Cargando…

Cell killing and DNA damage by etoposide in Chinese hamster V79 monolayers and spheroids: influence of growth kinetics, growth environment and DNA packaging.

Cells from V79 multicell spheroids must be exposed to approximately 50 times more etoposide than exponentially growing monolayers in order to produce the same amount of cell killing. A part of this difference in sensitivity is readily explained by the decrease in growth fraction of large spheroids,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olive, P. L., Banáth, J. P., Evans, H. H.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 1993
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1968270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8382510
_version_ 1782134703632941056
author Olive, P. L.
Banáth, J. P.
Evans, H. H.
author_facet Olive, P. L.
Banáth, J. P.
Evans, H. H.
author_sort Olive, P. L.
collection PubMed
description Cells from V79 multicell spheroids must be exposed to approximately 50 times more etoposide than exponentially growing monolayers in order to produce the same amount of cell killing. A part of this difference in sensitivity is readily explained by the decrease in growth fraction of large spheroids, and by the protection afforded by nutrient deprivation which also reduces cellular ATP. However, cells composing the outer 10% of large (approximately 600 microns diameter) V79 spheroids, although actively cycling, were still ten times more resistant to etoposide than exponentially growing monolayers, regardless of whether cells were exposed in situ in spheroids or dispersed by trypsin immediately prior to exposure to the drug. Four cell doublings (48 h) as monolayers were required before the outer cells of spheroids regained drug sensitivity equivalent to that of exponentially growing monolayers. No differences in uptake/efflux of 3H-etoposide or in levels of p-glycoprotein were observed between monolayers and the outer cells of spheroids. In addition, topoisomerase II protein measured by immunoblotting and topoisomerase II activity measured by decatenation of kinetoplast DNA were not reduced in the outer cells of spheroids compared to monolayers. DNA strand breakage measured in individual cells using the DNA precipitation and comet assays correlated well with cell killing with one exception: DNA damage was not affected when cells were incubated with etoposide in phosphate-buffered saline, although the etoposide concentration required to produce a given amount of cell killing was increased approximately 7-fold compared to cells incubated with the drug in complete medium. These results indicate that etoposide toxicity towards V79 spheroids is influenced not only by proliferative status of the cells but also by factors which may include DNA packaging and the growth environment of the cell prior to and during treatment. IMAGES:
format Text
id pubmed-1968270
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1993
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-19682702009-09-10 Cell killing and DNA damage by etoposide in Chinese hamster V79 monolayers and spheroids: influence of growth kinetics, growth environment and DNA packaging. Olive, P. L. Banáth, J. P. Evans, H. H. Br J Cancer Research Article Cells from V79 multicell spheroids must be exposed to approximately 50 times more etoposide than exponentially growing monolayers in order to produce the same amount of cell killing. A part of this difference in sensitivity is readily explained by the decrease in growth fraction of large spheroids, and by the protection afforded by nutrient deprivation which also reduces cellular ATP. However, cells composing the outer 10% of large (approximately 600 microns diameter) V79 spheroids, although actively cycling, were still ten times more resistant to etoposide than exponentially growing monolayers, regardless of whether cells were exposed in situ in spheroids or dispersed by trypsin immediately prior to exposure to the drug. Four cell doublings (48 h) as monolayers were required before the outer cells of spheroids regained drug sensitivity equivalent to that of exponentially growing monolayers. No differences in uptake/efflux of 3H-etoposide or in levels of p-glycoprotein were observed between monolayers and the outer cells of spheroids. In addition, topoisomerase II protein measured by immunoblotting and topoisomerase II activity measured by decatenation of kinetoplast DNA were not reduced in the outer cells of spheroids compared to monolayers. DNA strand breakage measured in individual cells using the DNA precipitation and comet assays correlated well with cell killing with one exception: DNA damage was not affected when cells were incubated with etoposide in phosphate-buffered saline, although the etoposide concentration required to produce a given amount of cell killing was increased approximately 7-fold compared to cells incubated with the drug in complete medium. These results indicate that etoposide toxicity towards V79 spheroids is influenced not only by proliferative status of the cells but also by factors which may include DNA packaging and the growth environment of the cell prior to and during treatment. IMAGES: Nature Publishing Group 1993-03 /pmc/articles/PMC1968270/ /pubmed/8382510 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Olive, P. L.
Banáth, J. P.
Evans, H. H.
Cell killing and DNA damage by etoposide in Chinese hamster V79 monolayers and spheroids: influence of growth kinetics, growth environment and DNA packaging.
title Cell killing and DNA damage by etoposide in Chinese hamster V79 monolayers and spheroids: influence of growth kinetics, growth environment and DNA packaging.
title_full Cell killing and DNA damage by etoposide in Chinese hamster V79 monolayers and spheroids: influence of growth kinetics, growth environment and DNA packaging.
title_fullStr Cell killing and DNA damage by etoposide in Chinese hamster V79 monolayers and spheroids: influence of growth kinetics, growth environment and DNA packaging.
title_full_unstemmed Cell killing and DNA damage by etoposide in Chinese hamster V79 monolayers and spheroids: influence of growth kinetics, growth environment and DNA packaging.
title_short Cell killing and DNA damage by etoposide in Chinese hamster V79 monolayers and spheroids: influence of growth kinetics, growth environment and DNA packaging.
title_sort cell killing and dna damage by etoposide in chinese hamster v79 monolayers and spheroids: influence of growth kinetics, growth environment and dna packaging.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1968270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8382510
work_keys_str_mv AT olivepl cellkillinganddnadamagebyetoposideinchinesehamsterv79monolayersandspheroidsinfluenceofgrowthkineticsgrowthenvironmentanddnapackaging
AT banathjp cellkillinganddnadamagebyetoposideinchinesehamsterv79monolayersandspheroidsinfluenceofgrowthkineticsgrowthenvironmentanddnapackaging
AT evanshh cellkillinganddnadamagebyetoposideinchinesehamsterv79monolayersandspheroidsinfluenceofgrowthkineticsgrowthenvironmentanddnapackaging