Cargando…

Nearest-neighbor non-additivity versus long-range non-additivity in TATA-box structure and its implications for TBP-binding mechanism

TBP recognizes its target sites, TATA boxes, by recognizing their sequence-dependent structure and flexibility. Studying this mode of TATA-box recognition, termed ‘indirect readout’, is important for elucidating the binding mechanism in this system, as well as for developing methods to locate new bi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Faiger, Hana, Ivanchenko, Marina, Haran, Tali E.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1935006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17576671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm451
_version_ 1782134363247345664
author Faiger, Hana
Ivanchenko, Marina
Haran, Tali E.
author_facet Faiger, Hana
Ivanchenko, Marina
Haran, Tali E.
author_sort Faiger, Hana
collection PubMed
description TBP recognizes its target sites, TATA boxes, by recognizing their sequence-dependent structure and flexibility. Studying this mode of TATA-box recognition, termed ‘indirect readout’, is important for elucidating the binding mechanism in this system, as well as for developing methods to locate new binding sites in genomic DNA. We determined the binding stability and TBP-induced TATA-box bending for consensus-like TATA boxes. In addition, we calculated the individual information score of all studied sequences. We show that various non-additive effects exist in TATA boxes, dependent on their structural properties. By several criterions, we divide TATA boxes to two main groups. The first group contains sequences with 3–4 consecutive adenines. Sequences in this group have a rigid context-independent cooperative structure, best described by a nearest-neighbor non-additive model. Sequences in the second group have a flexible, context-dependent conformation, which cannot be described by an additive model or by a nearest-neighbor non-additive model. Classifying TATA boxes by these and other structural rules clarifies the different recognition pathways and binding mechanisms used by TBP upon binding to different TATA boxes. We discuss the structural and evolutionary sources of the difficulties in predicting new binding sites by probabilistic weight-matrix methods for proteins in which indirect readout is dominant.
format Text
id pubmed-1935006
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-19350062007-08-07 Nearest-neighbor non-additivity versus long-range non-additivity in TATA-box structure and its implications for TBP-binding mechanism Faiger, Hana Ivanchenko, Marina Haran, Tali E. Nucleic Acids Res Molecular Biology TBP recognizes its target sites, TATA boxes, by recognizing their sequence-dependent structure and flexibility. Studying this mode of TATA-box recognition, termed ‘indirect readout’, is important for elucidating the binding mechanism in this system, as well as for developing methods to locate new binding sites in genomic DNA. We determined the binding stability and TBP-induced TATA-box bending for consensus-like TATA boxes. In addition, we calculated the individual information score of all studied sequences. We show that various non-additive effects exist in TATA boxes, dependent on their structural properties. By several criterions, we divide TATA boxes to two main groups. The first group contains sequences with 3–4 consecutive adenines. Sequences in this group have a rigid context-independent cooperative structure, best described by a nearest-neighbor non-additive model. Sequences in the second group have a flexible, context-dependent conformation, which cannot be described by an additive model or by a nearest-neighbor non-additive model. Classifying TATA boxes by these and other structural rules clarifies the different recognition pathways and binding mechanisms used by TBP upon binding to different TATA boxes. We discuss the structural and evolutionary sources of the difficulties in predicting new binding sites by probabilistic weight-matrix methods for proteins in which indirect readout is dominant. Oxford University Press 2007-07 2007-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC1935006/ /pubmed/17576671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm451 Text en © 2007 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Molecular Biology
Faiger, Hana
Ivanchenko, Marina
Haran, Tali E.
Nearest-neighbor non-additivity versus long-range non-additivity in TATA-box structure and its implications for TBP-binding mechanism
title Nearest-neighbor non-additivity versus long-range non-additivity in TATA-box structure and its implications for TBP-binding mechanism
title_full Nearest-neighbor non-additivity versus long-range non-additivity in TATA-box structure and its implications for TBP-binding mechanism
title_fullStr Nearest-neighbor non-additivity versus long-range non-additivity in TATA-box structure and its implications for TBP-binding mechanism
title_full_unstemmed Nearest-neighbor non-additivity versus long-range non-additivity in TATA-box structure and its implications for TBP-binding mechanism
title_short Nearest-neighbor non-additivity versus long-range non-additivity in TATA-box structure and its implications for TBP-binding mechanism
title_sort nearest-neighbor non-additivity versus long-range non-additivity in tata-box structure and its implications for tbp-binding mechanism
topic Molecular Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1935006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17576671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm451
work_keys_str_mv AT faigerhana nearestneighbornonadditivityversuslongrangenonadditivityintataboxstructureanditsimplicationsfortbpbindingmechanism
AT ivanchenkomarina nearestneighbornonadditivityversuslongrangenonadditivityintataboxstructureanditsimplicationsfortbpbindingmechanism
AT harantalie nearestneighbornonadditivityversuslongrangenonadditivityintataboxstructureanditsimplicationsfortbpbindingmechanism