Cargando…

A Pragmatic Randomised, Controlled Trial of Intensive Care follow up programmes in improving Longer-term outcomes from critical illness. The PRACTICAL study

BACKGROUND: A number of intensive care (ICU) patients experience significant problems with physical, psychological, and social functioning for some time after discharge from ICU. These problems have implications not just for patients, but impose a continuing financial burden for the National Health...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cuthbertson, Brian H, Rattray, Janice, Johnston, Marie, Wildsmith, J Anthony, Wilson, Edward, Hernendez, Rodolfo, Ramsey, Craig, Hull, Alastair M, Norrie, John, Campbell, Marion
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1963330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17645791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-7-116
_version_ 1782134638253178880
author Cuthbertson, Brian H
Rattray, Janice
Johnston, Marie
Wildsmith, J Anthony
Wilson, Edward
Hernendez, Rodolfo
Ramsey, Craig
Hull, Alastair M
Norrie, John
Campbell, Marion
author_facet Cuthbertson, Brian H
Rattray, Janice
Johnston, Marie
Wildsmith, J Anthony
Wilson, Edward
Hernendez, Rodolfo
Ramsey, Craig
Hull, Alastair M
Norrie, John
Campbell, Marion
author_sort Cuthbertson, Brian H
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A number of intensive care (ICU) patients experience significant problems with physical, psychological, and social functioning for some time after discharge from ICU. These problems have implications not just for patients, but impose a continuing financial burden for the National Health Service. To support recovery, a number of hospitals across the UK have developed Intensive Care follow-up clinics. However, there is a lack of evidence base to support these, and this study aims to test the hypothesis that intensive care follow up programmes are effective and cost-effective at improving physical and psychological quality of life in the year after intensive care discharge. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a multi-centre, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial. Patients (n = 270) will be recruited prior to hospital discharge from three intensive care units in the UK, and randomised to one of two groups. The control group will receive standard in-hospital follow-up and the intervention group will participate in an ICU follow-up programme with clinic appointments 2–3 and 9 months after ICU discharge. The primary outcome measure is Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) 12 months after ICU discharge as measured by the Short Form-36. Secondary measures include: HRQoL at six months; Quality-adjusted life years using EQ-5D; posttraumatic psychopathology as measured by Davidson Trauma Scale; and anxiety and depression using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale at both six and twelve months after ICU discharge. Contacts with health services in the twelve months after ICU discharge will be measured as part of the economic analysis. DISCUSSION: The provision of intensive care follow-up clinics within the UK has developed in an ad hoc manner, is inconsistent in both the number of hospitals offering such a service or in the type of service offered. This study provides the opportunity to evaluate such services both in terms of patient benefit and cost-effectiveness. The results of this study therefore will inform clinical practice and policy with regard to the appropriate development of such services aimed at improving outcomes after intensive care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN24294750.
format Text
id pubmed-1963330
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-19633302007-09-01 A Pragmatic Randomised, Controlled Trial of Intensive Care follow up programmes in improving Longer-term outcomes from critical illness. The PRACTICAL study Cuthbertson, Brian H Rattray, Janice Johnston, Marie Wildsmith, J Anthony Wilson, Edward Hernendez, Rodolfo Ramsey, Craig Hull, Alastair M Norrie, John Campbell, Marion BMC Health Serv Res Study Protocol BACKGROUND: A number of intensive care (ICU) patients experience significant problems with physical, psychological, and social functioning for some time after discharge from ICU. These problems have implications not just for patients, but impose a continuing financial burden for the National Health Service. To support recovery, a number of hospitals across the UK have developed Intensive Care follow-up clinics. However, there is a lack of evidence base to support these, and this study aims to test the hypothesis that intensive care follow up programmes are effective and cost-effective at improving physical and psychological quality of life in the year after intensive care discharge. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a multi-centre, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial. Patients (n = 270) will be recruited prior to hospital discharge from three intensive care units in the UK, and randomised to one of two groups. The control group will receive standard in-hospital follow-up and the intervention group will participate in an ICU follow-up programme with clinic appointments 2–3 and 9 months after ICU discharge. The primary outcome measure is Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) 12 months after ICU discharge as measured by the Short Form-36. Secondary measures include: HRQoL at six months; Quality-adjusted life years using EQ-5D; posttraumatic psychopathology as measured by Davidson Trauma Scale; and anxiety and depression using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale at both six and twelve months after ICU discharge. Contacts with health services in the twelve months after ICU discharge will be measured as part of the economic analysis. DISCUSSION: The provision of intensive care follow-up clinics within the UK has developed in an ad hoc manner, is inconsistent in both the number of hospitals offering such a service or in the type of service offered. This study provides the opportunity to evaluate such services both in terms of patient benefit and cost-effectiveness. The results of this study therefore will inform clinical practice and policy with regard to the appropriate development of such services aimed at improving outcomes after intensive care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN24294750. BioMed Central 2007-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC1963330/ /pubmed/17645791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-7-116 Text en Copyright © 2007 Cuthbertson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Cuthbertson, Brian H
