Cargando…
A Pragmatic Randomised, Controlled Trial of Intensive Care follow up programmes in improving Longer-term outcomes from critical illness. The PRACTICAL study
BACKGROUND: A number of intensive care (ICU) patients experience significant problems with physical, psychological, and social functioning for some time after discharge from ICU. These problems have implications not just for patients, but impose a continuing financial burden for the National Health...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1963330/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17645791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-7-116 |
_version_ | 1782134638253178880 |
---|---|
author | Cuthbertson, Brian H Rattray, Janice Johnston, Marie Wildsmith, J Anthony Wilson, Edward Hernendez, Rodolfo Ramsey, Craig Hull, Alastair M Norrie, John Campbell, Marion |
author_facet | Cuthbertson, Brian H Rattray, Janice Johnston, Marie Wildsmith, J Anthony Wilson, Edward Hernendez, Rodolfo Ramsey, Craig Hull, Alastair M Norrie, John Campbell, Marion |
author_sort | Cuthbertson, Brian H |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A number of intensive care (ICU) patients experience significant problems with physical, psychological, and social functioning for some time after discharge from ICU. These problems have implications not just for patients, but impose a continuing financial burden for the National Health Service. To support recovery, a number of hospitals across the UK have developed Intensive Care follow-up clinics. However, there is a lack of evidence base to support these, and this study aims to test the hypothesis that intensive care follow up programmes are effective and cost-effective at improving physical and psychological quality of life in the year after intensive care discharge. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a multi-centre, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial. Patients (n = 270) will be recruited prior to hospital discharge from three intensive care units in the UK, and randomised to one of two groups. The control group will receive standard in-hospital follow-up and the intervention group will participate in an ICU follow-up programme with clinic appointments 2–3 and 9 months after ICU discharge. The primary outcome measure is Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) 12 months after ICU discharge as measured by the Short Form-36. Secondary measures include: HRQoL at six months; Quality-adjusted life years using EQ-5D; posttraumatic psychopathology as measured by Davidson Trauma Scale; and anxiety and depression using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale at both six and twelve months after ICU discharge. Contacts with health services in the twelve months after ICU discharge will be measured as part of the economic analysis. DISCUSSION: The provision of intensive care follow-up clinics within the UK has developed in an ad hoc manner, is inconsistent in both the number of hospitals offering such a service or in the type of service offered. This study provides the opportunity to evaluate such services both in terms of patient benefit and cost-effectiveness. The results of this study therefore will inform clinical practice and policy with regard to the appropriate development of such services aimed at improving outcomes after intensive care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN24294750. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1963330 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-19633302007-09-01 A Pragmatic Randomised, Controlled Trial of Intensive Care follow up programmes in improving Longer-term outcomes from critical illness. The PRACTICAL study Cuthbertson, Brian H Rattray, Janice Johnston, Marie Wildsmith, J Anthony Wilson, Edward Hernendez, Rodolfo Ramsey, Craig Hull, Alastair M Norrie, John Campbell, Marion BMC Health Serv Res Study Protocol BACKGROUND: A number of intensive care (ICU) patients experience significant problems with physical, psychological, and social functioning for some time after discharge from ICU. These problems have implications not just for patients, but impose a continuing financial burden for the National Health Service. To support recovery, a number of hospitals across the UK have developed Intensive Care follow-up clinics. However, there is a lack of evidence base to support these, and this study aims to test the hypothesis that intensive care follow up programmes are effective and cost-effective at improving physical and psychological quality of life in the year after intensive care discharge. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a multi-centre, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial. Patients (n = 270) will be recruited prior to hospital discharge from three intensive care units in the UK, and randomised to one of two groups. The control group will receive standard in-hospital follow-up and the intervention group will participate in an ICU follow-up programme with clinic appointments 2–3 and 9 months after ICU discharge. The primary outcome measure is Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) 12 months after ICU discharge as measured by the Short Form-36. Secondary measures include: HRQoL at six months; Quality-adjusted life years using EQ-5D; posttraumatic psychopathology as measured by Davidson Trauma Scale; and anxiety and depression using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale at both six and twelve months after ICU discharge. Contacts with health services in the twelve months after ICU discharge will be measured as part of the economic analysis. DISCUSSION: The provision of intensive care follow-up clinics within the UK has developed in an ad hoc manner, is