Cargando…
Telecare motivational interviewing for diabetes patient education and support: a randomised controlled trial based in primary care comparing nurse and peer supporter delivery
BACKGROUND: There is increasing interest in developing peer-led and 'expert patient'-type interventions, particularly to meet the support and informational needs of those with long term conditions, leading to improved clinical outcomes, and pressure relief on mainstream health services. Th...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1934921/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17598895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-8-18 |
_version_ | 1782134356075085824 |
---|---|
author | Dale, Jeremy Caramlau, Isabela Docherty, Andrea Sturt, Jackie Hearnshaw, Hilary |
author_facet | Dale, Jeremy Caramlau, Isabela Docherty, Andrea Sturt, Jackie Hearnshaw, Hilary |
author_sort | Dale, Jeremy |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is increasing interest in developing peer-led and 'expert patient'-type interventions, particularly to meet the support and informational needs of those with long term conditions, leading to improved clinical outcomes, and pressure relief on mainstream health services. There is also increasing interest in telephone support, due to its greater accessibility and potential availability than face to face provided support. The evidence base for peer telephone interventions is relatively weak, although such services are widely available as support lines provided by user groups and other charitable services. METHODS/DESIGN: In a 3-arm RCT, participants are allocated to either an intervention group with Telecare service provided by a Diabetes Specialist Nurse (DSN), an intervention group with service provided by a peer supporter (also living with diabetes), or a control group receiving routine care only. All supporters underwent a 2-day training in motivational interviewing, empowerment and active listening skills to provide telephone support over a period of up to 6 months to adults with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes who had been recommended a change in diabetes management (i.e. medication and/or lifestyle changes) by their general practitioner (GP). The primary outcome is self-efficacy; secondary outcomes include HbA1c, total and HDL cholesterol, blood pressure, body mass index, and adherence to treatment. 375 participants (125 in each arm) were sought from GP practices across West Midlands, to detect a difference in self-efficacy scores with an effect size of 0.35, 80% power, and 5% significance level. Adults living with type 2 diabetes, with an HbA1c > 8% and not taking insulin were initially eligible. A protocol change 10 months into the recruitment resulted in a change of eligibility by reducing HbA1c to > 7.4%. Several qualitative studies are being conducted alongside the main RCT to describe patient, telecare supporter and practice nurse experience of the trial. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS OF THE RESEARCH: With its focus on self-management and telephone peer support, the intervention being trialled has the potential to support improved self-efficacy and patient experience, improved clinical outcomes and a reduction in diabetes-related complications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials, ISRCTN63151946 |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1934921 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-19349212007-07-31 Telecare motivational interviewing for diabetes patient education and support: a randomised controlled trial based in primary care comparing nurse and peer supporter delivery Dale, Jeremy Caramlau, Isabela Docherty, Andrea Sturt, Jackie Hearnshaw, Hilary Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: There is increasing interest in developing peer-led and 'expert patient'-type interventions, particularly to meet the support and informational needs of those with long term conditions, leading to improved clinical outcomes, and pressure relief on mainstream health services. There is also increasing interest in telephone support, due to its greater accessibility and potential availability than face to face provided support. The evidence base for peer telephone interventions is relatively weak, although such services are widely available as support lines provided by user groups and other charitable services. METHODS/DESIGN: In a 3-arm RCT, participants are allocated to either an intervention group with Telecare service provided by a Diabetes Specialist Nurse (DSN), an intervention group with service provided by a peer supporter (also living with diabetes), or a control group receiving routine care only. All supporters underwent a 2-day training in motivational interviewing, empowerment and active listening skills to provide telephone support over a period of up to 6 months to adults with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes who had been recommended a change in diabetes management (i.e. medication and/or lifestyle changes) by their general practitioner (GP). The primary outcome is self-efficacy; secondary outcomes include HbA1c, total and HDL cholesterol, blood pressure, body mass index, and adherence to treatment. 375 participants (125 in each arm) were sought from GP practices across West Midlands, to detect a difference in self-efficacy scores with an effect size of 0.35, 80% power, and 5% significance level. Adults living with type 2 diabetes, with an HbA1c > 8% and not taking insulin were initially eligible. A protocol change 10 months into the recruitment resulted in a change of eligibility by reducing HbA1c to > 7.4%. Several qualitative studies are being conducted alongside the main RCT to describe patient, telecare supporter and practice nurse experience of the trial. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS OF THE RESEARCH: With its focus on self-management and telephone peer support, the intervention being trialled has the potential to support improved self-efficacy and patient experience, improved clinical outcomes and a reduction in diabetes-related complications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials, ISRCTN63151946 BioMed Central 2007-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC1934921/ /pubmed/17598895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-8-18 Text en Copyright © 2007 Dale et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Dale, Jeremy Caramlau, Isabela Docherty, Andrea Sturt, Jackie Hearnshaw, Hilary Telecare motivational interviewing for diabetes patient education and support: a randomised controlled trial based in primary care comparing nurse and peer supporter delivery |
title | Telecare motivational interviewing for diabetes patient education and support: a randomised controlled trial based in primary care comparing nurse and peer supporter delivery |
title_full | Telecare motivational interviewing for diabetes patient education and support: a randomised controlled trial based in primary care comparing nurse and peer supporter delivery |
title_fullStr | Telecare motivational interviewing for diabetes patient education and support: a randomised controlled trial based in primary care comparing nurse and peer supporter delivery |
title_full_unstemmed | Telecare motivational interviewing for diabetes patient education and support: a randomised controlled trial based in primary care comparing nurse and peer supporter delivery |
title_short | Telecare motivational interviewing for diabetes patient education and support: a randomised controlled trial based in primary care comparing nurse and peer supporter delivery |
title_sort | telecare motivational interviewing for diabetes patient education and support: a randomised controlled trial based in primary care comparing nurse and peer supporter delivery |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1934921/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17598895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-8-18 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dalejeremy telecaremotivationalinterviewingfordiabetespatienteducationandsupportarandomisedcontrolledtrialbasedinprimarycarecomparingnurseandpeersupporterdelivery AT caramlauisabela telecaremotivationalinterviewingfordiabetespatienteducationandsupportarandomisedcontrolledtrialbasedinprimarycarecomparingnurseandpeersupporterdelivery AT dochertyandrea telecaremotivationalinterviewingfordiabetespatienteducationandsupportarandomisedcontrolledtrialbasedinprimarycarecomparingnurseandpeersupporterdelivery AT sturtjackie telecaremotivationalinterviewingfordiabetespatienteducationandsupportarandomisedcontrolledtrialbasedinprimarycarecomparingnurseandpeersupporterdelivery AT hearnshawhilary telecaremotivationalinterviewingfordiabetespatienteducationandsupportarandomisedcontrolledtrialbasedinprimarycarecomparingnurseandpeersupporterdelivery |