Rattray, Janice
Johnston, Marie
Wildsmith, J Anthony
Wilson, Edward
Hernendez, Rodolfo
Ramsey, Craig
Hull, Alastair M
Norrie, John
Campbell, Marion
A Pragmatic Randomised, Controlled Trial of Intensive Care follow up programmes in improving Longer-term outcomes from critical illness. The PRACTICAL study
title A Pragmatic Randomised, Controlled Trial of Intensive Care follow up programmes in improving Longer-term outcomes from critical illness. The PRACTICAL study
title_full A Pragmatic Randomised, Controlled Trial of Intensive Care follow up programmes in improving Longer-term outcomes from critical illness. The PRACTICAL study
title_fullStr A Pragmatic Randomised, Controlled Trial of Intensive Care follow up programmes in improving Longer-term outcomes from critical illness. The PRACTICAL study
title_full_unstemmed A Pragmatic Randomised, Controlled Trial of Intensive Care follow up programmes in improving Longer-term outcomes from critical illness. The PRACTICAL study
title_short A Pragmatic Randomised, Controlled Trial of Intensive Care follow up programmes in improving Longer-term outcomes from critical illness. The PRACTICAL study
title_sort pragmatic randomised, controlled trial of intensive care follow up programmes in improving longer-term outcomes from critical illness. the practical study
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1963330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17645791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-7-116
work_keys_str_mv AT cuthbertsonbrianh apragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofintensivecarefollowupprogrammesinimprovinglongertermoutcomesfromcriticalillnessthepracticalstudy
AT rattrayjanice apragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofintensivecarefollowupprogrammesinimprovinglongertermoutcomesfromcriticalillnessthepracticalstudy
AT johnstonmarie apragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofintensivecarefollowupprogrammesinimprovinglongertermoutcomesfromcriticalillnessthepracticalstudy
AT wildsmithjanthony apragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofintensivecarefollowupprogrammesinimprovinglongertermoutcomesfromcriticalillnessthepracticalstudy
AT wilsonedward apragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofintensivecarefollowupprogrammesinimprovinglongertermoutcomesfromcriticalillnessthepracticalstudy
AT hernendezrodolfo apragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofintensivecarefollowupprogrammesinimprovinglongertermoutcomesfromcriticalillnessthepracticalstudy
AT ramseycraig apragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofintensivecarefollowupprogrammesinimprovinglongertermoutcomesfromcriticalillnessthepracticalstudy
AT hullalastairm apragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofintensivecarefollowupprogrammesinimprovinglongertermoutcomesfromcriticalillnessthepracticalstudy
AT norriejohn apragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofintensivecarefollowupprogrammesinimprovinglongertermoutcomesfromcriticalillnessthepracticalstudy
AT campbellmarion apragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofintensivecarefollowupprogrammesinimprovinglongertermoutcomesfromcriticalillnessthepracticalstudy
AT cuthbertsonbrianh pragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofintensivecarefollowupprogrammesinimprovinglongertermoutcomesfromcriticalillnessthepracticalstudy
AT rattrayjanice pragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofintensivecarefollowupprogrammesinimprovinglongertermoutcomesfromcriticalillnessthepracticalstudy
AT johnstonmarie pragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofintensivecarefollowupprogrammesinimprovinglongertermoutcomesfromcriticalillnessthepracticalstudy
AT wildsmithjanthony pragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofintensivecarefollowupprogrammesinimprovinglongertermoutcomesfromcriticalillnessthepracticalstudy
AT wilsonedward pragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofintensivecarefollowupprogrammesinimprovinglongertermoutcomesfromcriticalillnessthepracticalstudy
AT hernendezrodolfo pragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofintensivecarefollowupprogrammesinimprovinglongertermoutcomesfromcriticalillnessthepracticalstudy
AT ramseycraig pragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofintensivecarefollowupprogrammesinimprovinglongertermoutcomesfromcriticalillnessthepracticalstudy
AT hullalastairm pragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofintensivecarefollowupprogrammesinimprovinglongertermoutcomesfromcriticalillnessthepracticalstudy
AT norriejohn pragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofintensivecarefollowupprogrammesinimprovinglongertermoutcomesfromcriticalillnessthepracticalstudy
AT campbellmarion pragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofintensivecarefollowupprogrammesinimprovinglongertermoutcomesfromcriticalillnessthepracticalstudy