer study

BACKGROUND: The choice between paper data collection methods and electronic data collection (EDC) methods has become a key question for clinical researchers. There remains a need to examine potential benefits, efficiencies, and innovations associated with an EDC system in a multi-center medical reco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thwin, Soe Soe, Clough-Gorr, Kerri M, McCarty, Maribet C, Lash, Timothy L, Alford, Sharon H, Buist, Diana SM, Enger, Shelley M, Field, Terry S, Frost, Floyd, Wei, Feifei, Silliman, Rebecca A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1919388/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17577410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-7-23
_version_ 1782134168290852864
author Thwin, Soe Soe
Clough-Gorr, Kerri M
McCarty, Maribet C
Lash, Timothy L
Alford, Sharon H
Buist, Diana SM
Enger, Shelley M
Field, Terry S
Frost, Floyd
Wei, Feifei
Silliman, Rebecca A
author_facet Thwin, Soe Soe
Clough-Gorr, Kerri M
McCarty, Maribet C
Lash, Timothy L
Alford, Sharon H
Buist, Diana SM
Enger, Shelley M
Field, Terry S
Frost, Floyd
Wei, Feifei
Silliman, Rebecca A
author_sort Thwin, Soe Soe
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The choice between paper data collection methods and electronic data collection (EDC) methods has become a key question for clinical researchers. There remains a need to examine potential benefits, efficiencies, and innovations associated with an EDC system in a multi-center medical record review study. METHODS: A computer-based automated menu-driven system with 658 data fields was developed for a cohort study of women aged 65 years or older, diagnosed with invasive histologically confirmed primary breast cancer (N = 1859), at 6 Cancer Research Network sites. Medical record review with direct data entry into the EDC system was implemented. An inter-rater and intra-rater reliability (IRR) system was developed using a modified version of the EDC. RESULTS: Automation of EDC accelerated the flow of study information and resulted in an efficient data collection process. Data collection time was reduced by approximately four months compared to the project schedule and funded time available for manuscript preparation increased by 12 months. In addition, an innovative modified version of the EDC permitted an automated evaluation of inter-rater and intra-rater reliability across six data collection sites. CONCLUSION: Automated EDC is a powerful tool for research efficiency and innovation, especially when multiple data collection sites are involved.
format Text
id pubmed-1919388
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-19193882007-07-14 Automated inter-rater reliability assessment and electronic data collection in a multi-center breast cancer study Thwin, Soe Soe Clough-Gorr, Kerri M McCarty, Maribet C Lash, Timothy L Alford, Sharon H Buist, Diana SM Enger, Shelley M Field, Terry S Frost, Floyd Wei, Feifei Silliman, Rebecca A BMC Med Res Methodol Technical Advance BACKGROUND: The choice between paper data collection methods and electronic data collection (EDC) methods has become a key question for clinical researchers. There remains a need to examine potential benefits, efficiencies, and innovations associated with an EDC system in a multi-center medical record review study. METHODS: A computer-based automated menu-driven system with 658 data fields was developed for a cohort study of women aged 65 years or older, diagnosed with invasive histologically confirmed primary breast cancer (N = 1859), at 6 Cancer Research Network sites. Medical record review with direct data entry into the EDC system was implemented. An inter-rater and intra-rater reliability (IRR) system was developed using a modified version of the EDC. RESULTS: Automation of EDC accelerated the flow of study information and resulted in an efficient data collection process. Data collection time was reduced by approximately four months compared to the project schedule and funded time available for manuscript preparation increased by 12 months. In addition, an innovative modified version of the EDC permitted an automated evaluation of inter-rater and intra-rater reliability across six data collection sites. CONCLUSION: Automated EDC is a powerful tool for research efficiency and innovation, especially when multiple data collection sites are involved. BioMed Central 2007-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC1919388/ /pubmed/17577410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-7-23 Text en Copyright © 2007 Thwin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Advance
Thwin, Soe Soe
Clough-Gorr, Kerri M
McCarty, Maribet C
Lash, Timothy L
Alford, Sharon H
Buist, Diana SM
Enger, Shelley M
Field, Terry S
Frost, Floyd
Wei, Feifei
Silliman, Rebecca A
Automated inter-rater reliability assessment and electronic data collection in a multi-center breast cancer study
title Automated inter-rater reliability assessment and electronic data collection in a multi-center breast cancer study
title_full Automated inter-rater reliability assessment and electronic data collection in a multi-center breast cancer study
title_fullStr Automated inter-rater reliability assessment and electronic data collection in a multi-center breast cancer study
title_full_unstemmed Automated inter-rater reliability assessment and electronic data collection in a multi-center breast cancer study
title_short Automated inter-rater reliability assessment and electronic data collection in a multi-center breast cancer study
title_sort automated inter-rater reliability assessment and electronic data collection in a multi-center breast cancer study
topic Technical Advance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1919388/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17577410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-7-23
work_keys_str_mv AT thwinsoesoe automatedinterraterreliabilityassessmentandelectronicdatacollectioninamulticenterbreastcancerstudy
AT cloughgorrkerrim automatedinterraterreliabilityassessmentandelectronicdatacollectioninamulticenterbreastcancerstudy
AT mccartymaribetc automatedinterraterreliabilityassessmentandelectronicdatacollectioninamulticenterbreastcancerstudy
AT lashtimothyl automatedinterraterreliabilityassessmentandelectronicdatacollectioninamulticenterbreastcancerstudy
AT alfordsharonh automatedinterraterreliabilityassessmentandelectronicdatacollectioninamulticenterbreastcancerstudy
AT buistdianasm automatedinterraterreliabilityassessmentandelectronicdatacollectioninamulticenterbreastcancerstudy
AT engershelleym automatedinterraterreliabilityassessmentandelectronicdatacollectioninamulticenterbreastcancerstudy
AT fieldterrys automatedinterraterreliabilityassessmentandelectronicdatacollectioninamulticenterbreastcancerstudy
AT frostfloyd automatedinterraterreliabilityassessmentandelectronicdatacollectioninamulticenterbreastcancerstudy
AT weifeifei automatedinterraterreliabilityassessmentandelectronicdatacollectioninamulticenterbreastcancerstudy
AT sillimanrebeccaa automatedinterraterreliabilityassessmentandelectronicdatacollectioninamulticenterbreastcancerstudy