Cargando…
Theory of genomic imprinting conflict in social insects
BACKGROUND: Genomic imprinting refers to the differential expression of genes inherited from the mother and father (matrigenes and patrigenes). The kinship theory of genomic imprinting treats parent-specific gene expression as products of within-genome conflict. Specifically, matrigenes and patrigen...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2003
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC194663/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12871603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-3-15 |
_version_ | 1782120927918555136 |
---|---|
author | Queller, David C |
author_facet | Queller, David C |
author_sort | Queller, David C |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Genomic imprinting refers to the differential expression of genes inherited from the mother and father (matrigenes and patrigenes). The kinship theory of genomic imprinting treats parent-specific gene expression as products of within-genome conflict. Specifically, matrigenes and patrigenes will be in conflict over treatment of relatives to which they are differently related. Haplodiploid females have many such relatives, and social insects have many contexts in which they affect relatives, so haplodiploid social insects are prime candidates for tests of the kinship theory of imprinting. RESULTS: Matrigenic and patrigenic relatednesses are derived for individuals affected in a variety of contexts, including queen competition, sex ratio, worker laying of male eggs and policing, colony fission, and adoption of new queens. Numerous predictions emerge for what contexts should elicit imprinting, which individuals and tissues will show it, and the direction of imprinting effects. The predictions often vary for different genetic structures (varying queen and mate number) and often contrast with predictions for diploids. CONCLUSION: Because the contexts differ from the normal imprinting case, and because nothing is currently known about imprinting in social insects, these predictions can serve as a strong a priori test of the kinship theory of imprinting. If the predictions are correct, then social insects, which have long served as exemplars of cooperation between individuals, will also be shown to be extraordinary examples of competition within individual genomes. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-194663 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2003 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-1946632003-09-16 Theory of genomic imprinting conflict in social insects Queller, David C BMC Evol Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Genomic imprinting refers to the differential expression of genes inherited from the mother and father (matrigenes and patrigenes). The kinship theory of genomic imprinting treats parent-specific gene expression as products of within-genome conflict. Specifically, matrigenes and patrigenes will be in conflict over treatment of relatives to which they are differently related. Haplodiploid females have many such relatives, and social insects have many contexts in which they affect relatives, so haplodiploid social insects are prime candidates for tests of the kinship theory of imprinting. RESULTS: Matrigenic and patrigenic relatednesses are derived for individuals affected in a variety of contexts, including queen competition, sex ratio, worker laying of male eggs and policing, colony fission, and adoption of new queens. Numerous predictions emerge for what contexts should elicit imprinting, which individuals and tissues will show it, and the direction of imprinting effects. The predictions often vary for different genetic structures (varying queen and mate number) and often contrast with predictions for diploids. CONCLUSION: Because the contexts differ from the normal imprinting case, and because nothing is currently known about imprinting in social insects, these predictions can serve as a strong a priori test of the kinship theory of imprinting. If the predictions are correct, then social insects, which have long served as exemplars of cooperation between individuals, will also be shown to be extraordinary examples of competition within individual genomes. BioMed Central 2003-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC194663/ /pubmed/12871603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-3-15 Text en Copyright © 2003 Queller; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Queller, David C Theory of genomic imprinting conflict in social insects |
title | Theory of genomic imprinting conflict in social insects |
title_full | Theory of genomic imprinting conflict in social insects |
title_fullStr | Theory of genomic imprinting conflict in social insects |
title_full_unstemmed | Theory of genomic imprinting conflict in social insects |
title_short | Theory of genomic imprinting conflict in social insects |
title_sort | theory of genomic imprinting conflict in social insects |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC194663/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12871603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-3-15 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT quellerdavidc theoryofgenomicimprintingconflictinsocialinsects |