Cargando…
No Language-Specific Activation during Linguistic Processing of Observed Actions
BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that cortical neural systems for language evolved from motor cortical systems, in particular from those fronto-parietal systems responding also to action observation. While previous studies have shown shared cortical systems for action – or action observation - and...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1963318/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17849020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000891 |
_version_ | 1782134635251105792 |
---|---|
author | Meister, Ingo G. Iacoboni, Marco |
author_facet | Meister, Ingo G. Iacoboni, Marco |
author_sort | Meister, Ingo G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that cortical neural systems for language evolved from motor cortical systems, in particular from those fronto-parietal systems responding also to action observation. While previous studies have shown shared cortical systems for action – or action observation - and language, they did not address the question of whether linguistic processing of visual stimuli occurs only within a subset of fronto-parietal areas responding to action observation. If this is true, the hypothesis that language evolved from fronto-parietal systems matching action execution and action observation would be strongly reinforced. METHODOLOGY/ PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while subjects watched video stimuli of hand-object-interactions and control photo stimuli of the objects and performed linguistic (conceptual and phonological), and perceptual tasks. Since stimuli were identical for linguistic and perceptual tasks, differential activations had to be related to task demands. The results revealed that the linguistic tasks activated left inferior frontal areas that were subsets of a large bilateral fronto-parietal network activated during action perception. Not a single cortical area demonstrated exclusive – or even simply higher - activation for the linguistic tasks compared to the action perception task. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that linguistic tasks do not only share common neural representations but essentially activate a subset of the action observation network if identical stimuli are used. Our findings strongly support the evolutionary hypothesis that fronto-parietal systems matching action execution and observation were co-opted for language, a process known as exaptation. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1963318 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-19633182007-09-12 No Language-Specific Activation during Linguistic Processing of Observed Actions Meister, Ingo G. Iacoboni, Marco PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that cortical neural systems for language evolved from motor cortical systems, in particular from those fronto-parietal systems responding also to action observation. While previous studies have shown shared cortical systems for action – or action observation - and language, they did not address the question of whether linguistic processing of visual stimuli occurs only within a subset of fronto-parietal areas responding to action observation. If this is true, the hypothesis that language evolved from fronto-parietal systems matching action execution and action observation would be strongly reinforced. METHODOLOGY/ PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while subjects watched video stimuli of hand-object-interactions and control photo stimuli of the objects and performed linguistic (conceptual and phonological), and perceptual tasks. Since stimuli were identical for linguistic and perceptual tasks, differential activations had to be related to task demands. The results revealed that the linguistic tasks activated left inferior frontal areas that were subsets of a large bilateral fronto-parietal network activated during action perception. Not a single cortical area demonstrated exclusive – or even simply higher - activation for the linguistic tasks compared to the action perception task. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that linguistic tasks do not only share common neural representations but essentially activate a subset of the action observation network if identical stimuli are used. Our findings strongly support the evolutionary hypothesis that fronto-parietal systems matching action execution and observation were co-opted for language, a process known as exaptation. Public Library of Science 2007-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC1963318/ /pubmed/17849020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000891 Text en Meister, Iacoboni. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Meister, Ingo G. Iacoboni, Marco No Language-Specific Activation during Linguistic Processing of Observed Actions |
title | No Language-Specific Activation during Linguistic Processing of Observed Actions |
title_full | No Language-Specific Activation during Linguistic Processing of Observed Actions |
title_fullStr | No Language-Specific Activation during Linguistic Processing of Observed Actions |
title_full_unstemmed | No Language-Specific Activation during Linguistic Processing of Observed Actions |
title_short | No Language-Specific Activation during Linguistic Processing of Observed Actions |
title_sort | no language-specific activation during linguistic processing of observed actions |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1963318/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17849020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000891 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meisteringog nolanguagespecificactivationduringlinguisticprocessingofobservedactions AT iacobonimarco nolanguagespecificactivationduringlinguisticprocessingofobservedactions |