Cargando…

Comparison of two normative paediatric gait databases

The availability of age-matched normative data is an essential component of clinical gait analyses. Comparison of normative gait databases is difficult due to the high-dimensionality and temporal nature of the various gait waveforms. The purpose of this study was to provide a method of comparing the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chester, Victoria L, Tingley, Maureen, Biden, Edmund N
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1947956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17640348
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-5918-6-8
_version_ 1782134491435761664
author Chester, Victoria L
Tingley, Maureen
Biden, Edmund N
author_facet Chester, Victoria L
Tingley, Maureen
Biden, Edmund N
author_sort Chester, Victoria L
collection PubMed
description The availability of age-matched normative data is an essential component of clinical gait analyses. Comparison of normative gait databases is difficult due to the high-dimensionality and temporal nature of the various gait waveforms. The purpose of this study was to provide a method of comparing the sagittal joint angle data between two normative databases. We compared a modern gait database to the historical San Diego database using statistical classifiers developed by Tingley et al. (2002). Gait data were recorded from 60 children aged 1–13 years. A six-camera Vicon 512 motion analysis system and two force plates were utilized to obtain temporal-spatial, kinematic, and kinetic parameters during walking. Differences between the two normative data sets were explored using the classifier index scores, and the mean and covariance structure of the joint angle data from each lab. Significant differences in sagittal angle data between the two databases were identified and attributed to technological advances and data processing techniques (data smoothing, sampling, and joint angle approximations). This work provides a simple method of database comparison using trainable statistical classifiers.
format Text
id pubmed-1947956
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-19479562007-08-14 Comparison of two normative paediatric gait databases Chester, Victoria L Tingley, Maureen Biden, Edmund N Dyn Med Review The availability of age-matched normative data is an essential component of clinical gait analyses. Comparison of normative gait databases is difficult due to the high-dimensionality and temporal nature of the various gait waveforms. The purpose of this study was to provide a method of comparing the sagittal joint angle data between two normative databases. We compared a modern gait database to the historical San Diego database using statistical classifiers developed by Tingley et al. (2002). Gait data were recorded from 60 children aged 1–13 years. A six-camera Vicon 512 motion analysis system and two force plates were utilized to obtain temporal-spatial, kinematic, and kinetic parameters during walking. Differences between the two normative data sets were explored using the classifier index scores, and the mean and covariance structure of the joint angle data from each lab. Significant differences in sagittal angle data between the two databases were identified and attributed to technological advances and data processing techniques (data smoothing, sampling, and joint angle approximations). This work provides a simple method of database comparison using trainable statistical classifiers. BioMed Central 2007-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC1947956/ /pubmed/17640348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-5918-6-8 Text en Copyright © 2007 Chester et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Chester, Victoria L
Tingley, Maureen
Biden, Edmund N
Comparison of two normative paediatric gait databases
title Comparison of two normative paediatric gait databases
title_full Comparison of two normative paediatric gait databases
title_fullStr Comparison of two normative paediatric gait databases
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two normative paediatric gait databases
title_short Comparison of two normative paediatric gait databases
title_sort comparison of two normative paediatric gait databases
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1947956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17640348
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-5918-6-8
work_keys_str_mv AT chestervictorial comparisonoftwonormativepaediatricgaitdatabases
AT tingleymaureen comparisonoftwonormativepaediatricgaitdatabases
AT bidenedmundn comparisonoftwonormativepaediatricgaitdatabases