Cargando…
Preservation of skin DNA for oligonucleotide array CGH studies: a feasibility study
Array-based comparative genomic hybridization (a-CGH) is a promising tool for clinical genomic studies. However, pre-analytical sample preparation methods have not been fully evaluated for this purpose. Parallel sections of normal male human skin biopsy samples were collected and immediately immerse...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1950585/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17665208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00403-007-0773-6 |
_version_ | 1782134566062915584 |
---|---|
author | Nassiri, Mehdi Gugic, Dijana Olczyk, Joseph Ramos, Sharon Vincek, Vladimir |
author_facet | Nassiri, Mehdi Gugic, Dijana Olczyk, Joseph Ramos, Sharon Vincek, Vladimir |
author_sort | Nassiri, Mehdi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Array-based comparative genomic hybridization (a-CGH) is a promising tool for clinical genomic studies. However, pre-analytical sample preparation methods have not been fully evaluated for this purpose. Parallel sections of normal male human skin biopsy samples were collected and immediately immersed in saline, formalin and a molecular fixative for 8, 12 and 24 h. Genomic DNA was isolated from the samples and subjected to amplification and labeling. Labeled samples were then co-hybridized with normal reference female DNA to Agilent oligonucleotide-based a-CGH 44k slides. Pre-analytic parameters such as DNA yield, quality of genomic DNA and labeling efficacy were evaluated. Also microarray analytical variables, including the feature signal intensity, data distribution dynamic range, signal to noise ratio and background intensity levels were assessed for data quality. DNA yield and quality of genomic DNA—as evaluated by spectrophotometry and gel electrophoresis—were similar for fresh and molecular fixative-exposed samples. In addition, labeling efficacy of dye incorporation was not drastically different. There was no difference between fresh and molecular fixative material comparing scan parameters and stem plot analysis of a-CGH result. Formalin-fixed samples, on the other hand, showed various errors such as oversaturation, non-uniformity in replicates, and decreased signal to noise ratio. Overall, the a-CGH result of formalin samples was not interpretable. DNA extracted from formalin-fixed tissue samples is not suitable for oligonucleotide-based a-CGH studies. On the other hand, the molecular fixative preserves tissue DNA similar to its fresh state with no discernable analytical differences. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1950585 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-19505852007-08-22 Preservation of skin DNA for oligonucleotide array CGH studies: a feasibility study Nassiri, Mehdi Gugic, Dijana Olczyk, Joseph Ramos, Sharon Vincek, Vladimir Arch Dermatol Res Short Communication Array-based comparative genomic hybridization (a-CGH) is a promising tool for clinical genomic studies. However, pre-analytical sample preparation methods have not been fully evaluated for this purpose. Parallel sections of normal male human skin biopsy samples were collected and immediately immersed in saline, formalin and a molecular fixative for 8, 12 and 24 h. Genomic DNA was isolated from the samples and subjected to amplification and labeling. Labeled samples were then co-hybridized with normal reference female DNA to Agilent oligonucleotide-based a-CGH 44k slides. Pre-analytic parameters such as DNA yield, quality of genomic DNA and labeling efficacy were evaluated. Also microarray analytical variables, including the feature signal intensity, data distribution dynamic range, signal to noise ratio and background intensity levels were assessed for data quality. DNA yield and quality of genomic DNA—as evaluated by spectrophotometry and gel electrophoresis—were similar for fresh and molecular fixative-exposed samples. In addition, labeling efficacy of dye incorporation was not drastically different. There was no difference between fresh and molecular fixative material comparing scan parameters and stem plot analysis of a-CGH result. Formalin-fixed samples, on the other hand, showed various errors such as oversaturation, non-uniformity in replicates, and decreased signal to noise ratio. Overall, the a-CGH result of formalin samples was not interpretable. DNA extracted from formalin-fixed tissue samples is not suitable for oligonucleotide-based a-CGH studies. On the other hand, the molecular fixative preserves tissue DNA similar to its fresh state with no discernable analytical differences. Springer-Verlag 2007-07-31 2007-09 /pmc/articles/PMC1950585/ /pubmed/17665208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00403-007-0773-6 Text en © Springer-Verlag 2007 |
spellingShingle | Short Communication Nassiri, Mehdi Gugic, Dijana Olczyk, Joseph Ramos, Sharon Vincek, Vladimir Preservation of skin DNA for oligonucleotide array CGH studies: a feasibility study |
title | Preservation of skin DNA for oligonucleotide array CGH studies: a feasibility study |
title_full | Preservation of skin DNA for oligonucleotide array CGH studies: a feasibility study |
title_fullStr | Preservation of skin DNA for oligonucleotide array CGH studies: a feasibility study |
title_full_unstemmed | Preservation of skin DNA for oligonucleotide array CGH studies: a feasibility study |
title_short | Preservation of skin DNA for oligonucleotide array CGH studies: a feasibility study |
title_sort | preservation of skin dna for oligonucleotide array cgh studies: a feasibility study |
topic | Short Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1950585/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17665208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00403-007-0773-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nassirimehdi preservationofskindnaforoligonucleotidearraycghstudiesafeasibilitystudy AT gugicdijana preservationofskindnaforoligonucleotidearraycghstudiesafeasibilitystudy AT olczykjoseph preservationofskindnaforoligonucleotidearraycghstudiesafeasibilitystudy AT ramossharon preservationofskindnaforoligonucleotidearraycghstudiesafeasibilitystudy AT vincekvladimir preservationofskindnaforoligonucleotidearraycghstudiesafeasibilitystudy |