Cargando…
Comparison of two normative paediatric gait databases
The availability of age-matched normative data is an essential component of clinical gait analyses. Comparison of normative gait databases is difficult due to the high-dimensionality and temporal nature of the various gait waveforms. The purpose of this study was to provide a method of comparing the...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1947956/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17640348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-5918-6-8 |
_version_ | 1782134491435761664 |
---|---|
author | Chester, Victoria L Tingley, Maureen Biden, Edmund N |
author_facet | Chester, Victoria L Tingley, Maureen Biden, Edmund N |
author_sort | Chester, Victoria L |
collection | PubMed |
description | The availability of age-matched normative data is an essential component of clinical gait analyses. Comparison of normative gait databases is difficult due to the high-dimensionality and temporal nature of the various gait waveforms. The purpose of this study was to provide a method of comparing the sagittal joint angle data between two normative databases. We compared a modern gait database to the historical San Diego database using statistical classifiers developed by Tingley et al. (2002). Gait data were recorded from 60 children aged 1–13 years. A six-camera Vicon 512 motion analysis system and two force plates were utilized to obtain temporal-spatial, kinematic, and kinetic parameters during walking. Differences between the two normative data sets were explored using the classifier index scores, and the mean and covariance structure of the joint angle data from each lab. Significant differences in sagittal angle data between the two databases were identified and attributed to technological advances and data processing techniques (data smoothing, sampling, and joint angle approximations). This work provides a simple method of database comparison using trainable statistical classifiers. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1947956 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-19479562007-08-14 Comparison of two normative paediatric gait databases Chester, Victoria L Tingley, Maureen Biden, Edmund N Dyn Med Review The availability of age-matched normative data is an essential component of clinical gait analyses. Comparison of normative gait databases is difficult due to the high-dimensionality and temporal nature of the various gait waveforms. The purpose of this study was to provide a method of comparing the sagittal joint angle data between two normative databases. We compared a modern gait database to the historical San Diego database using statistical classifiers developed by Tingley et al. (2002). Gait data were recorded from 60 children aged 1–13 years. A six-camera Vicon 512 motion analysis system and two force plates were utilized to obtain temporal-spatial, kinematic, and kinetic parameters during walking. Differences between the two normative data sets were explored using the classifier index scores, and the mean and covariance structure of the joint angle data from each lab. Significant differences in sagittal angle data between the two databases were identified and attributed to technological advances and data processing techniques (data smoothing, sampling, and joint angle approximations). This work provides a simple method of database comparison using trainable statistical classifiers. BioMed Central 2007-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC1947956/ /pubmed/17640348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-5918-6-8 Text en Copyright © 2007 Chester et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Chester, Victoria L Tingley, Maureen Biden, Edmund N Comparison of two normative paediatric gait databases |
title | Comparison of two normative paediatric gait databases |
title_full | Comparison of two normative paediatric gait databases |
title_fullStr | Comparison of two normative paediatric gait databases |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of two normative paediatric gait databases |
title_short | Comparison of two normative paediatric gait databases |
title_sort | comparison of two normative paediatric gait databases |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1947956/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17640348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-5918-6-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chestervictorial comparisonoftwonormativepaediatricgaitdatabases AT tingleymaureen comparisonoftwonormativepaediatricgaitdatabases AT bidenedmundn comparisonoftwonormativepaediatricgaitdatabases |