Cargando…

A comparative study of the inhibitory effects of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist following administration as a recombinant protein or by gene transfer

Anakinra, the recombinant form of IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra), has been approved for clinical use in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis as the drug Kineret™, but it must be administered daily by subcutaneous injection. Gene transfer may offer a more effective means of delivery. In this stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gouze, Jean-Noel, Gouze, Elvire, Palmer, Glyn D, Liew, Victor S, Pascher, Arnulf, Betz, Oliver B, Thornhill, Thomas S, Evans, Christopher H, Grodzinsky, Alan J, Ghivizzani, Steven C
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC193732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12932294
_version_ 1782120914094129152
author Gouze, Jean-Noel
Gouze, Elvire
Palmer, Glyn D
Liew, Victor S
Pascher, Arnulf
Betz, Oliver B
Thornhill, Thomas S
Evans, Christopher H
Grodzinsky, Alan J
Ghivizzani, Steven C
author_facet Gouze, Jean-Noel
Gouze, Elvire
Palmer, Glyn D
Liew, Victor S
Pascher, Arnulf
Betz, Oliver B
Thornhill, Thomas S
Evans, Christopher H
Grodzinsky, Alan J
Ghivizzani, Steven C
author_sort Gouze, Jean-Noel
collection PubMed
description Anakinra, the recombinant form of IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra), has been approved for clinical use in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis as the drug Kineret™, but it must be administered daily by subcutaneous injection. Gene transfer may offer a more effective means of delivery. In this study, using prostaglandin E(2 )production as a measure of stimulation, we quantitatively compared the ability of anakinra, as well as that of IL-1Ra delivered by gene transfer, to inhibit the biologic actions of IL-1β. Human synovial fibroblast cultures were incubated with a range of doses of anakinra or HIG-82 cells genetically modified to constitutively express IL-1Ra. The cultures were then challenged with recombinant human IL-1β either simultaneously with addition of the source of IL-1Ra or 24 hours later. In a similar manner, the potencies of the two sources of IL-1Ra were compared when human synovial fibroblasts were challenged with IL-1β produced constitutively by genetically modified cells. No significant difference in inhibitory activity was observed between recombinant protein and IL-1Ra provided by the genetically modified cells, under static culture conditions, even following incubation for 4 days. However, under culture conditions that provided progressive dilution of the culture media, striking differences between these methods of protein delivery became readily apparent. Constitutive synthesis of IL-1Ra by the genetically modified cells provided sustained or increased protection from IL-1 stimulation over time, whereas the recombinant protein became progressively less effective. This was particularly evident under conditions of continuous IL-1β synthesis.
format Text
id pubmed-193732
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2003
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-1937322003-09-15 A comparative study of the inhibitory effects of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist following administration as a recombinant protein or by gene transfer Gouze, Jean-Noel Gouze, Elvire Palmer, Glyn D Liew, Victor S Pascher, Arnulf Betz, Oliver B Thornhill, Thomas S Evans, Christopher H Grodzinsky, Alan J Ghivizzani, Steven C Arthritis Res Ther Research Article Anakinra, the recombinant form of IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra), has been approved for clinical use in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis as the drug Kineret™, but it must be administered daily by subcutaneous injection. Gene transfer may offer a more effective means of delivery. In this study, using prostaglandin E(2 )production as a measure of stimulation, we quantitatively compared the ability of anakinra, as well as that of IL-1Ra delivered by gene transfer, to inhibit the biologic actions of IL-1β. Human synovial fibroblast cultures were incubated with a range of doses of anakinra or HIG-82 cells genetically modified to constitutively express IL-1Ra. The cultures were then challenged with recombinant human IL-1β either simultaneously with addition of the source of IL-1Ra or 24 hours later. In a similar manner, the potencies of the two sources of IL-1Ra were compared when human synovial fibroblasts were challenged with IL-1β produced constitutively by genetically modified cells. No significant difference in inhibitory activity was observed between recombinant protein and IL-1Ra provided by the genetically modified cells, under static culture conditions, even following incubation for 4 days. However, under culture conditions that provided progressive dilution of the culture media, striking differences between these methods of protein delivery became readily apparent. Constitutive synthesis of IL-1Ra by the genetically modified cells provided sustained or increased protection from IL-1 stimulation over time, whereas the recombinant protein became progressively less effective. This was particularly evident under conditions of continuous IL-1β synthesis. BioMed Central 2003 2003-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC193732/ /pubmed/12932294 Text en Copyright © 2003 Gouze et al., licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gouze, Jean-Noel
