Cargando…
Disproportionate Intrauterine Growth Intervention Trial At Term: DIGITAT
BACKGROUND: Around 80% of intrauterine growth restricted (IUGR) infants are born at term. They have an increase in perinatal mortality and morbidity including behavioral problems, minor developmental delay and spastic cerebral palsy. Management is controversial, in particular the decision whether to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1933438/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17623077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-7-12 |
_version_ | 1782134328031969280 |
---|---|
author | Boers, Kim E Bijlenga, Denise Mol, Ben WJ LeCessie, Saskia Birnie, Erwin van Pampus, Marielle G Stigter, Rob H Bloemenkamp, Kitty WM van Meir, Claudia A van der Post, Joris AM Bekedam, Dick J Ribbert, Lucy SM Drogtrop, Addie P van der Salm, Paulien CM Huisjes, Anjoke JM Willekes, Christine Roumen, Frans JME Scheepers, Hubertina CJ de Boer, Karin Duvekot, Johannes J Thornton, Jim G Scherjon, Sicco A |
author_facet | Boers, Kim E Bijlenga, Denise Mol, Ben WJ LeCessie, Saskia Birnie, Erwin van Pampus, Marielle G Stigter, Rob H Bloemenkamp, Kitty WM van Meir, Claudia A van der Post, Joris AM Bekedam, Dick J Ribbert, Lucy SM Drogtrop, Addie P van der Salm, Paulien CM Huisjes, Anjoke JM Willekes, Christine Roumen, Frans JME Scheepers, Hubertina CJ de Boer, Karin Duvekot, Johannes J Thornton, Jim G Scherjon, Sicco A |
author_sort | Boers, Kim E |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Around 80% of intrauterine growth restricted (IUGR) infants are born at term. They have an increase in perinatal mortality and morbidity including behavioral problems, minor developmental delay and spastic cerebral palsy. Management is controversial, in particular the decision whether to induce labour or await spontaneous delivery with strict fetal and maternal surveillance. We propose a randomised trial to compare effectiveness, costs and maternal quality of life for induction of labour versus expectant management in women with a suspected IUGR fetus at term. METHODS/DESIGN: The proposed trial is a multi-centre randomised study in pregnant women who are suspected on clinical grounds of having an IUGR child at a gestational age between 36+0 and 41+0 weeks. After informed consent women will be randomly allocated to either induction of labour or expectant management with maternal and fetal monitoring. Randomisation will be web-based. The primary outcome measure will be a composite neonatal morbidity and mortality. Secondary outcomes will be severe maternal morbidity, maternal quality of life and costs. Moreover, we aim to assess neurodevelopmental and neurobehavioral outcome at two years as assessed by a postal enquiry (Child Behavioral Check List-CBCL and Ages and Stages Questionnaire-ASQ). Analysis will be by intention to treat. Quality of life analysis and a preference study will also be performed in the same study population. Health technology assessment with an economic analysis is part of this so called Digitat trial (Disproportionate Intrauterine Growth Intervention Trial At Term). The study aims to include 325 patients per arm. DISCUSSION: This trial will provide evidence for which strategy is superior in terms of neonatal and maternal morbidity and mortality, costs and maternal quality of life aspects. This will be the first randomised trial for IUGR at term. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register and ISRCTN-Register: ISRCTN10363217. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1933438 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-19334382007-07-26 Disproportionate Intrauterine Growth Intervention Trial At Term: DIGITAT Boers, Kim E Bijlenga, Denise Mol, Ben WJ LeCessie, Saskia Birnie, Erwin van Pampus, Marielle G Stigter, Rob H Bloemenkamp, Kitty WM van Meir, Claudia A van der Post, Joris AM Bekedam, Dick J Ribbert, Lucy SM Drogtrop, Addie P van der Salm, Paulien CM Huisjes, Anjoke JM Willekes, Christine Roumen, Frans JME Scheepers, Hubertina CJ de Boer, Karin Duvekot, Johannes J Thornton, Jim G Scherjon, Sicco A BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Around 80% of intrauterine growth restricted (IUGR) infants are born at term. They have an increase in perinatal mortality and morbidity including behavioral problems, minor developmental delay and spastic cerebral palsy. Management is controversial, in particular the decision whether to induce labour or await spontaneous delivery with strict fetal and maternal surveillance. We propose a randomised trial to compare effectiveness, costs and maternal quality of life for induction of labour versus expectant management in women with a suspected IUGR fetus at