Cargando…

Improvements in survival of the uncemented Nottingham Total Shoulder prosthesis: a prospective comparative study

BACKGROUND: The uncemented Nottingham Total Shoulder Replacement prosthesis system (Nottingham TSR) was developed from the previous BioModular(® )shoulder prosthesis taking into consideration the causes of the initial implant's failure. We investigated the impact of changes in the design of Not...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rosenberg, Nahum, Neumann, Lars, Modi, Amit, Mersich, Istvan J, Wallace, Angus W
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1964758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17683577
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-8-76
_version_ 1782134653375741952
author Rosenberg, Nahum
Neumann, Lars
Modi, Amit
Mersich, Istvan J
Wallace, Angus W
author_facet Rosenberg, Nahum
Neumann, Lars
Modi, Amit
Mersich, Istvan J
Wallace, Angus W
author_sort Rosenberg, Nahum
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The uncemented Nottingham Total Shoulder Replacement prosthesis system (Nottingham TSR) was developed from the previous BioModular(® )shoulder prosthesis taking into consideration the causes of the initial implant's failure. We investigated the impact of changes in the design of Nottingham TSR prosthesis on its survivorship rate. METHODS: Survivorship analyses of three types of uncemented total shoulder arthroplasty prostheses (BioModular(®), initial Nottingham TSR and current Nottingham TSR systems with 11, 8 and 4 year survivorship data respectively) were compared. All these prostheses were implanted for the treatment of disabling pain in the shoulder due to primary and secondary osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis. Each type of the prosthesis studied was implanted in consecutive group of patients – 90 patients with BioModular(® )system, 103 with the initial Nottingham TSR and 34 patients with the current Nottingham TSR system. The comparison of the annual cumulative survivorship values in the compatible time range between the three groups was done according to the paired t test. RESULTS: The 8-year and 11-year survivorship rates for the initially used modified BioModular(® )uncemented prosthesis were relatively low (75.6% and 71.7% respectively) comparing to the reported survivorship of the conventional cemented implants. The 8-year survivorship for the uncemented Nottingham TSR prosthesis was significantly higher (81.8%), but still not in the desired range of above 90%, that is found in other cemented designs. Glenoid component loosening was the main factor of prosthesis failure in both prostheses and mainly occurred in the first 4 postoperative years. The 4-year survivorship of the currently re-designed Nottingham TSR prosthesis, with hydroxylapatite coating of the glenoid baseplate, was significantly higher, 93.1% as compared to 85.1% of the previous Nottingham TSR. CONCLUSION: The initial Nottingham shoulder prosthesis showed significantly higher survivorship than the BioModular(® )uncemented prosthesis, but lower than expected. Subsequently re-designed Nottingham TSR system presented a high short term survivorship rate that encourages its ongoing use
format Text
id pubmed-1964758
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-19647582007-09-05 Improvements in survival of the uncemented Nottingham Total Shoulder prosthesis: a prospective comparative study Rosenberg, Nahum Neumann, Lars Modi, Amit Mersich, Istvan J Wallace, Angus W BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The uncemented Nottingham Total Shoulder Replacement prosthesis system (Nottingham TSR) was developed from the previous BioModular(® )shoulder prosthesis taking into consideration the causes of the initial implant's failure. We investigated the impact of changes in the design of Nottingham TSR prosthesis on its survivorship rate. METHODS: Survivorship analyses of three types of uncemented total shoulder arthroplasty prostheses (BioModular(®), initial Nottingham TSR and current Nottingham TSR systems with 11, 8 and 4 year survivorship data respectively) were compared. All these prostheses were implanted for the treatment of disabling pain in the shoulder due to primary and secondary osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis. Each type of the prosthesis studied was implanted in consecutive group of patients – 90 patients with BioModular(® )system, 103 with the initial Nottingham TSR and 34 patients with the current Nottingham TSR system. The comparison of the annual cumulative survivorship values in the compatible time range between the three groups was done according to the paired t test. RESULTS: The 8-year and 11-year survivorship rates for the initially used modified BioModular(® )uncemented prosthesis were relatively low (75.6% and 71.7% respectively) comparing to the reported survivorship of the conventional cemented implants. The 8-year survivorship for the uncemented Nottingham TSR prosthesis was significantly higher (81.8%), but still not in the desired range of above 90%, that is found in other cemented designs. Glenoid component loosening was the main factor of prosthesis failure in both prostheses and mainly occurred in the first 4 postoperative years. The 4-year survivorship of the currently re-designed Nottingham TSR prosthesis, with hydroxylapatite coating of the glenoid baseplate, was significantly higher, 93.1% as compared to 85.1% of the previous Nottingham TSR. CONCLUSION: The initial Nottingham shoulder prosthesis showed significantly higher survivorship than the BioModular(® )uncemented prosthesis, but lower than expected. Subsequently re-designed Nottingham TSR system presented a high short term survivorship rate that encourages its ongoing use BioMed Central 2007-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC1964758/ /pubmed/17683577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-8-76 Text en Copyright © 2007 Rosenberg et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rosenberg, Nahum
Neumann, Lars
Modi, Amit
Mersich, Istvan J
Wallace, Angus W
Improvements in survival of the uncemented Nottingham Total Shoulder prosthesis: a prospective comparative study
title Improvements in survival of the uncemented Nottingham Total Shoulder prosthesis: a prospective comparative study
title_full Improvements in survival of the uncemented Nottingham Total Shoulder prosthesis: a prospective comparative study
title_fullStr Improvements in survival of the uncemented Nottingham Total Shoulder prosthesis: a prospective comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Improvements in survival of the uncemented Nottingham Total Shoulder prosthesis: a prospective comparative study
title_short Improvements in survival of the uncemented Nottingham Total Shoulder prosthesis: a prospective comparative study
title_sort improvements in survival of the uncemented nottingham total shoulder prosthesis: a prospective comparative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1964758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17683577
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-8-76
work_keys_str_mv AT rosenbergnahum improvementsinsurvivaloftheuncementednottinghamtotalshoulderprosthesisaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT neumannlars improvementsinsurvivaloftheuncementednottinghamtotalshoulderprosthesisaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT modiamit improvementsinsurvivaloftheuncementednottinghamtotalshoulderprosthesisaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT mersichistvanj improvementsinsurvivaloftheuncementednottinghamtotalshoulderprosthesisaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT wallaceangusw improvementsinsurvivaloftheuncementednottinghamtotalshoulderprosthesisaprospectivecomparativestudy