inconsistent in both the number of hospitals offering such a service or in the type of service offered. This study provides the opportunity to evaluate such services both in terms of patient benefit and cost-effectiveness. The results of this study therefore will inform clinical practice and policy with regard to the appropriate development of such services aimed at improving outcomes after intensive care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN24294750. BioMed Central 2007-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC1963330/ /pubmed/17645791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-7-116 Text en Copyright © 2007 Cuthbertson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Cuthbertson, Brian H Rattray, Janice Johnston, Marie Wildsmith, J Anthony Wilson, Edward Hernendez, Rodolfo Ramsey, Craig Hull, Alastair M Norrie, John Campbell, Marion A Pragmatic Randomised, Controlled Trial of Intensive Care follow up programmes in improving Longer-term outcomes from critical illness. The PRACTICAL study |
title | A Pragmatic Randomised, Controlled Trial of Intensive Care follow up programmes in improving Longer-term outcomes from critical illness. The PRACTICAL study |
title_full | A Pragmatic Randomised, Controlled Trial of Intensive Care follow up programmes in improving Longer-term outcomes from critical illness. The PRACTICAL study |
title_fullStr | A Pragmatic Randomised, Controlled Trial of Intensive Care follow up programmes in improving Longer-term outcomes from critical illness. The PRACTICAL study |
title_full_unstemmed | A Pragmatic Randomised, Controlled Trial of Intensive Care follow up programmes in improving Longer-term outcomes from critical illness. The PRACTICAL study |
title_short | A Pragmatic Randomised, Controlled Trial of Intensive Care follow up programmes in improving Longer-term outcomes from critical illness. The PRACTICAL study |
title_sort | pragmatic randomised, controlled trial of intensive care follow up programmes in improving longer-term outcomes from critical illness. the practical study |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1963330/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17645791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-7-116 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cuthbertsonbrianh apragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofintensivecarefollowupprogrammesinimprovinglongertermoutcomesfromcriticalillnessthepracticalstudy AT rattrayjanice apragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofintensivecarefollowupprogrammesinimprovinglongertermoutcomesfromcriticalillnessthepracticalstudy AT johnstonmarie apragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofintensivecarefollowupprogrammesinimprovinglongertermoutcomesfromcriticalillnessthepracticalstudy AT wildsmithjanthony apragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofintensivecarefollowupprogrammesinimprovinglongertermoutcomesfromcriticalillnessthepracticalstudy AT wilsonedward apragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofintensivecarefollowupprogrammesinimprovinglongertermoutcomesfromcriticalillnessthepracticalstudy AT hernendezrodolfo apragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofintensivecarefollowupprogrammesinimprovinglongertermoutcomesfromcriticalillnessthepracticalstudy AT ramseycraig apragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofintensivecarefollowupprogrammesinimprovinglongertermoutcomesfromcriticalillnessthepracticalstudy AT hullalastairm apragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofintensivecarefollowupprogrammesinimprovinglongertermoutcomesfromcriticalillnessthepracticalstudy AT norriejohn apragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofintensivecarefollowupprogrammesinimprovinglongertermoutcomesfromcriticalillnessthepracticalstudy AT campbellmarion apragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofintensivecarefollowupprogrammesinimprovinglongertermoutcomesfromcriticalillnessthepracticalstudy AT cuthbertsonbrianh pragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofintensivecarefollowupprogrammesinimprovinglongertermoutcomesfromcriticalillnessthepracticalstudy AT rattrayjanice pragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofintensivecarefollowupprogrammesinimprovinglongertermoutcomesfromcriticalillnessthepracticalstudy AT johnstonmarie pragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofintensivecarefollowupprogrammesinimprovinglongertermoutcomesfromcriticalillnessthepracticalstudy AT wildsmithjanthony pragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofintensivecarefollowupprogrammesinimprovinglongertermoutcomesfromcriticalillnessthepracticalstudy AT wilsonedward pragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofintensivecarefollowupprogrammesinimprovinglongertermoutcomesfromcriticalillnessthepracticalstudy AT hernendezrodolfo pragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofintensivecarefollowupprogrammesinimprovinglongertermoutcomesfromcriticalillnessthepracticalstudy AT ramseycraig pragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofintensivecarefollowupprogrammesinimprovinglongertermoutcomesfromcriticalillnessthepracticalstudy AT hullalastairm pragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofintensivecarefollowupprogrammesinimprovinglongertermoutcomesfromcriticalillnessthepracticalstudy AT norriejohn pragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofintensivecarefollowupprogrammesinimprovinglongertermoutcomesfromcriticalillnessthepracticalstudy AT campbellmarion pragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofintensivecarefollowupprogrammesinimprovinglongertermoutcomesfromcriticalillnessthepracticalstudy |