term. METHODS/DESIGN: The proposed trial is a multi-centre randomised study in pregnant women who are suspected on clinical grounds of having an IUGR child at a gestational age between 36+0 and 41+0 weeks. After informed consent women will be randomly allocated to either induction of labour or expectant management with maternal and fetal monitoring. Randomisation will be web-based. The primary outcome measure will be a composite neonatal morbidity and mortality. Secondary outcomes will be severe maternal morbidity, maternal quality of life and costs. Moreover, we aim to assess neurodevelopmental and neurobehavioral outcome at two years as assessed by a postal enquiry (Child Behavioral Check List-CBCL and Ages and Stages Questionnaire-ASQ). Analysis will be by intention to treat. Quality of life analysis and a preference study will also be performed in the same study population. Health technology assessment with an economic analysis is part of this so called Digitat trial (Disproportionate Intrauterine Growth Intervention Trial At Term). The study aims to include 325 patients per arm. DISCUSSION: This trial will provide evidence for which strategy is superior in terms of neonatal and maternal morbidity and mortality, costs and maternal quality of life aspects. This will be the first randomised trial for IUGR at term. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register and ISRCTN-Register: ISRCTN10363217. BioMed Central 2007-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC1933438/ /pubmed/17623077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-7-12 Text en Copyright © 2007 Boers et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Boers, Kim E Bijlenga, Denise Mol, Ben WJ LeCessie, Saskia Birnie, Erwin van Pampus, Marielle G Stigter, Rob H Bloemenkamp, Kitty WM van Meir, Claudia A van der Post, Joris AM Bekedam, Dick J Ribbert, Lucy SM Drogtrop, Addie P van der Salm, Paulien CM Huisjes, Anjoke JM Willekes, Christine Roumen, Frans JME Scheepers, Hubertina CJ de Boer, Karin Duvekot, Johannes J Thornton, Jim G Scherjon, Sicco A Disproportionate Intrauterine Growth Intervention Trial At Term: DIGITAT |
title | Disproportionate Intrauterine Growth Intervention Trial At Term: DIGITAT |
title_full | Disproportionate Intrauterine Growth Intervention Trial At Term: DIGITAT |
title_fullStr | Disproportionate Intrauterine Growth Intervention Trial At Term: DIGITAT |
title_full_unstemmed | Disproportionate Intrauterine Growth Intervention Trial At Term: DIGITAT |
title_short | Disproportionate Intrauterine Growth Intervention Trial At Term: DIGITAT |
title_sort | disproportionate intrauterine growth intervention trial at term: digitat |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1933438/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17623077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-7-12 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boerskime disproportionateintrauterinegrowthinterventiontrialattermdigitat AT bijlengadenise disproportionateintrauterinegrowthinterventiontrialattermdigitat AT molbenwj disproportionateintrauterinegrowthinterventiontrialattermdigitat AT lecessiesaskia disproportionateintrauterinegrowthinterventiontrialattermdigitat AT birnieerwin disproportionateintrauterinegrowthinterventiontrialattermdigitat AT vanpampusmarielleg disproportionateintrauterinegrowthinterventiontrialattermdigitat AT stigterrobh disproportionateintrauterinegrowthinterventiontrialattermdigitat AT bloemenkampkittywm disproportionateintrauterinegrowthinterventiontrialattermdigitat AT vanmeirclaudiaa disproportionateintrauterinegrowthinterventiontrialattermdigitat AT vanderpostjorisam disproportionateintrauterinegrowthinterventiontrialattermdigitat AT bekedamdickj disproportionateintrauterinegrowthinterventiontrialattermdigitat AT ribbertlucysm disproportionateintrauterinegrowthinterventiontrialattermdigitat AT drogtropaddiep disproportionateintrauterinegrowthinterventiontrialattermdigitat AT vandersalmpauliencm disproportionateintrauterinegrowthinterventiontrialattermdigitat AT huisjesanjokejm disproportionateintrauterinegrowthinterventiontrialattermdigitat AT willekeschristine disproportionateintrauterinegrowthinterventiontrialattermdigitat AT roumenfransjme disproportionateintrauterinegrowthinterventiontrialattermdigitat AT scheepershubertinacj disproportionateintrauterinegrowthinterventiontrialattermdigitat AT deboerkarin disproportionateintrauterinegrowthinterventiontrialattermdigitat AT duvekotjohannesj disproportionateintrauterinegrowthinterventiontrialattermdigitat AT thorntonjimg disproportionateintrauterinegrowthinterventiontrialattermdigitat AT scherjonsiccoa disproportionateintrauterinegrowthinterventiontrialattermdigitat |