Cargando…

Preservation of skin DNA for oligonucleotide array CGH studies: a feasibility study

Array-based comparative genomic hybridization (a-CGH) is a promising tool for clinical genomic studies. However, pre-analytical sample preparation methods have not been fully evaluated for this purpose. Parallel sections of normal male human skin biopsy samples were collected and immediately immerse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nassiri, Mehdi, Gugic, Dijana, Olczyk, Joseph, Ramos, Sharon, Vincek, Vladimir
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1950585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17665208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00403-007-0773-6
_version_ 1782134566062915584
author Nassiri, Mehdi
Gugic, Dijana
Olczyk, Joseph
Ramos, Sharon
Vincek, Vladimir
author_facet Nassiri, Mehdi
Gugic, Dijana
Olczyk, Joseph
Ramos, Sharon
Vincek, Vladimir
author_sort Nassiri, Mehdi
collection PubMed
description Array-based comparative genomic hybridization (a-CGH) is a promising tool for clinical genomic studies. However, pre-analytical sample preparation methods have not been fully evaluated for this purpose. Parallel sections of normal male human skin biopsy samples were collected and immediately immersed in saline, formalin and a molecular fixative for 8, 12 and 24 h. Genomic DNA was isolated from the samples and subjected to amplification and labeling. Labeled samples were then co-hybridized with normal reference female DNA to Agilent oligonucleotide-based a-CGH 44k slides. Pre-analytic parameters such as DNA yield, quality of genomic DNA and labeling efficacy were evaluated. Also microarray analytical variables, including the feature signal intensity, data distribution dynamic range, signal to noise ratio and background intensity levels were assessed for data quality. DNA yield and quality of genomic DNA—as evaluated by spectrophotometry and gel electrophoresis—were similar for fresh and molecular fixative-exposed samples. In addition, labeling efficacy of dye incorporation was not drastically different. There was no difference between fresh and molecular fixative material comparing scan parameters and stem plot analysis of a-CGH result. Formalin-fixed samples, on the other hand, showed various errors such as oversaturation, non-uniformity in replicates, and decreased signal to noise ratio. Overall, the a-CGH result of formalin samples was not interpretable. DNA extracted from formalin-fixed tissue samples is not suitable for oligonucleotide-based a-CGH studies. On the other hand, the molecular fixative preserves tissue DNA similar to its fresh state with no discernable analytical differences.
format Text
id pubmed-1950585
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-19505852007-08-22 Preservation of skin DNA for oligonucleotide array CGH studies: a feasibility study Nassiri, Mehdi Gugic, Dijana Olczyk, Joseph Ramos, Sharon Vincek, Vladimir Arch Dermatol Res Short Communication Array-based comparative genomic hybridization (a-CGH) is a promising tool for clinical genomic studies. However, pre-analytical sample preparation methods have not been fully evaluated for this purpose. Parallel sections of normal male human skin biopsy samples were collected and immediately immersed in saline, formalin and a molecular fixative for 8, 12 and 24 h. Genomic DNA was isolated from the samples and subjected to amplification and labeling. Labeled samples were then co-hybridized with normal reference female DNA to Agilent oligonucleotide-based a-CGH 44k slides. Pre-analytic parameters such as DNA yield, quality of genomic DNA and labeling efficacy were evaluated. Also microarray analytical variables, including the feature signal intensity, data distribution dynamic range, signal to noise ratio and background intensity levels were assessed for data quality. DNA yield and quality of genomic DNA—as evaluated by spectrophotometry and gel electrophoresis—were similar for fresh and molecular fixative-exposed samples. In addition, labeling efficacy of dye incorporation was not drastically different. There was no difference between fresh and molecular fixative material comparing scan parameters and stem plot analysis of a-CGH result. Formalin-fixed samples, on the other hand, showed various errors such as oversaturation, non-uniformity in replicates, and decreased signal to noise ratio. Overall, the a-CGH result of formalin samples was not interpretable. DNA extracted from formalin-fixed tissue samples is not suitable for oligonucleotide-based a-CGH studies. On the other hand, the molecular fixative preserves tissue DNA similar to its fresh state with no discernable analytical differences. Springer-Verlag 2007-07-31 2007-09 /pmc/articles/PMC1950585/ /pubmed/17665208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00403-007-0773-6 Text en © Springer-Verlag 2007
spellingShingle Short Communication
Nassiri, Mehdi
Gugic, Dijana
Olczyk, Joseph
Ramos, Sharon
Vincek, Vladimir
Preservation of skin DNA for oligonucleotide array CGH studies: a feasibility study
title Preservation of skin DNA for oligonucleotide array CGH studies: a feasibility study
title_full Preservation of skin DNA for oligonucleotide array CGH studies: a feasibility study
title_fullStr Preservation of skin DNA for oligonucleotide array CGH studies: a feasibility study
title_full_unstemmed Preservation of skin DNA for oligonucleotide array CGH studies: a feasibility study
title_short Preservation of skin DNA for oligonucleotide array CGH studies: a feasibility study
title_sort preservation of skin dna for oligonucleotide array cgh studies: a feasibility study
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1950585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17665208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00403-007-0773-6
work_keys_str_mv AT nassirimehdi preservationofskindnaforoligonucleotidearraycghstudiesafeasibilitystudy
AT gugicdijana preservationofskindnaforoligonucleotidearraycghstudiesafeasibilitystudy
AT olczykjoseph preservationofskindnaforoligonucleotidearraycghstudiesafeasibilitystudy
AT ramossharon preservationofskindnaforoligonucleotidearraycghstudiesafeasibilitystudy
AT vincekvladimir preservationofskindnaforoligonucleotidearraycghstudiesafeasibilitystudy