Gouze, Elvire
Palmer, Glyn D
Liew, Victor S
Pascher, Arnulf
Betz, Oliver B
Thornhill, Thomas S
Evans, Christopher H
Grodzinsky, Alan J
Ghivizzani, Steven C
A comparative study of the inhibitory effects of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist following administration as a recombinant protein or by gene transfer
title A comparative study of the inhibitory effects of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist following administration as a recombinant protein or by gene transfer
title_full A comparative study of the inhibitory effects of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist following administration as a recombinant protein or by gene transfer
title_fullStr A comparative study of the inhibitory effects of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist following administration as a recombinant protein or by gene transfer
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of the inhibitory effects of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist following administration as a recombinant protein or by gene transfer
title_short A comparative study of the inhibitory effects of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist following administration as a recombinant protein or by gene transfer
title_sort comparative study of the inhibitory effects of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist following administration as a recombinant protein or by gene transfer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC193732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12932294
work_keys_str_mv AT gouzejeannoel acomparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectsofinterleukin1receptorantagonistfollowingadministrationasarecombinantproteinorbygenetransfer
AT gouzeelvire acomparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectsofinterleukin1receptorantagonistfollowingadministrationasarecombinantproteinorbygenetransfer
AT palmerglynd acomparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectsofinterleukin1receptorantagonistfollowingadministrationasarecombinantproteinorbygenetransfer
AT liewvictors acomparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectsofinterleukin1receptorantagonistfollowingadministrationasarecombinantproteinorbygenetransfer
AT pascherarnulf acomparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectsofinterleukin1receptorantagonistfollowingadministrationasarecombinantproteinorbygenetransfer
AT betzoliverb acomparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectsofinterleukin1receptorantagonistfollowingadministrationasarecombinantproteinorbygenetransfer
AT thornhillthomass acomparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectsofinterleukin1receptorantagonistfollowingadministrationasarecombinantproteinorbygenetransfer
AT evanschristopherh acomparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectsofinterleukin1receptorantagonistfollowingadministrationasarecombinantproteinorbygenetransfer
AT grodzinskyalanj acomparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectsofinterleukin1receptorantagonistfollowingadministrationasarecombinantproteinorbygenetransfer
AT ghivizzanistevenc acomparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectsofinterleukin1receptorantagonistfollowingadministrationasarecombinantproteinorbygenetransfer
AT gouzejeannoel comparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectsofinterleukin1receptorantagonistfollowingadministrationasarecombinantproteinorbygenetransfer
AT gouzeelvire comparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectsofinterleukin1receptorantagonistfollowingadministrationasarecombinantproteinorbygenetransfer
AT palmerglynd comparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectsofinterleukin1receptorantagonistfollowingadministrationasarecombinantproteinorbygenetransfer
AT liewvictors comparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectsofinterleukin1receptorantagonistfollowingadministrationasarecombinantproteinorbygenetransfer
AT pascherarnulf comparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectsofinterleukin1receptorantagonistfollowingadministrationasarecombinantproteinorbygenetransfer
AT betzoliverb comparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectsofinterleukin1receptorantagonistfollowingadministrationasarecombinantproteinorbygenetransfer
AT thornhillthomass comparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectsofinterleukin1receptorantagonistfollowingadministrationasarecombinantproteinorbygenetransfer
AT evanschristopherh comparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectsofinterleukin1receptorantagonistfollowingadministrationasarecombinantproteinorbygenetransfer
AT grodzinskyalanj comparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectsofinterleukin1receptorantagonistfollowingadministrationasarecombinantproteinorbygenetransfer
AT ghivizzanistevenc comparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectsofinterleukin1receptorantagonistfollowingadministrationasarecombinantproteinorbygenetransfer