Cargando…

Retaining women in a prenatal care randomized controlled trial in Canada: implications for program planning

BACKGROUND: Challenges to retention in prenatal care seem to exist under both universal systems of care, as in Canada, and non-universal systems of care, as in the United States. However, among populations being served by a system of publicly funded health care, the barriers are less well understood...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tough, Suzanne C, Siever, Jodi E, Johnston, David W
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1939989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17617914
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-7-148
_version_ 1782134422300000256
author Tough, Suzanne C
Siever, Jodi E
Johnston, David W
author_facet Tough, Suzanne C
Siever, Jodi E
Johnston, David W
author_sort Tough, Suzanne C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Challenges to retention in prenatal care seem to exist under both universal systems of care, as in Canada, and non-universal systems of care, as in the United States. However, among populations being served by a system of publicly funded health care, the barriers are less well understood and universal uptake of prenatal services has not been realized. Determining the characteristics of women who dropped out of a prenatal care randomized controlled trial can help identify those who may need alternate retention and service approaches. METHODS: In this study, pregnant women were randomized to: a) current standard of care; b) 'a' plus nursing support; or c) 'b' plus a paraprofessional home visitor. 16% of 2,015 women did not complete all three telephone interviews (197 dropped out and 124 became unreachable). Responders were compared to non-responders on demographics, lifestyle, psychosocial factors, and life events using chi-squared tests. Logistic regression models were constructed using stepwise logistic regression to determine the probability of not completing the prenatal program. RESULTS: Completion rates did not differ by intervention. In comparison to responders, non-responders were more likely to be younger, less educated, have lower incomes, smoke, have low social support, have a history of depression, and have separated or divorced parents (all p < 0.05). Unreachable women were more likely to be single, use drugs, report distress and adverse life events (all p < 0.05). Non-Caucasian women were more likely to drop out (p = 0.002). Logistic regression modeling indicated that independent key risk factors for dropping out were: less than high school education, separated or divorced parents, lower social support, and being non-Caucasian. Pregnant women who were single/separated/divorced, less than 25 years old, had less than high school education, earned less than $40,000 in annual household income, and/or smoked had greater odds of becoming unreachable at some point during pregnancy and not completing the study. CONCLUSION: Women at risk due to lifestyle and challenging circumstances were difficult to retain in a prenatal care study, regardless of the intervention. For women with complex health, lifestyle and social issues, lack of retention may reflect incongruence between their needs and the program. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN64070727
format Text
id pubmed-1939989
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-19399892007-08-07 Retaining women in a prenatal care randomized controlled trial in Canada: implications for program planning Tough, Suzanne C Siever, Jodi E Johnston, David W BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Challenges to retention in prenatal care seem to exist under both universal systems of care, as in Canada, and non-universal systems of care, as in the United States. However, among populations being served by a system of publicly funded health care, the barriers are less well understood and universal uptake of prenatal services has not been realized. Determining the characteristics of women who dropped out of a prenatal care randomized controlled trial can help identify those who may need alternate retention and service approaches. METHODS: In this study, pregnant women were randomized to: a) current standard of care; b) 'a' plus nursing support; or c) 'b' plus a paraprofessional home visitor. 16% of 2,015 women did not complete all three telephone interviews (197 dropped out and 124 became unreachable). Responders were compared to non-responders on demographics, lifestyle, psychosocial factors, and life events using chi-squared tests. Logistic regression models were constructed using stepwise logistic regression to determine the probability of not completing the prenatal program. RESULTS: Completion rates did not differ by intervention. In comparison to responders, non-responders were more likely to be younger, less educated, have lower incomes, smoke, have low social support, have a history of depression, and have separated or divorced parents (all p < 0.05). Unreachable women were more likely to be single, use drugs, report distress and adverse life events (all p < 0.05). Non-Caucasian women were more likely to drop out (p = 0.002). Logistic regression modeling indicated that independent key risk factors for dropping out were: less than high school education, separated or divorced parents, lower social support, and being non-Caucasian. Pregnant women who were single/separated/divorced, less than 25 years old, had less than high school education, earned less than $40,000 in annual household income, and/or smoked had greater odds of becoming unreachable at some point during pregnancy and not completing the study. CONCLUSION: Women at risk due to lifestyle and challenging circumstances were difficult to retain in a prenatal care study, regardless of the intervention. For women with complex health, lifestyle and social issues, lack of retention may reflect incongruence between their needs and the program. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN64070727 BioMed Central 2007-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC1939989/ /pubmed/17617914 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-7-148 Text en Copyright © 2007 Tough et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tough, Suzanne C
Siever, Jodi E
Johnston, David W
Retaining women in a prenatal care randomized controlled trial in Canada: implications for program planning
title Retaining women in a prenatal care randomized controlled trial in Canada: implications for program planning
title_full Retaining women in a prenatal care randomized controlled trial in Canada: implications for program planning
title_fullStr Retaining women in a prenatal care randomized controlled trial in Canada: implications for program planning
title_full_unstemmed Retaining women in a prenatal care randomized controlled trial in Canada: implications for program planning
title_short Retaining women in a prenatal care randomized controlled trial in Canada: implications for program planning
title_sort retaining women in a prenatal care randomized controlled trial in canada: implications for program planning
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1939989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17617914
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-7-148
work_keys_str_mv AT toughsuzannec retainingwomeninaprenatalcarerandomizedcontrolledtrialincanadaimplicationsforprogramplanning
AT sieverjodie retainingwomeninaprenatalcarerandomizedcontrolledtrialincanadaimplicationsforprogramplanning
AT johnstondavidw retainingwomeninaprenatalcarerandomizedcontrolledtrialincanadaimplicationsforprogramplanning