Cargando…

The influence of high dose hydroxyurea on the incorporation of 5-iodo-2-deoxyuridine (IUdR) by human bone marrow and tumour cells in vivo.

Resistance to cytotoxics precludes the successful treatment of many solid tumours. Inhibition of DNA synthesis in normal tissues with antimetabolites such as hydroxyurea (HU) may be a useful means of improving the selective uptake of toxic thymidine analogues by the relatively resistant tumour cells...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Philip, P. A., Kaklamanis, L., Carmichael, J., Tonkin, K., Morrison, H., Gatter, K., Harris, A. L.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 1993
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1968348/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8471420
_version_ 1782134720792887296
author Philip, P. A.
Kaklamanis, L.
Carmichael, J.
Tonkin, K.
Morrison, H.
Gatter, K.
Harris, A. L.
author_facet Philip, P. A.
Kaklamanis, L.
Carmichael, J.
Tonkin, K.
Morrison, H.
Gatter, K.
Harris, A. L.
author_sort Philip, P. A.
collection PubMed
description Resistance to cytotoxics precludes the successful treatment of many solid tumours. Inhibition of DNA synthesis in normal tissues with antimetabolites such as hydroxyurea (HU) may be a useful means of improving the selective uptake of toxic thymidine analogues by the relatively resistant tumour cells. HU also inhibits DNA repair by the critical depletion of intracellular deoxyribonucleotides. Twenty-five patients with various malignancies received 5-iodo-2-deoxyuridine (IUdR) 100 mg m-2 as a 20 min i.v. infusion and the uptake of IUdR was determined 1 h later immunocytochemically. Of these patients, 14 received IUdR 23 h from the start of a continuous i.v. infusion of HU (36 g over 36 h). Uptake of IUdR was equally suppressed in bone marrow and tumour aspirates, 0.1% (+/- 0.2%) of marrow precursor cells and 0.5% (+/- 0.4%) of tumour cells respectively, in patients who received HU compared to the uptake of IUdR in 11 patients who were not given HU 6.8% (+/- 1.1%) and 12.2% (+/- 1.8%) respectively. Mean HU plasma concentrations at the time of IUdR administration was 1.7 +/- 0.2 mM. The growth fraction of tumour cells (using Ki67 labelling) was not changed after treatment with HU. It is concluded that (1) since DNA synthesis is effectively inhibited by HU in tumour cells, differential uptake of radiolabelled IUdR by those cells will not be feasible using the current schedule of HU administration, (2) HU may be used as an inhibitor of DNA repair in vivo since the degree of inhibition correlates with that required to inhibit repair experimentally and that (3) Ki67 labelling index is not useful in studying cell kinetics in patients treated with HU.
format Text
id pubmed-1968348
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1993
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-19683482009-09-10 The influence of high dose hydroxyurea on the incorporation of 5-iodo-2-deoxyuridine (IUdR) by human bone marrow and tumour cells in vivo. Philip, P. A. Kaklamanis, L. Carmichael, J. Tonkin, K. Morrison, H. Gatter, K. Harris, A. L. Br J Cancer Research Article Resistance to cytotoxics precludes the successful treatment of many solid tumours. Inhibition of DNA synthesis in normal tissues with antimetabolites such as hydroxyurea (HU) may be a useful means of improving the selective uptake of toxic thymidine analogues by the relatively resistant tumour cells. HU also inhibits DNA repair by the critical depletion of intracellular deoxyribonucleotides. Twenty-five patients with various malignancies received 5-iodo-2-deoxyuridine (IUdR) 100 mg m-2 as a 20 min i.v. infusion and the uptake of IUdR was determined 1 h later immunocytochemically. Of these patients, 14 received IUdR 23 h from the start of a continuous i.v. infusion of HU (36 g over 36 h). Uptake of IUdR was equally suppressed in bone marrow and tumour aspirates, 0.1% (+/- 0.2%) of marrow precursor cells and 0.5% (+/- 0.4%) of tumour cells respectively, in patients who received HU compared to the uptake of IUdR in 11 patients who were not given HU 6.8% (+/- 1.1%) and 12.2% (+/- 1.8%) respectively. Mean HU plasma concentrations at the time of IUdR administration was 1.7 +/- 0.2 mM. The growth fraction of tumour cells (using Ki67 labelling) was not changed after treatment with HU. It is concluded that (1) since DNA synthesis is effectively inhibited by HU in tumour cells, differential uptake of radiolabelled IUdR by those cells will not be feasible using the current schedule of HU administration, (2) HU may be used as an inhibitor of DNA repair in vivo since the degree of inhibition correlates with that required to inhibit repair experimentally and that (3) Ki67 labelling index is not useful in studying cell kinetics in patients treated with HU. Nature Publishing Group 1993-04 /pmc/articles/PMC1968348/ /pubmed/8471420 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Philip, P. A.
