Cargando…

Knowledge translation on dementia: a cluster randomized trial to compare a blended learning approach with a "classical" advanced training in GP quality circles

BACKGROUND: Thus far important findings regarding the dementia syndrome have been implemented into patients' medical care only inadequately. A professional training accounting for both, general practitioners' (GP) needs and learning preferences as well as care-relevant aspects could be a m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vollmar, Horst C, Butzlaff, Martin E, Lefering, Rolf, Rieger, Monika A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1931439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17587452
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-7-92
_version_ 1782134277940445184
author Vollmar, Horst C
Butzlaff, Martin E
Lefering, Rolf
Rieger, Monika A
author_facet Vollmar, Horst C
Butzlaff, Martin E
Lefering, Rolf
Rieger, Monika A
author_sort Vollmar, Horst C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Thus far important findings regarding the dementia syndrome have been implemented into patients' medical care only inadequately. A professional training accounting for both, general practitioners' (GP) needs and learning preferences as well as care-relevant aspects could be a major step towards improving medical care. In the WIDA-study, entitled "Knowledge translation on dementia in general practice" two different training concepts are developed, implemented and evaluated. Both concepts are building on an evidence-based, GP-related dementia guideline and communicate the guideline's essential insights. METHODS/DESIGN: Both development and implementation emphasize a procedure that is well-accepted in practice and, thus, can achieve a high degree of external validity. This is particularly guaranteed through the preparation of training material and the fact that general practitioners' quality circles (QC) are addressed. The evaluation of the two training concepts is carried out by comparing two groups of GPs to which several quality circles have been randomly assigned. The primary outcome is the GPs' knowledge gain. Secondary outcomes are designed to indicate the training's potential effects on the GPs' practical actions. In the first training concept (study arm A) GPs participate in a structured case discussion prepared for by internet-based learning material ("blended-learning" approach). The second training concept (study arm B) relies on frontal medical training in the form of a slide presentation and follow-up discussion ("classical" approach). DISCUSSION: This paper presents the outline of a cluster-randomized trial which has been peer reviewed and support by a national funding organization – Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) – and is approved by an ethics commission. The data collection has started in August 2006 and the results will be published independently of the study's outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials [ISRCTN36550981]
format Text
id pubmed-1931439
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-19314392007-07-24 Knowledge translation on dementia: a cluster randomized trial to compare a blended learning approach with a "classical" advanced training in GP quality circles Vollmar, Horst C Butzlaff, Martin E Lefering, Rolf Rieger, Monika A BMC Health Serv Res Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Thus far important findings regarding the dementia syndrome have been implemented into patients' medical care only inadequately. A professional training accounting for both, general practitioners' (GP) needs and learning preferences as well as care-relevant aspects could be a major step towards improving medical care. In the WIDA-study, entitled "Knowledge translation on dementia in general practice" two different training concepts are developed, implemented and evaluated. Both concepts are building on an evidence-based, GP-related dementia guideline and communicate the guideline's essential insights. METHODS/DESIGN: Both development and implementation emphasize a procedure that is well-accepted in practice and, thus, can achieve a high degree of external validity. This is particularly guaranteed through the preparation of training material and the fact that general practitioners' quality circles (QC) are addressed. The evaluation of the two training concepts is carried out by comparing two groups of GPs to which several quality circles have been randomly assigned. The primary outcome is the GPs' knowledge gain. Secondary outcomes are designed to indicate the training's potential effects on the GPs' practical actions. In the first training concept (study arm A) GPs participate in a structured case discussion prepared for by internet-based learning material ("blended-learning" approach). The second training concept (study arm B) relies on frontal medical training in the form of a slide presentation and follow-up discussion ("classical" approach). DISCUSSION: This paper presents the outline of a cluster-randomized trial which has been peer reviewed and support by a national funding organization – Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) – and is approved by an ethics commission. The data collection has started in August 2006 and the results will be published independently of the study's outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials [ISRCTN36550981] BioMed Central 2007-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC1931439/ /pubmed/17587452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-7-92 Text en Copyright © 2007 Vollmar et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Vollmar, Horst C
Butzlaff, Martin E
Lefering, Rolf
Rieger, Monika A
Knowledge translation on dementia: a cluster randomized trial to compare a blended learning approach with a "classical" advanced training in GP quality circles
title Knowledge translation on dementia: a cluster randomized trial to compare a blended learning approach with a "classical" advanced training in GP quality circles
title_full Knowledge translation on dementia: a cluster randomized trial to compare a blended learning approach with a "classical" advanced training in GP quality circles
title_fullStr Knowledge translation on dementia: a cluster randomized trial to compare a blended learning approach with a "classical" advanced training in GP quality circles
title_full_unstemmed Knowledge translation on dementia: a cluster randomized trial to compare a blended learning approach with a "classical" advanced training in GP quality circles
title_short Knowledge translation on dementia: a cluster randomized trial to compare a blended learning approach with a "classical" advanced training in GP quality circles
title_sort knowledge translation on dementia: a cluster randomized trial to compare a blended learning approach with a "classical" advanced training in gp quality circles
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1931439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17587452
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-7-92
work_keys_str_mv AT vollmarhorstc knowledgetranslationondementiaaclusterrandomizedtrialtocompareablendedlearningapproachwithaclassicaladvancedtrainingingpqualitycircles
AT butzlaffmartine knowledgetranslationondementiaaclusterrandomizedtrialtocompareablendedlearningapproachwithaclassicaladvancedtrainingingpqualitycircles
AT leferingrolf knowledgetranslationondementiaaclusterrandomizedtrialtocompareablendedlearningapproachwithaclassicaladvancedtrainingingpqualitycircles
AT riegermonikaa knowledgetranslationondementiaaclusterrandomizedtrialtocompareablendedlearningapproachwithaclassicaladvancedtrainingingpqualitycircles