Cargando…
An assessment of the reliability and reproducibility of measurement of potential doubling times (Tpot) in human colorectal cancers.
An assessment has been made of the reproducibility of measuring tumour proliferation using in vivo iododeoxyuridine (IUdR) labelling and flow cytometry. The variation that occurs between different institutions (Paterson Institute for Cancer Research, Manchester and the Gray Laboratory, Northwood), d...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
1993
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1968360/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8471432 |
_version_ | 1782134723627188224 |
---|---|
author | Wilson, M. S. West, C. M. Wilson, G. D. Roberts, S. A. James, R. D. Schofield, P. F. |
author_facet | Wilson, M. S. West, C. M. Wilson, G. D. Roberts, S. A. James, R. D. Schofield, P. F. |
author_sort | Wilson, M. S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | An assessment has been made of the reproducibility of measuring tumour proliferation using in vivo iododeoxyuridine (IUdR) labelling and flow cytometry. The variation that occurs between different institutions (Paterson Institute for Cancer Research, Manchester and the Gray Laboratory, Northwood), different observers and different runs on the same flow cytometer have been measured on 139 samples from 53 patients with colorectal cancer. The results demonstrate that the IUdR technique for measuring tumour proliferation is reproducible. Correlations were seen between measurements of Tpot obtained by different individuals and on separate machines. However, direct comparisons of the measured parameters showed that there were highly significant differences in the values obtained between institutes and observers (P < 0.001). Despite these variations, there were still significant detectable differences in Tpot measurements between individual tumours (P < 0.001). Analysis of the results obtained by running the same samples on two separate occasions on the same machine showed that the technique was highly reproducible and that the staining procedure was stable. Eighty per cent of the samples were similarly assigned to either above or below the median Tpot value, regardless which observer/laboratory combination was utilised. These data suggest that large clinical trials using Tpot should employ a single centre and a single individual to prepare, run and analyse samples. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1968360 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1993 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-19683602009-09-10 An assessment of the reliability and reproducibility of measurement of potential doubling times (Tpot) in human colorectal cancers. Wilson, M. S. West, C. M. Wilson, G. D. Roberts, S. A. James, R. D. Schofield, P. F. Br J Cancer Research Article An assessment has been made of the reproducibility of measuring tumour proliferation using in vivo iododeoxyuridine (IUdR) labelling and flow cytometry. The variation that occurs between different institutions (Paterson Institute for Cancer Research, Manchester and the Gray Laboratory, Northwood), different observers and different runs on the same flow cytometer have been measured on 139 samples from 53 patients with colorectal cancer. The results demonstrate that the IUdR technique for measuring tumour proliferation is reproducible. Correlations were seen between measurements of Tpot obtained by different individuals and on separate machines. However, direct comparisons of the measured parameters showed that there were highly significant differences in the values obtained between institutes and observers (P < 0.001). Despite these variations, there were still significant detectable differences in Tpot measurements between individual tumours (P < 0.001). Analysis of the results obtained by running the same samples on two separate occasions on the same machine showed that the technique was highly reproducible and that the staining procedure was stable. Eighty per cent of the samples were similarly assigned to either above or below the median Tpot value, regardless which observer/laboratory combination was utilised. These data suggest that large clinical trials using Tpot should employ a single centre and a single individual to prepare, run and analyse samples. Nature Publishing Group 1993-04 /pmc/articles/PMC1968360/ /pubmed/8471432 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wilson, M. S. West, C. M. Wilson, G. D. Roberts, S. A. James, R. D. Schofield, P. F. An assessment of the reliability and reproducibility of measurement of potential doubling times (Tpot) in human colorectal cancers. |
title | An assessment of the reliability and reproducibility of measurement of potential doubling times (Tpot) in human colorectal cancers. |
title_full | An assessment of the reliability and reproducibility of measurement of potential doubling times (Tpot) in human colorectal cancers. |
title_fullStr | An assessment of the reliability and reproducibility of measurement of potential doubling times (Tpot) in human colorectal cancers. |
title_full_unstemmed | An assessment of the reliability and reproducibility of measurement of potential doubling times (Tpot) in human colorectal cancers. |
title_short | An assessment of the reliability and reproducibility of measurement of potential doubling times (Tpot) in human colorectal cancers. |
title_sort | assessment of the reliability and reproducibility of measurement of potential doubling times (tpot) in human colorectal cancers. |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1968360/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8471432 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wilsonms anassessmentofthereliabilityandreproducibilityofmeasurementofpotentialdoublingtimestpotinhumancolorectalcancers AT westcm anassessmentofthereliabilityandreproducibilityofmeasurementofpotentialdoublingtimestpotinhumancolorectalcancers AT wilsongd anassessmentofthereliabilityandreproducibilityofmeasurementofpotentialdoublingtimestpotinhumancolorectalcancers AT robertssa anassessmentofthereliabilityandreproducibilityofmeasurementofpotentialdoublingtimestpotinhumancolorectalcancers AT jamesrd anassessmentofthereliabilityandreproducibilityofmeasurementofpotentialdoublingtimestpotinhumancolorectalcancers AT schofieldpf anassessmentofthereliabilityandreproducibilityofmeasurementofpotentialdoublingtimestpotinhumancolorectalcancers AT wilsonms assessmentofthereliabilityandreproducibilityofmeasurementofpotentialdoublingtimestpotinhumancolorectalcancers AT westcm assessmentofthereliabilityandreproducibilityofmeasurementofpotentialdoublingtimestpotinhumancolorectalcancers AT wilsongd assessmentofthereliabilityandreproducibilityofmeasurementofpotentialdoublingtimestpotinhumancolorectalcancers AT robertssa assessmentofthereliabilityandreproducibilityofmeasurementofpotentialdoublingtimestpotinhumancolorectalcancers AT jamesrd assessmentofthereliabilityandreproducibilityofmeasurementofpotentialdoublingtimestpotinhumancolorectalcancers AT schofieldpf assessmentofthereliabilityandreproducibilityofmeasurementofpotentialdoublingtimestpotinhumancolorectalcancers |