Kaklamanis, L.
Carmichael, J.
Tonkin, K.
Morrison, H.
Gatter, K.
Harris, A. L.
The influence of high dose hydroxyurea on the incorporation of 5-iodo-2-deoxyuridine (IUdR) by human bone marrow and tumour cells in vivo.
title The influence of high dose hydroxyurea on the incorporation of 5-iodo-2-deoxyuridine (IUdR) by human bone marrow and tumour cells in vivo.
title_full The influence of high dose hydroxyurea on the incorporation of 5-iodo-2-deoxyuridine (IUdR) by human bone marrow and tumour cells in vivo.
title_fullStr The influence of high dose hydroxyurea on the incorporation of 5-iodo-2-deoxyuridine (IUdR) by human bone marrow and tumour cells in vivo.
title_full_unstemmed The influence of high dose hydroxyurea on the incorporation of 5-iodo-2-deoxyuridine (IUdR) by human bone marrow and tumour cells in vivo.
title_short The influence of high dose hydroxyurea on the incorporation of 5-iodo-2-deoxyuridine (IUdR) by human bone marrow and tumour cells in vivo.
title_sort influence of high dose hydroxyurea on the incorporation of 5-iodo-2-deoxyuridine (iudr) by human bone marrow and tumour cells in vivo.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1968348/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8471420
work_keys_str_mv AT philippa theinfluenceofhighdosehydroxyureaontheincorporationof5iodo2deoxyuridineiudrbyhumanbonemarrowandtumourcellsinvivo
AT kaklamanisl theinfluenceofhighdosehydroxyureaontheincorporationof5iodo2deoxyuridineiudrbyhumanbonemarrowandtumourcellsinvivo
AT carmichaelj theinfluenceofhighdosehydroxyureaontheincorporationof5iodo2deoxyuridineiudrbyhumanbonemarrowandtumourcellsinvivo
AT tonkink theinfluenceofhighdosehydroxyureaontheincorporationof5iodo2deoxyuridineiudrbyhumanbonemarrowandtumourcellsinvivo
AT morrisonh theinfluenceofhighdosehydroxyureaontheincorporationof5iodo2deoxyuridineiudrbyhumanbonemarrowandtumourcellsinvivo
AT gatterk theinfluenceofhighdosehydroxyureaontheincorporationof5iodo2deoxyuridineiudrbyhumanbonemarrowandtumourcellsinvivo
AT harrisal theinfluenceofhighdosehydroxyureaontheincorporationof5iodo2deoxyuridineiudrbyhumanbonemarrowandtumourcellsinvivo
AT philippa influenceofhighdosehydroxyureaontheincorporationof5iodo2deoxyuridineiudrbyhumanbonemarrowandtumourcellsinvivo
AT kaklamanisl influenceofhighdosehydroxyureaontheincorporationof5iodo2deoxyuridineiudrbyhumanbonemarrowandtumourcellsinvivo
AT carmichaelj influenceofhighdosehydroxyureaontheincorporationof5iodo2deoxyuridineiudrbyhumanbonemarrowandtumourcellsinvivo
AT tonkink influenceofhighdosehydroxyureaontheincorporationof5iodo2deoxyuridineiudrbyhumanbonemarrowandtumourcellsinvivo
AT morrisonh influenceofhighdosehydroxyureaontheincorporationof5iodo2deoxyuridineiudrbyhumanbonemarrowandtumourcellsinvivo
AT gatterk influenceofhighdosehydroxyureaontheincorporationof5iodo2deoxyuridineiudrbyhumanbonemarrowandtumourcellsinvivo
AT harrisal influenceofhighdosehydroxyureaontheincorporationof5iodo2deoxyuridineiudrbyhumanbonemarrowandtumourcellsinvivo