Cargando…

Comparison of artificial neural network analysis with other multimarker methods for detecting genetic association

BACKGROUND: Debate remains as to the optimal method for utilising genotype data obtained from multiple markers in case-control association studies. I and colleagues have previously described a method of association analysis using artificial neural networks (ANNs), whose performance compared favourab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Curtis, David
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1940019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17640352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-8-49
_version_ 1782134429569777664
author Curtis, David
author_facet Curtis, David
author_sort Curtis, David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Debate remains as to the optimal method for utilising genotype data obtained from multiple markers in case-control association studies. I and colleagues have previously described a method of association analysis using artificial neural networks (ANNs), whose performance compared favourably to single-marker methods. Here, the perfomance of ANN analysis is compared with other multi-marker methods, comprising different haplotype-based analyses and locus-based analyses. RESULTS: Of several methods studied and applied to simulated SNP datasets, heterogeneity testing of estimated haplotype frequencies using asymptotic p values rather than permutation testing had the lowest power of the methods studied and ANN analysis had the highest power. The difference in power to detect association between these two methods was statistically significant (p = 0.001) but other comparisons between methods were not significant. The raw t statistic obtained from ANN analysis correlated highly with the empirical statistical significance obtained from permutation testing of the ANN results and with the p value obtained from the heterogeneity test. CONCLUSION: Although ANN analysis was more powerful than the standard haplotype-based test it is unlikely to be taken up widely. The permutation testing necessary to obtain a valid p value makes it slow to perform and it is not underpinned by a theoretical model relating marker genotypes to disease phenotype. Nevertheless, the superior performance of this method does imply that the widely-used haplotype-based methods for detecting association with multiple markers are not optimal and efforts could be made to improve upon them. The fact that the t statistic obtained from ANN analysis is highly correlated with the statistical significance does suggest a possibility to use ANN analysis in situations where large numbers of markers have been genotyped, since the t value could be used as a proxy for the p value in preliminary analyses.
format Text
id pubmed-1940019
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-19400192007-08-07 Comparison of artificial neural network analysis with other multimarker methods for detecting genetic association Curtis, David BMC Genet Research Article BACKGROUND: Debate remains as to the optimal method for utilising genotype data obtained from multiple markers in case-control association studies. I and colleagues have previously described a method of association analysis using artificial neural networks (ANNs), whose performance compared favourably to single-marker methods. Here, the perfomance of ANN analysis is compared with other multi-marker methods, comprising different haplotype-based analyses and locus-based analyses. RESULTS: Of several methods studied and applied to simulated SNP datasets, heterogeneity testing of estimated haplotype frequencies using asymptotic p values rather than permutation testing had the lowest power of the methods studied and ANN analysis had the highest power. The difference in power to detect association between these two methods was statistically significant (p = 0.001) but other comparisons between methods were not significant. The raw t statistic obtained from ANN analysis correlated highly with the empirical statistical significance obtained from permutation testing of the ANN results and with the p value obtained from the heterogeneity test. CONCLUSION: Although ANN analysis was more powerful than the standard haplotype-based test it is unlikely to be taken up widely. The permutation testing necessary to obtain a valid p value makes it slow to perform and it is not underpinned by a theoretical model relating marker genotypes to disease phenotype. Nevertheless, the superior performance of this method does imply that the widely-used haplotype-based methods for detecting association with multiple markers are not optimal and efforts could be made to improve upon them. The fact that the t statistic obtained from ANN analysis is highly correlated with the statistical significance does suggest a possibility to use ANN analysis in situations where large numbers of markers have been genotyped, since the t value could be used as a proxy for the p value in preliminary analyses. BioMed Central 2007-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC1940019/ /pubmed/17640352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-8-49 Text en Copyright © 2007 Curtis; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Curtis, David
Comparison of artificial neural network analysis with other multimarker methods for detecting genetic association
title Comparison of artificial neural network analysis with other multimarker methods for detecting genetic association
title_full Comparison of artificial neural network analysis with other multimarker methods for detecting genetic association
title_fullStr Comparison of artificial neural network analysis with other multimarker methods for detecting genetic association
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of artificial neural network analysis with other multimarker methods for detecting genetic association
title_short Comparison of artificial neural network analysis with other multimarker methods for detecting genetic association
title_sort comparison of artificial neural network analysis with other multimarker methods for detecting genetic association
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1940019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17640352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-8-49
work_keys_str_mv AT curtisdavid comparisonofartificialneuralnetworkanalysiswithothermultimarkermethodsfordetectinggeneticassociation