Cargando…

The role of hydrophobic interactions in positioning of peripheral proteins in membranes

BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) structures of numerous peripheral membrane proteins have been determined. Biological activity, stability, and conformations of these proteins depend on their spatial positions with respect to the lipid bilayer. However, these positions are usually undetermined. RES...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lomize, Andrei L, Pogozheva, Irina D, Lomize, Mikhail A, Mosberg, Henry I
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1934363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17603894
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6807-7-44
_version_ 1782134343504756736
author Lomize, Andrei L
Pogozheva, Irina D
Lomize, Mikhail A
Mosberg, Henry I
author_facet Lomize, Andrei L
Pogozheva, Irina D
Lomize, Mikhail A
Mosberg, Henry I
author_sort Lomize, Andrei L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) structures of numerous peripheral membrane proteins have been determined. Biological activity, stability, and conformations of these proteins depend on their spatial positions with respect to the lipid bilayer. However, these positions are usually undetermined. RESULTS: We report the first large-scale computational study of monotopic/peripheral proteins with known 3D structures. The optimal translational and rotational positions of 476 proteins are determined by minimizing energy of protein transfer from water to the lipid bilayer, which is approximated by a hydrocarbon slab with a decadiene-like polarity and interfacial regions characterized by water-permeation profiles. Predicted membrane-binding sites, protein tilt angles and membrane penetration depths are consistent with spin-labeling, chemical modification, fluorescence, NMR, mutagenesis, and other experimental studies of 53 peripheral proteins and peptides. Experimental membrane binding affinities of peripheral proteins were reproduced in cases that did not involve a helix-coil transition, specific binding of lipids, or a predominantly electrostatic association. Coordinates of all examined peripheral proteins and peptides with the calculated hydrophobic membrane boundaries, subcellular localization, topology, structural classification, and experimental references are available through the Orientations of Proteins in Membranes (OPM) database. CONCLUSION: Positions of diverse peripheral proteins and peptides in the lipid bilayer can be accurately predicted using their 3D structures that represent a proper membrane-bound conformation and oligomeric state, and have membrane binding elements present. The success of the implicit solvation model suggests that hydrophobic interactions are usually sufficient to determine the spatial position of a protein in the membrane, even when electrostatic interactions or specific binding of lipids are substantial. Our results demonstrate that most peripheral proteins not only interact with the membrane surface, but penetrate through the interfacial region and reach the hydrocarbon interior, which is consistent with published experimental studies.
format Text
id pubmed-1934363
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-19343632007-07-28 The role of hydrophobic interactions in positioning of peripheral proteins in membranes Lomize, Andrei L Pogozheva, Irina D Lomize, Mikhail A Mosberg, Henry I BMC Struct Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) structures of numerous peripheral membrane proteins have been determined. Biological activity, stability, and conformations of these proteins depend on their spatial positions with respect to the lipid bilayer. However, these positions are usually undetermined. RESULTS: We report the first large-scale computational study of monotopic/peripheral proteins with known 3D structures. The optimal translational and rotational positions of 476 proteins are determined by minimizing energy of protein transfer from water to the lipid bilayer, which is approximated by a hydrocarbon slab with a decadiene-like polarity and interfacial regions characterized by water-permeation profiles. Predicted membrane-binding sites, protein tilt angles and membrane penetration depths are consistent with spin-labeling, chemical modification, fluorescence, NMR, mutagenesis, and other experimental studies of 53 peripheral proteins and peptides. Experimental membrane binding affinities of peripheral proteins were reproduced in cases that did not involve a helix-coil transition, specific binding of lipids, or a predominantly electrostatic association. Coordinates of all examined peripheral proteins and peptides with the calculated hydrophobic membrane boundaries, subcellular localization, topology, structural classification, and experimental references are available through the Orientations of Proteins in Membranes (OPM) database. CONCLUSION: Positions of diverse peripheral proteins and peptides in the lipid bilayer can be accurately predicted using their 3D structures that represent a proper membrane-bound conformation and oligomeric state, and have membrane binding elements present. The success of the implicit solvation model suggests that hydrophobic interactions are usually sufficient to determine the spatial position of a protein in the membrane, even when electrostatic interactions or specific binding of lipids are substantial. Our results demonstrate that most peripheral proteins not only interact with the membrane surface, but penetrate through the interfacial region and reach the hydrocarbon interior, which is consistent with published experimental studies. BioMed Central 2007-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC1934363/ /pubmed/17603894 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6807-7-44 Text en Copyright © 2007 Lomize et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lomize, Andrei L
Pogozheva, Irina D
Lomize, Mikhail A
Mosberg, Henry I
The role of hydrophobic interactions in positioning of peripheral proteins in membranes
title The role of hydrophobic interactions in positioning of peripheral proteins in membranes
title_full The role of hydrophobic interactions in positioning of peripheral proteins in membranes
title_fullStr The role of hydrophobic interactions in positioning of peripheral proteins in membranes
title_full_unstemmed The role of hydrophobic interactions in positioning of peripheral proteins in membranes
title_short The role of hydrophobic interactions in positioning of peripheral proteins in membranes
title_sort role of hydrophobic interactions in positioning of peripheral proteins in membranes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1934363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17603894
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6807-7-44
work_keys_str_mv AT lomizeandreil theroleofhydrophobicinteractionsinpositioningofperipheralproteinsinmembranes
AT pogozhevairinad theroleofhydrophobicinteractionsinpositioningofperipheralproteinsinmembranes
AT lomizemikhaila theroleofhydrophobicinteractionsinpositioningofperipheralproteinsinmembranes
AT mosberghenryi theroleofhydrophobicinteractionsinpositioningofperipheralproteinsinmembranes
AT lomizeandreil roleofhydrophobicinteractionsinpositioningofperipheralproteinsinmembranes
AT pogozhevairinad roleofhydrophobicinteractionsinpositioningofperipheralproteinsinmembranes
AT lomizemikhaila roleofhydrophobicinteractionsinpositioningofperipheralproteinsinmembranes
AT mosberghenryi roleofhydrophobicinteractionsinpositioningofperipheralproteinsinmembranes