Cargando…

An assessment of the reliability and reproducibility of measurement of potential doubling times (Tpot) in human colorectal cancers.

An assessment has been made of the reproducibility of measuring tumour proliferation using in vivo iododeoxyuridine (IUdR) labelling and flow cytometry. The variation that occurs between different institutions (Paterson Institute for Cancer Research, Manchester and the Gray Laboratory, Northwood), d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilson, M. S., West, C. M., Wilson, G. D., Roberts, S. A., James, R. D., Schofield, P. F.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 1993
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1968360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8471432
_version_ 1782134723627188224
author Wilson, M. S.
West, C. M.
Wilson, G. D.
Roberts, S. A.
James, R. D.
Schofield, P. F.
author_facet Wilson, M. S.
West, C. M.
Wilson, G. D.
Roberts, S. A.
James, R. D.
Schofield, P. F.
author_sort Wilson, M. S.
collection PubMed
description An assessment has been made of the reproducibility of measuring tumour proliferation using in vivo iododeoxyuridine (IUdR) labelling and flow cytometry. The variation that occurs between different institutions (Paterson Institute for Cancer Research, Manchester and the Gray Laboratory, Northwood), different observers and different runs on the same flow cytometer have been measured on 139 samples from 53 patients with colorectal cancer. The results demonstrate that the IUdR technique for measuring tumour proliferation is reproducible. Correlations were seen between measurements of Tpot obtained by different individuals and on separate machines. However, direct comparisons of the measured parameters showed that there were highly significant differences in the values obtained between institutes and observers (P < 0.001). Despite these variations, there were still significant detectable differences in Tpot measurements between individual tumours (P < 0.001). Analysis of the results obtained by running the same samples on two separate occasions on the same machine showed that the technique was highly reproducible and that the staining procedure was stable. Eighty per cent of the samples were similarly assigned to either above or below the median Tpot value, regardless which observer/laboratory combination was utilised. These data suggest that large clinical trials using Tpot should employ a single centre and a single individual to prepare, run and analyse samples.
format Text
id pubmed-1968360
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1993
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-19683602009-09-10 An assessment of the reliability and reproducibility of measurement of potential doubling times (Tpot) in human colorectal cancers. Wilson, M. S. West, C. M. Wilson, G. D. Roberts, S. A. James, R. D. Schofield, P. F. Br J Cancer Research Article An assessment has been made of the reproducibility of measuring tumour proliferation using in vivo iododeoxyuridine (IUdR) labelling and flow cytometry. The variation that occurs between different institutions (Paterson Institute for Cancer Research, Manchester and the Gray Laboratory, Northwood), different observers and different runs on the same flow cytometer have been measured on 139 samples from 53 patients with colorectal cancer. The results demonstrate that the IUdR technique for measuring tumour proliferation is reproducible. Correlations were seen between measurements of Tpot obtained by different individuals and on separate machines. However, direct comparisons of the measured parameters showed that there were highly significant differences in the values obtained between institutes and observers (P < 0.001). Despite these variations, there were still significant detectable differences in Tpot measurements between individual tumours (P < 0.001). Analysis of the results obtained by running the same samples on two separate occasions on the same machine showed that the technique was highly reproducible and that the staining procedure was stable. Eighty per cent of the samples were similarly assigned to either above or below the median Tpot value, regardless which observer/laboratory combination was utilised. These data suggest that large clinical trials using Tpot should employ a single centre and a single individual to prepare, run and analyse samples. Nature Publishing Group 1993-04 /pmc/articles/PMC1968360/ /pubmed/8471432 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wilson, M. S.
West, C. M.
Wilson, G. D.
Roberts, S. A.
James, R. D.
Schofield, P. F.
An assessment of the reliability and reproducibility of measurement of potential doubling times (Tpot) in human colorectal cancers.
title An assessment of the reliability and reproducibility of measurement of potential doubling times (Tpot) in human colorectal cancers.
title_full An assessment of the reliability and reproducibility of measurement of potential doubling times (Tpot) in human colorectal cancers.
title_fullStr An assessment of the reliability and reproducibility of measurement of potential doubling times (Tpot) in human colorectal cancers.
title_full_unstemmed An assessment of the reliability and reproducibility of measurement of potential doubling times (Tpot) in human colorectal cancers.
title_short An assessment of the reliability and reproducibility of measurement of potential doubling times (Tpot) in human colorectal cancers.
title_sort assessment of the reliability and reproducibility of measurement of potential doubling times (tpot) in human colorectal cancers.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1968360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8471432
work_keys_str_mv AT wilsonms anassessmentofthereliabilityandreproducibilityofmeasurementofpotentialdoublingtimestpotinhumancolorectalcancers
AT westcm anassessmentofthereliabilityandreproducibilityofmeasurementofpotentialdoublingtimestpotinhumancolorectalcancers
AT wilsongd anassessmentofthereliabilityandreproducibilityofmeasurementofpotentialdoublingtimestpotinhumancolorectalcancers
AT robertssa anassessmentofthereliabilityandreproducibilityofmeasurementofpotentialdoublingtimestpotinhumancolorectalcancers
AT jamesrd anassessmentofthereliabilityandreproducibilityofmeasurementofpotentialdoublingtimestpotinhumancolorectalcancers
AT schofieldpf anassessmentofthereliabilityandreproducibilityofmeasurementofpotentialdoublingtimestpotinhumancolorectalcancers
AT wilsonms assessmentofthereliabilityandreproducibilityofmeasurementofpotentialdoublingtimestpotinhumancolorectalcancers
AT westcm assessmentofthereliabilityandreproducibilityofmeasurementofpotentialdoublingtimestpotinhumancolorectalcancers
AT wilsongd assessmentofthereliabilityandreproducibilityofmeasurementofpotentialdoublingtimestpotinhumancolorectalcancers
AT robertssa assessmentofthereliabilityandreproducibilityofmeasurementofpotentialdoublingtimestpotinhumancolorectalcancers
AT jamesrd assessmentofthereliabilityandreproducibilityofmeasurementofpotentialdoublingtimestpotinhumancolorectalcancers
AT schofieldpf assessmentofthereliabilityandreproducibilityofmeasurementofpotentialdoublingtimestpotinhumancolorectalcancers