Cargando…
A comparative study of the inhibitory effects of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist following administration as a recombinant protein or by gene transfer
Anakinra, the recombinant form of IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra), has been approved for clinical use in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis as the drug Kineret™, but it must be administered daily by subcutaneous injection. Gene transfer may offer a more effective means of delivery. In this stud...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2003
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC193732/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12932294 |
_version_ | 1782120914094129152 |
---|---|
author | Gouze, Jean-Noel Gouze, Elvire Palmer, Glyn D Liew, Victor S Pascher, Arnulf Betz, Oliver B Thornhill, Thomas S Evans, Christopher H Grodzinsky, Alan J Ghivizzani, Steven C |
author_facet | Gouze, Jean-Noel Gouze, Elvire Palmer, Glyn D Liew, Victor S Pascher, Arnulf Betz, Oliver B Thornhill, Thomas S Evans, Christopher H Grodzinsky, Alan J Ghivizzani, Steven C |
author_sort | Gouze, Jean-Noel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Anakinra, the recombinant form of IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra), has been approved for clinical use in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis as the drug Kineret™, but it must be administered daily by subcutaneous injection. Gene transfer may offer a more effective means of delivery. In this study, using prostaglandin E(2 )production as a measure of stimulation, we quantitatively compared the ability of anakinra, as well as that of IL-1Ra delivered by gene transfer, to inhibit the biologic actions of IL-1β. Human synovial fibroblast cultures were incubated with a range of doses of anakinra or HIG-82 cells genetically modified to constitutively express IL-1Ra. The cultures were then challenged with recombinant human IL-1β either simultaneously with addition of the source of IL-1Ra or 24 hours later. In a similar manner, the potencies of the two sources of IL-1Ra were compared when human synovial fibroblasts were challenged with IL-1β produced constitutively by genetically modified cells. No significant difference in inhibitory activity was observed between recombinant protein and IL-1Ra provided by the genetically modified cells, under static culture conditions, even following incubation for 4 days. However, under culture conditions that provided progressive dilution of the culture media, striking differences between these methods of protein delivery became readily apparent. Constitutive synthesis of IL-1Ra by the genetically modified cells provided sustained or increased protection from IL-1 stimulation over time, whereas the recombinant protein became progressively less effective. This was particularly evident under conditions of continuous IL-1β synthesis. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-193732 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2003 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-1937322003-09-15 A comparative study of the inhibitory effects of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist following administration as a recombinant protein or by gene transfer Gouze, Jean-Noel Gouze, Elvire Palmer, Glyn D Liew, Victor S Pascher, Arnulf Betz, Oliver B Thornhill, Thomas S Evans, Christopher H Grodzinsky, Alan J Ghivizzani, Steven C Arthritis Res Ther Research Article Anakinra, the recombinant form of IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra), has been approved for clinical use in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis as the drug Kineret™, but it must be administered daily by subcutaneous injection. Gene transfer may offer a more effective means of delivery. In this study, using prostaglandin E(2 )production as a measure of stimulation, we quantitatively compared the ability of anakinra, as well as that of IL-1Ra delivered by gene transfer, to inhibit the biologic actions of IL-1β. Human synovial fibroblast cultures were incubated with a range of doses of anakinra or HIG-82 cells genetically modified to constitutively express IL-1Ra. The cultures were then challenged with recombinant human IL-1β either simultaneously with addition of the source of IL-1Ra or 24 hours later. In a similar manner, the potencies of the two sources of IL-1Ra were compared when human synovial fibroblasts were challenged with IL-1β produced constitutively by genetically modified cells. No significant difference in inhibitory activity was observed between recombinant protein and IL-1Ra provided by the genetically modified cells, under static culture conditions, even following incubation for 4 days. However, under culture conditions that provided progressive dilution of the culture media, striking differences between these methods of protein delivery became readily apparent. Constitutive synthesis of IL-1Ra by the genetically modified cells provided sustained or increased protection from IL-1 stimulation over time, whereas the recombinant protein became progressively less effective. This was particularly evident under conditions of continuous IL-1β synthesis. BioMed Central 2003 2003-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC193732/ /pubmed/12932294 Text en Copyright © 2003 Gouze et al., licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gouze, Jean-Noel Gouze, Elvire Palmer, Glyn D Liew, Victor S Pascher, Arnulf Betz, Oliver B Thornhill, Thomas S Evans, Christopher H Grodzinsky, Alan J Ghivizzani, Steven C A comparative study of the inhibitory effects of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist following administration as a recombinant protein or by gene transfer |
title | A comparative study of the inhibitory effects of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist following administration as a recombinant protein or by gene transfer |
title_full | A comparative study of the inhibitory effects of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist following administration as a recombinant protein or by gene transfer |
title_fullStr | A comparative study of the inhibitory effects of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist following administration as a recombinant protein or by gene transfer |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative study of the inhibitory effects of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist following administration as a recombinant protein or by gene transfer |
title_short | A comparative study of the inhibitory effects of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist following administration as a recombinant protein or by gene transfer |
title_sort | comparative study of the inhibitory effects of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist following administration as a recombinant protein or by gene transfer |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC193732/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12932294 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gouzejeannoel acomparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectsofinterleukin1receptorantagonistfollowingadministrationasarecombinantproteinorbygenetransfer AT gouzeelvire acomparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectsofinterleukin1receptorantagonistfollowingadministrationasarecombinantproteinorbygenetransfer AT palmerglynd acomparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectsofinterleukin1receptorantagonistfollowingadministrationasarecombinantproteinorbygenetransfer AT liewvictors acomparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectsofinterleukin1receptorantagonistfollowingadministrationasarecombinantproteinorbygenetransfer AT pascherarnulf acomparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectsofinterleukin1receptorantagonistfollowingadministrationasarecombinantproteinorbygenetransfer AT betzoliverb acomparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectsofinterleukin1receptorantagonistfollowingadministrationasarecombinantproteinorbygenetransfer AT thornhillthomass acomparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectsofinterleukin1receptorantagonistfollowingadministrationasarecombinantproteinorbygenetransfer AT evanschristopherh acomparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectsofinterleukin1receptorantagonistfollowingadministrationasarecombinantproteinorbygenetransfer AT grodzinskyalanj acomparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectsofinterleukin1receptorantagonistfollowingadministrationasarecombinantproteinorbygenetransfer AT ghivizzanistevenc acomparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectsofinterleukin1receptorantagonistfollowingadministrationasarecombinantproteinorbygenetransfer AT gouzejeannoel comparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectsofinterleukin1receptorantagonistfollowingadministrationasarecombinantproteinorbygenetransfer AT gouzeelvire comparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectsofinterleukin1receptorantagonistfollowingadministrationasarecombinantproteinorbygenetransfer AT palmerglynd comparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectsofinterleukin1receptorantagonistfollowingadministrationasarecombinantproteinorbygenetransfer AT liewvictors comparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectsofinterleukin1receptorantagonistfollowingadministrationasarecombinantproteinorbygenetransfer AT pascherarnulf comparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectsofinterleukin1receptorantagonistfollowingadministrationasarecombinantproteinorbygenetransfer AT betzoliverb comparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectsofinterleukin1receptorantagonistfollowingadministrationasarecombinantproteinorbygenetransfer AT thornhillthomass comparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectsofinterleukin1receptorantagonistfollowingadministrationasarecombinantproteinorbygenetransfer AT evanschristopherh comparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectsofinterleukin1receptorantagonistfollowingadministrationasarecombinantproteinorbygenetransfer AT grodzinskyalanj comparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectsofinterleukin1receptorantagonistfollowingadministrationasarecombinantproteinorbygenetransfer AT ghivizzanistevenc comparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectsofinterleukin1receptorantagonistfollowingadministrationasarecombinantproteinorbygenetransfer |